Advertisement

Meeting the Challenges of Hierarchy Through District Leadership

  • Bruce Sheppard
  • Jean Brown
  • David Dibbon
Part of the Studies In Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 8)

Abstract

School districts tend to operate as traditional hierarchical bureaucracies that are highly resistant to collaborative leadership and processes necessary for organizational learning. The literature review and this district case study reveal that, paradoxically, it is only by accepting this reality that school districts can move toward more collaborative leadership. It is this inherent paradox of working within the norms of hierarchy while altering the organizational structures to support collaborative leadership and organizational learning that poses great difficulty for formal leaders. It is risky, complex work. This case study also reveals the risk in doing collaborative research as a critical friend and the effects in a school district when an academic researcher returns to practice.

Keywords

School District Organizational Learning Labor Relation School Board School Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S. (2003). The school district role in educational change: A review of the literature. ICEC working paper #2. Retrieved February 15, 2008 from http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/∼icec/Google Scholar
  2. Baker v. Burin School District #7 (1999). Education Law Reporter, 11(3), 23.Google Scholar
  3. Berends, M., Bodilly, S., & Kirby, S. (2002). Looking back over a decade of whole school reform: The experience of New American Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 168–175.Google Scholar
  4. Bogatch, I., & Brooks, C. (1994). Linking school level innovations with an urban school district’s central office. Journal of School Leadership, 4, 12–27.Google Scholar
  5. Clem, J., & Battino, W. (2006). A systemic change experience in the Chugach School District. TechTrends, 50(2), 35.Google Scholar
  6. Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  7. Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 121–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle, D., & Finn, C. (1984). American schools and the future of local control. Public Interest, 77, 77–95.Google Scholar
  9. Doyle, M., & Straus, M. (1982). How to make meetings work. New York: Berkley.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, R. (2001). The interaction of district interventions with organizational learning processes in schools and school districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Elliott et al. v. Board Of Education of Burin Peninsula (1998a). Education Law Reporter, 9(10), 79.Google Scholar
  12. Elliott et al. v. Board Of Education of Burin Peninsula (1998b). Education Law Reporter, 10(3), 25.Google Scholar
  13. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Elmore, R. (2002) Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Firestone, W., Mangin, M, Martinez, C., & Polovsky, T. (2005). Leading coherent professional development: A comparison of three school districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 413–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Toronto: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Fullan, M. (2005a). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  18. Fullan, M. (2005b). Turnaround leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillingham et al. v. Board of Education of District #3 (1998). Education Law Reporter, 10(3), 27.Google Scholar
  21. Green, R. (2001). New paradigms in school relationships: Collaborating to enhance student achievement. Education, 121(4), 737.Google Scholar
  22. Hightower, A., Knapp, M., Marsh, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2002). The district role in instructional renewal: Setting the stage for dialogue. In A. Hightower, M. Knapp, J. Marsh, & M. McLaughlin (Eds). School districts and instructional renewal. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  23. Honig, M. (2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators’ roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly. 39(3), 292–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Honig, M. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 28(4), 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huberman, M., & Miles, M. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Klingner, J. K., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Vaughn, S. (2001). Examining the school wide “spread” of research-based practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2003). Credibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Leavitt, H. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, March, 96–102.Google Scholar
  29. Leithwood, K. (1995). Toward a more comprehensive appreciation of effective school district leadership. In K. Leithwood (Ed). Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education (pp. 315–340). Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  30. Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., Sharratt, L. (2000). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. In K. Leithwood (Ed.). Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 99–124). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  31. Leithwood, K., Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved November 28, 2005 from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/WF/KnowledgeCenter/KnowledgeTopics/EducationLeader-ship/HowLeadershipInfluencesStudentLearning.htmGoogle Scholar
  32. Little, P., & Miller, S. (2007). Hiring the best teachers? Rural values and person-organizational fit theory. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 118–158.Google Scholar
  33. Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1990). Perceptions of leadership and their implications in organizations. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 129–154). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. MacGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J., & Beresford, C. (1995). Planning matters: The impact of development planning in primary schools. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  35. Maguire, P. (2003). District practices and student achievement. Kelowna, BC: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
  36. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2003). Reforming districts: How districts support school reform. University of Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, L. (1984). American spirit—Visions of a new corporate culture. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  38. Murphy, J. (2007. June). Teacher leadership: Barriers and supports. Paper presented at Teacher Working Conditions that Matter: The Symposium. Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  39. Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (2001). Characteristics of instructionally effective school districts. Journal of Educational Research, 81(3), 175–181.Google Scholar
  40. Newton, P., & Tunison, S. (2003). Developing policy for learning communities. Paper presented at the Eighth National Congress on Rural Education, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.Google Scholar
  41. O’Toole, J. (1996). Leading change. Toronto: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Peterson, K., & Cosner, S. (2005). Teaching your principal. Journal of Staff Development, 26(2), 28–32.Google Scholar
  43. Phelps, J., & Addonizio, M. (2006). How much do schools and districts matter? A production function approach. Educational Considerations, 33(2), 51–62.Google Scholar
  44. Potter v. Halifax Regional School Board (2001). Education Law Reporter, 13(1), 7.Google Scholar
  45. Rusch, E. (2005). Institutional barriers to organizational learning in school systems: The power of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 83–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schools Act 1997, SNL1997 Chapters-12.2 (2005).Google Scholar
  47. Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325–344.Google Scholar
  48. Smylie, M., Conley, S., & Marks, H. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. (101st yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part L) (pp. 162–188). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  49. Spillane, J. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teitel, L. (2006). Supporting school system leaders: The state of effective training programs for school superintendents. The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved March 20, 2006. http:// www.wallacefoundation.org/WF/KnowledgeCenter/KnowledgeTopics/EducationLeadership/ SupportingSchoolSystemLeaders.htmGoogle Scholar
  51. Tewel, K. J. (1995). New schools for a new century. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tracey v. Avalon East School Board (1998). 164 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181.Google Scholar
  53. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163–171.Google Scholar
  54. Walker, E. M. (2002). The politics of school-based management: Understanding the process of devolving authority in urban school districts. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(33). Retrieved February15, 2008 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/Google Scholar
  55. Wall v. Corner Brook/Deer Lake/St Barbe District #3 (1998). Education Law Reporter, 10(3), 28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Sheppard
    • 1
  • Jean Brown
    • 1
  • David Dibbon
    • 1
  1. 1.Fac. Education Prince Philip DriveMemorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations