Currently, there is intense interest in the relationship between educational leadership and student outcomes. The interest is evident in the number of recent reviews, syntheses and meta-analyses of the available published evidence (Leithwood et al., 2008; Marzano et al., 2005; Mulford, 2008; Robinson et al., 2008). These publications provide an opportunity for sober reflection on the state of research on educational leadership. Perhaps the most important conclusion to be drawn from them is that there is a radical disconnection between research on educational leadership and the core purpose of schooling – the education of children. The disconnection is most compellingly demonstrated by the miniscule proportion of publications that have empirically tested the relationship between aspects of educational leadership and student achievement and well-being.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press Inc.
Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2000). Advances in research on teaching: Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Vol. 8). Oxford: JAI Press, Elsevier Science.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper8Row.
Camburn, E., Rowan, B.,8Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347–373.
Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D.,8Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 287–301.
Ellett, C. D.,8Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101–128.
Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Press.
Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science: Liberation and its limits. Cambridge: Polity.
French, J. R. P.,8Raven, B. H. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright8A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: research and theory (2nd ed., pp. 607–623). London: Tavistock.
Friedkin, N. E.,8Slater, M. R. (1989). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 139–157.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, Pa.: Falmer Press.
Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 877–917). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gibb, C. A. (1969). Leadership. In G. Lindzey8A. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 205–282). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Goldstein, J. (2004). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation8Policy Analysis, 26(4), 397–421.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.
Gronn, P. (2004). The future of distributed leadership Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141–158.
Harris, A. (2005a). Leading or misleading? Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 255–265.
Harris, A. (2005b). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201–219.
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.
Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253–267.
Heck, R. H. (2000). Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 513–552.
Heck, R. H., Larsen, T. J.,8Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94–125.
Heck, R. H., Marcoulides, G. A.,8Lang, P. (1991). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: The application of discriminant techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 115–135.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Katz, D.,8Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley
Leithwood, K., Harris, A.,8Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership8Management, 28(1), 27–42.
Leithwood, K.,8Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451–479.
Leithwood, K.,8Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership and Management, 20(4), 415–434.
Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N.,8Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67.
Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T.,8McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Auroroa, CO: ASCD and McREL.
Mayer, R.,8Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Mulford, B. (2008). The leadership challenge: Improving learning in schools. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Mulford, W., Silins, H.,8Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Newmann, F. (1994). School-wide professional community: Issues in restructuring schools (Issue Report No. 6). Madison, WI: Center on Organisation and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.
Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E.,8Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.
Reid, I., Brain., K.,8Boyes, L.C. (2004). Teachers or learning leaders?: Where have all the teachers gone? Gone to be leaders, everyone. Educational Studies, 30(3), 251–264.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2001). Embedding leadership in task performance. In K. Wong8C. Evers (Eds.), Leadership for quality schooling: International perspectives (pp. 90–102). London: Falmer Press.
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C.,8Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
Robinson, V. M. J.,8Timperley, H. (2007). The leadership of the improvement of teaching and learning: Lessons from initiatives with positive outcomes for students. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 247–262.
Sinnema, C.,8Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The leadership of teaching and learning: Implications for teacher evaluation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 319–343.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M.,8Pareja, A. S. (2007a). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103–125.
Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., Pustejovsky, J., Pareja, A. S.,8Lewis, G. (2008). Taking a distributed perspective: Epistemological and methodological trade-offs in operationalizing the leader-plus aspect. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 189–213.
Spillane, J. P.,8Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007b). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R.,8Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3–34.
Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395–420.
Timperley, H.,8Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. In G. Kelly, A. Luke8J. Green (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 32). Washington, D.C.: Sage.
Urbanski, A.,8Nickolaou, M. B. (1997). Reflections on teachers as leaders. Educational Policy 11(2), 243–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, V. (2009). Fit for Purpose: An Educationally Relevant Account of Distributed Leadership. In: Harris, A. (eds) Distributed Leadership. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9736-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9737-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)