Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Distributed Leadership and Teachers’ Academic Optimism

  • Chapter
Distributed Leadership

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 7))

Current interest in distributed sources of leadership is pervasive among both researchers and practicing leaders (e.g., Harris, 2009; Hammersley-Fletcher and Brundrett, 2005; Storey, 2004). Nevertheless, systematic evidence is modest, at best, about the factors that influence the nature and extent of distributed leadership in schools, as well as the consequences of distributed patterns of leadership for schools and students. The study reported in this paper examined the relationships between four patterns of distributed leadership and a selected set of teacher beliefs likely influence teachers’ leadership distribution preferences. The study also examined the relationship between the four patterns of leadership distribution and teachers’ academic optimism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S., Moore, S., and Sun, J. (2009). Positioning the Principals in Patterns of School Leadership Distribution.. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascall, A., et al. (1976), Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in Los Angeles minority schools. (rep. No. R-2007-LAUSD), Santa Monica, CA: RAND (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 130 243).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993), Perceived self efficacy in cognitive development and functioning, Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. and Organ, D. (1983), “Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship””, Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S. and Schneider, B. (2002), Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., and Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Costa, J. L. and Riordan, G. P. (1996), Teacher efficacy and the capacity to trust, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPaola, M. and Hoy, W. (2005), “Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students”, High School Journal, 88(3), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A. and Martinez, M. C. (2009), “Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., and Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000), “Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure and impact on student achievement”, American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (1998), “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective”. In Dansereau F. and Yammarino, F. (Eds.), Leadership: The Multi-level Approaches (Vol. 24, Part B), Stamford, CT: JAI, pp. 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2000) Distributed Properties: A New Architecture for Leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2003), The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practices in an Era of School Reform. London, UK: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2009). Hybrid Leadership. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. and Heck, R. (1996), “The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995”. In Leithwood K, and Hallinger, P. (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 723–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley-Fletcher, L. and Brundrett, M. (2005), “Leaders on leadership: The impressions of primary school headteachers and subject leaders”, School Leadership and Management, 25(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2009), “Distributed knowledge and knowledge creation”. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H. G. (1998). Assessment of the motivational reactions of teachers to a school-based performance award program. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, K. A. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Influence of principal leadership behaviour, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. and Tarter, J. (1992), “Measuring the health of the school climate: A conceptual framework”, NAASP Bulletin, November, pp. 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J. and Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006), “Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement”, American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W., and Kurz, N. (2007). Teachers’ Academic Optimism: The development and test of a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 821–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1988). Teacher careers and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, C., and Protsik, J. (1997). Risk and reward: Perspectives on the implementation of Kentucky’s school-based performance award program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(4), 474–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2006). Teacher Working Conditions that Matter: Evidence for Change. Toronto, ON: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2000), “The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement”, Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D.,&Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., and Mascall, B. (2002). A Framework for Research on Large-scale Reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., and Wahlstrom, K. (2004), How Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Review of Research for the Learning from Leadership Project. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (2009a). What we have learned and where we go from here. . In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N. and Yashkina, A. (2009b), Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. (2007), “Trust and improvement in schools”, Journal of Educational Change, 8(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (2009). Distributed Leadership: Paradigms, Policy and Paradox.. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., Louis, K. S., and Smylie, M. (2007), Distributed leadership as work redesign: Retrofitting the job characteristics model. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Moorman, R. and Fetter, R. (1990). “Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors.” Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A. (1998), “The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy.” Advances in Research in Teaching, 7, 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., and Gray, P. (2004), “Prior student achievement, collaborative school processes and collective teacher efficacy.” Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H. and Mulford W. (2002), “Leadership and school results”. In Leithwood, K. and Hallinger, P. (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 561–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M. and Stitziel Pareja, A. (2009). School Principals at work: A Distributed Perspective. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., and Strauss, T. (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (2004), “Changing theories of leadership and leadership development”. In Storey, J. (Ed.), Leadership in Organizations: Current Issues and Key Trends. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004), Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A. and Hoy, W. K. (1998), “Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure”, Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L. and LePine, J. A. (1998) “Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity”, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstrom, K. and Louis, K. (2008), “How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy and shared responsibility”. Educational Administration Quarterly, XLIV, 4, 458–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., Sacks, R. (2009). The Relationship Between Distributed Leadership and Teachers’ Academic Optimism. In: Harris, A. (eds) Distributed Leadership. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics