Skip to main content

Fit for Purpose: An Educationally Relevant Account of Distributed Leadership

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 7))

Currently, there is intense interest in the relationship between educational leadership and student outcomes. The interest is evident in the number of recent reviews, syntheses and meta-analyses of the available published evidence (Leithwood et al., 2008; Marzano et al., 2005; Mulford, 2008; Robinson et al., 2008). These publications provide an opportunity for sober reflection on the state of research on educational leadership. Perhaps the most important conclusion to be drawn from them is that there is a radical disconnection between research on educational leadership and the core purpose of schooling – the education of children. The disconnection is most compellingly demonstrated by the miniscule proportion of publications that have empirically tested the relationship between aspects of educational leadership and student achievement and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2000). Advances in research on teaching: Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Vol. 8). Oxford: JAI Press, Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper8Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camburn, E., Rowan, B.,8Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D.,8Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, C. D.,8Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science: Liberation and its limits. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P.,8Raven, B. H. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright8A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: research and theory (2nd ed., pp. 607–623). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E.,8Slater, M. R. (1989). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, Pa.: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 877–917). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, C. A. (1969). Leadership. In G. Lindzey8A. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 205–282). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (2004). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation8Policy Analysis, 26(4), 397–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2004). The future of distributed leadership Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2005a). Leading or misleading? Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2005b). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H. (2000). Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 513–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., Larsen, T. J.,8Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., Marcoulides, G. A.,8Lang, P. (1991). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: The application of discriminant techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D.,8Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A.,8Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership8Management, 28(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K.,8Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K.,8Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership and Management, 20(4), 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N.,8Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Waters, T.,8McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Auroroa, CO: ASCD and McREL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.,8Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2008). The leadership challenge: Improving learning in schools. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, W., Silins, H.,8Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. (1994). School-wide professional community: Issues in restructuring schools (Issue Report No. 6). Madison, WI: Center on Organisation and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E.,8Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, I., Brain., K.,8Boyes, L.C. (2004). Teachers or learning leaders?: Where have all the teachers gone? Gone to be leaders, everyone. Educational Studies, 30(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. M. J. (2001). Embedding leadership in task performance. In K. Wong8C. Evers (Eds.), Leadership for quality schooling: International perspectives (pp. 90–102). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C.,8Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. M. J.,8Timperley, H. (2007). The leadership of the improvement of teaching and learning: Lessons from initiatives with positive outcomes for students. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnema, C.,8Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The leadership of teaching and learning: Implications for teacher evaluation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M.,8Pareja, A. S. (2007a). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., Pustejovsky, J., Pareja, A. S.,8Lewis, G. (2008). Taking a distributed perspective: Epistemological and methodological trade-offs in operationalizing the leader-plus aspect. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P.,8Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007b). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R.,8Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H.,8Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. In G. Kelly, A. Luke8J. Green (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 32). Washington, D.C.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanski, A.,8Nickolaou, M. B. (1997). Reflections on teachers as leaders. Educational Policy 11(2), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, V. (2009). Fit for Purpose: An Educationally Relevant Account of Distributed Leadership. In: Harris, A. (eds) Distributed Leadership. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics