Advertisement

The Relationship Between Distributed Leadership and Action Learning in Schools: A Case Study

  • Stephen Dinham
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 7)

Teachers’ professional learning has been shown to be fundamental to successful teaching, student achievement and successful schools (Hattie, 2003, 2007; Dinham, 2007a, 2008b). In recent times there has been a movement away from traditional approaches to teachers’ professional learning towards more decentralised, contextualised forms of learning. (Dinham, 2007a).

Keywords

Team Member Action Learning Project Team Quality Teaching Professional Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubusson, P., Brady L., and Dinham S. (2005). Action Learning: What Works? A research report prepared for the New South Wales Department of Education and Training. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
  2. Aubusson, P., Steele F., Dinham S.,8Brady L. (2007). ‘Action learning in teacher learning community formation: informative or transformative?’, Teacher Development, 11(2), pp. 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, N., Wise C., Woods P.,8Harvey J.A. (2003). Distributed Leadership. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.Google Scholar
  4. Brady, L., Aubusson P.,8Dinham S. (2006). ‘Action Learning For School Improvement’, Educational Practice and Theory, 28(2), pp. 27–39.Google Scholar
  5. Crowther, F., Kaagan S., Ferguson M.,8Hann L. (2002). Developing Teacher Leaders. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.Google Scholar
  6. Dick, B. (1997). Action Learning and Action Research, available at:www.scu.edu.au/schools/%gcm/ar/arp/actlearn.html.
  7. Dinham, S. (2005). ‘Principal Leadership for Outstanding Educational Outcomes’, Journal of Educational Administration. 43(4), pp. 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dinham, S. (2007a). ‘The dynamics of creating and sustaining learning communities’, Unicorn Online Refereed Article No. 43, Australian College of Educators.Google Scholar
  9. Dinham, S. (2007b). ‘The Waves of Leadership’, The Australian Educational Leader, 29(3), pp. 20–21, 27.Google Scholar
  10. Dinham, S. (2007c). ‘Authoritative Leadership, Action Learning and Student Accomplishment’, Conference Proceedings, Australian Council for Educational Research, 2007 Research Conference, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar
  11. Dinham, S. (2007d). ‘How Schools Get Moving and Keep Improving: Leadership for Teacher Learning, Student Success and School Renewal’, Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), pp. 263–275.Google Scholar
  12. Dinham, S. (2008a). ‘Counting the Numbers in Educational Change’, The Australian Educational Leader, 30(1), pp. 56–57.Google Scholar
  13. Dinham, S. (2008b). How to Get Your School Moving and Improving: An evidence-based approach. Melbourne: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dinham, S., Brennan K., Collier J., Deece A.,8Mulford D. (2000). ‘The Secondary Head of Department: Key Link in the Quality Teaching and Learning Chain’, Quality Teaching Series, No 2, Australian College of Education, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  15. Dinham, S.8Rowe K. (2007). Teaching and Learning in Middle Schooling A review of the literature – A Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  16. Dinham, S.8Scott C. (2002). ‘Pressure points: School executive and educational change’, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(2), pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
  17. Duignan, P.8Bezzina P. (2006, February). ‘Building Leadership Capacity for Shared Leadership in Schools – Teachers as Leaders of Educational Change’, Australian Centre for Educational Leadership International Conference, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, R. (1996). The Human Side of School Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and Sustainability. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.Google Scholar
  20. Gronn, P. (2002). ‘Distributed Leadership’, in K. Leithwood8P. Hallinger, (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A.8Fink D. (2004). ‘The Seven Principles of Sustainable Leadership’, Educational Leadership, 61(7), pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, A. (2004). ‘Teacher Leadership and Distributed Leadership: An Exploration of the Literature’, Leading and Managing, 10(2), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, A. (2005). ‘Distributed Leadership’, in B. Davies (Ed.), The Essentials of School Leadership. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, A. (2008). ‘Distributed Leadership: According to the evidence’, Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), pp. 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research difference?, available at: http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/documents/Teachers_Make_a_Difference_Hattie.pdf.
  26. Hattie, J. (2007). ‘Developing Potentials for Learning: Evidence, assessment, and progress’, EARLI Biennial Conference, Budapest, Hungary, available at: http://www.education.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/education/staff/j.hattie/presentations.cfm
  27. LaBoskey V. K. (2004). ‘The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings’, in J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey,8T. Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  28. Lambert, L. (1998). Building Leadership Capacity in Schools. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  29. Mulford, B. (2008). The Leadership Challenge Improving Learning in Schools. Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  30. Mumford, A. (1995). ‘Learning in Action’, Industrial and Commercial Training, 27(8), pp. 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: Discussion paper. Sydney: Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate, NSW DET.Google Scholar
  32. Rowe, K.J. (2003). The importance of teacher quality as a key determinant of students’ experiences and outcomes of schooling, discussion paper prepared for the Interim Committee of the NSW Institute of Teachers, available at:http://www.nswteachers.nsw.edu.au/library/Rowe.html.
  33. Spillane, J., Halverson R.,8Diamond J. (2001). ‘Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective’, Educational Researcher, 30(3), pp. 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. York-Barr, J.8Duke K. (2004). ‘What do we Know about Teacher Leadership? Findings from two Decades of Scholarship’, Review of Educational Research, 74(3), pp. 255–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Dinham
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Council for Educational ResearchAustralia

Personalised recommendations