Advertisement

Smog Chamber Measurements

Abstract

Photochemical smog still remains an issue in urban areas. Various smog chambers have been used to examine atmospheric processes of the formation of ozone and secondary organic aerosols. Prior to conduct smog chamber experiments, spectrum and intensity of light sources and chamber wall effects need to be characterized. Experimental techniques such as light intensity control, temperature control, comparison of twin chambers are also required to obtain more reliable and useful data from smog chamber experiments. Smog chamber experiments can be classified into indoor and outdoor chamber studies or VOCs–NOx–air mixture and ambient air experiments. Some typical and important investigations from previous smog chamber experiments are introduced here. Finally, applications of smog chamber experiments are demonstrated for diesel exhaust and indoor air chemistry.

Keywords

Ozone Photochemical smog Secondary organic aerosol Smog chamber Visibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angove DE, Halliburton BW, Nelson PF (2000) Development of a new indoor environmental chamber at MRL, North Ryde, 15th International Clean Air and Environment Conference, 270–274, Reproduced with the permission of the CSIROGoogle Scholar
  2. Bae GN, Kim MC, Lee SB, Song KB, Jin HC, Moon KC (2003) Design and performance evaluation of the KIST indoor smog chamber (in Korean), J Korean Soc Atmos Environ, 19(4), 437–449Google Scholar
  3. Bae GN, Park JY, Kim MC, Lee SB, Moon KC, Kim YP (2008) Effect of light intensity on the ozone formation and the aerosol number concentration of ambient air in Seoul (in Korean), Part Aerosol Res, 4(1), 9–20, Reprinted with permission of KAPARGoogle Scholar
  4. Behnke W, Holländer W, Koch W, Nolting F, Zetzsch C (1988) A smog chamber for studies of the photochemical degradation of chemicals in the presence of aerosols, Atmos Environ, 22(6), 1113–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman FM, Odum JR, Seinfeld JH (1997) Mathematical model for gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosols, Atmos Environ, 31(23), 3921–3931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bufalini JJ, Theodore AW, Marijon MB (1977) Contamination effects on ozone formation in smog chambers, Environ Sci Technol, 11, 1181–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter WPL, Luo D, Malkina IL, Pierce JA (1995) Environmental chamber studies of atmospheric reactivities of volatile organic compounds – Effects of varying chamber and light sources, Final report to National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Contract XZ-2-12075, Coordinating Research Council, Inc., Project M-9, California Air Resources Board, Contract A032–0692, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Contract C91323, University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter WP, Fitz DR (2003) A smog simulation chamber for determining atmospheric reactivity and evaluating measurement techniques, Air and Waste Management Association’s 2003 Annual Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, paper #111Google Scholar
  9. Carter WPL, Cocker III DR, Fitz DR, Malkina IL, Bumiller K, Sauer CG, Pisano JT, Bufalino C, Song C (2005) A new environmental chamber for evaluation of gas-phase chemical mechanism and secondary aerosol formation, Atmos Environ, 39, 7768–7788, Copyright 2005, Reprinted with permission from ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cocker D, Whitlock N, Collins D, Wang J, Flagan R, Seinfeld J (1999) Instrumentation for state-of-art aerosol measurements in smog chambers, Combined U.S./German Ozone/Fine Particle Science and Environmental Chamber Workshop, Riverside, CA, October 4–6Google Scholar
  11. Cocker III DR, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (2001) State-of-art chamber facility for studying atmospheric aerosol chemistry, Environ Sci Technol, 35(12), 2594–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crump JG, Seinfeld JH (1981) Turbulent deposition and gravitational sedimentation of an aerosol in a vessel of arbitrary shape, J Aerosol Sci, 12, 405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodge MC (2000) Chemical oxidant mechanisms for air quality modeling: Critical review, Atmos Environ, 34, 2103–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edney EO, Kleindienst TE, Jaoui M, Lewandowski M, Offenberg JH, Wang W, Claeys M (2005) Formation of 2-methyl tetrols and 2-methylglyceric acid in secondary organic aerosol from laboratory irradiated isoprene/NOx/SO2 mixtures and their detection in ambient PM2.5 samples collected in the eastern United States, Atmos Environ, 39, 5281–5289Google Scholar
  15. Finlayson B, Pitts Jr JN (1976) Photochemistry of the polluted troposphere, Science, 192, 111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forstner HJL, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (1997) Secondary organic aerosol from the photooxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons: Molecular composition, Environ Sci Technol, 31, 1345–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geiger H, Kleffmann J, Wiesen P (2002) Smog chamber studies on the influence of diesel exhaust on photosmog formation, Atmos Environ, 36, 1737–1747, Copyright 2002, Reprinted with permission from ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gery MW, Fox DL, Jeffries HE, Stockburger L, Weathers WS (1985) A continuous stirred tank reactor investigation of the gas-phase reaction of hydroxyl radicals and toluene, Int J Chem Kinet, 17(9), 931–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gery MW, Corouse RR (2002) User’s Guide for Executing OZIPR, US EPA home page http://www.epa.gov/scram001/models/other/oziprdme.txt, Accessed in December 2002
  20. Ghim YS, Moon KC, Lee SH, Kim YP (2005) Visibility trends in Korea during the past two decades, J Air Waste Manage Assoc, 55, 73–82, Reprinted with permission of JOURNAL of A&WMAGoogle Scholar
  21. Grosjean D (1985) Wall loss of gaseous pollutants in outdoor Teflon chambers, Environ Sci Technol, 19, 1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosjean D, Seinfeld JH (1989) Parameterization of the formation potential of secondary organic aerosols, Atmos Environ, 23(8), 1723–1747Google Scholar
  23. Heisler SL, Friedlander SK (1977) Gas-to-particle conversion in photochemical smog: Aerosol growth laws and mechanisms for organics, Atmos Environ, 11, 157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu D, Kamens RM (2007) Evaluation of the UNC toluene-SOA mechanism with respect to other chamber studies and key model parameters, Atmos Environ, 41, 6465–6477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu D, Tolocka M, Li Q, Kamens RM (2007) A kinetic mechanism for predicting secondary organic aerosol formation from toluene oxidation in the presence of NOx and natural sunlight, Atmos Environ, 41, 6478–6496, Copyright 2007, Reprinted with permission from ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurley MD, Sokolov O, Wallington TJ, Takekawa H, Karasawa M, Klotz B, Barnes I, Becker KH (2001) Organic aerosol formation during the atmospheric degradation of toluene, Environ Sci Technol, 35(7), 1358–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hynes RG, Angove DE, Saunders SM, Haverd V, Azzi M (2005) Evaluation of two MCM v3.1 alkene mechanisms using indoor environmental chamber data, Atmos Environ, 39, 7251–7262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Izumi K, Fukuyama T (1990) Photochemical aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of NOx, Atmos Environ, 24A(6), 1433–1441Google Scholar
  29. Jaimes JLL, Sandoval JF, Gonzáalez UM, Gonzáalez EO (2003) Liquefied petroleum gas effect on ozone formation in Mexico City, Atmos Environ, 37, 2327–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaimes JLL, Sandoval JF, González EO, Vázquez MG, González UM, Zambrano AG (2005) Effect of liquefied petroleum gas on ozone formation in Guadalajara and Mexico City, J Air Waste Manage Assoc, 55 (6), 841–846Google Scholar
  31. Jang M, Kamens RM (2001) Atmospheric secondary aerosol formation by heterogeneous reactions of aldehydes in the presence of a sulfuric acid aerosol catalyst, Environ Sci Technol, 35, 4758–4766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jang M, Carroll B, Chandramouli B, Kamens, RM (2003) Particle growth by acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions of organic carbonyls on preexisting aerosols, Environ Sci Technol, 37, 3828–3837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeffries H, Sexton K, Yu J (1998) Atmospheric photochemistry studies of pollutant emissions from transportation vehicles operating on alternative fuels, Report to National Renewable Energy Laboratory Under Contract No DE-AC36-83CH10093, NREL/TP-452-21426, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
  34. Ju OJ (2006) Effect of temperature on the photochemical reaction of toluene–NOx–air mixture (in Korean), Master dissertation thesis, Seoul National University, Reprinted with permission from Ok Jung JuGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalberer M, Paulsen D, Sax M, Steinbacher M, Dommen J, Prevot ASH, Fisseha R, Weingartner E, Frankevich V, Zenobi R, Baltensperger U (2004) Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kanakidou M, Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN, Barnes I, Dentener FJ, Facchini MC, Van Dingenen R, Ervens B, Nenes A, Nielsen CJ, Swietlicki E, Putaud JP, Balkanski Y, Fuzzi S, Horth J, Moortgat GK, Winterhalter R, Myhre CEL, Tsigaridis K, Vignati E, Stephanou EG, Wilson J (2005) Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: A review, Atmos Chem Phys, 5, 1053–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly NA (1982) Characterization of fluorocarbon-film bags as smog chambers, Environ Sci Technol, 16(11), 763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly NA, Olson KL, Wong CA (1985) Tests for fluorocarbon and other organic vapor release by fluorocarbon film bags, Environ Sci Technol, 19(4), 361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kelly NA (1987) The photochemical formation and fate of nitric acid in the metropolitan Detroit area: Ambient, captive-air irradiation and modeling results, Atmos Environ, 21(10), 2163–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelly NA, Gunst RF (1990) Response of ozone to changes in hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxide concentrations in outdoor smog chambers filled with Los Angeles air, Atmos Environ, 24A(12), 2991–3005Google Scholar
  41. Kleindienst TE, Smith DF, Hudgens EE, Snow RF, Perry E, Claxton LD, Bufalini JJ, Black FM, Cupitt LT (1992) The photo-oxidation of automobile emissions: Measurements of the transformation products and their mutagenic acitivity, Atmos Environ, 26A(16), 3039–3053Google Scholar
  42. Lamorena RB, Jung SG, Bae GN, Lee W (2007) The formation of ultra-fine particles during ozone-initiated oxidations with terpenes emitted from natural paint, J Hazard Mater, 141, 245–251, Copyright 2007, Reprinted with permission from ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee S-B, Bae G-N, Moon K-C (2004a) Aerosol wall loss in Teflon film chambers filled with ambient air, J Korean Soc Atmos Environ, 20(E1), 35–41Google Scholar
  44. Lee S-B, Bae G-N, Moon K-C, Choi M (2006) Effect of diesel exhaust on the photochemical reactions of ambient air (in Korean), Part Aerosol Res, 2(3–4), 127–140, Reprinted with permission of KAPARGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee SB, Bae GN, Moon KC (2007) Effect of diesel particles on the photooxidation of a diluted diesel exhaust-toluene mixture, SAE Technical 2007-01-0315Google Scholar
  46. Lee S, Jang M, Kamens RM (2004b) SOA formation from the photooxidation of α-pinene in the presence of freshly emitted diesel soot exhaust, Atmos Environ, 38, 2597–2605Google Scholar
  47. Lee Y-M, Bae G-N, Lee S-B, Kim M-C, Moon K-C (2005a) Effect of initial toluene concentration on the photooxidation of toluene–NOx–air mixture – I. Change of gaseous species (in Korean), J Korean Soc Atmos Environ, 21(1), 15–26Google Scholar
  48. Lee Y-M, Bae G-N, Lee S-B, Kim M-C, Moon K-C (2005b) Effect of initial toluene concentration on the photooxidation of toluene–NOx–air mixture – II. Aerosol formation and growth (in Korean), J Korean Soc Atmos Environ, 21(1), 27–38Google Scholar
  49. Lonneman WA, Buflini JJ, Kuntz RL, Meeks SA (1981) Contamination from fluorocarbon films, Environ Sci Technol, 15(1), 99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McDonald JD, Barr EB, White RK (2004) Design, characterization, and evaluation of a small-scale diesel exhaust exposure system, Aerosol Sci Technol, 38, 62–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McMurry PH, Friedlander SK (1978) Aerosol formation in reacting gases: Relation of surface area to rate of gas-to-particle conversion, J Colloid Interface Sci, 64(2), 248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McMurry PH, Grosjean D (1985) Gas and aerosol wall losses in Teflon film smog chambers, Environ Sci Technol, 19(12), 1176–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McMurry PH, Rader DJ (1985) Aerosol wall losses in electrically charged chambers, Aerosol Sci Technol, 4, 249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McMurry P, Shepherd M, Vickery J (2004) Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers – A NARSTO Assessment, Cambridge University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  55. Moon K-C et al. (2004a) A Study on the Smog Mechanism and Control Technology (in Korean), Report of Korea Institute of Science and Technology to Korean Ministry of Science and Technology, M1-0204-00-0049Google Scholar
  56. Moon KC, Bae GN, Lee SB, Lee YM, Choi JE (2004b) Smog study using twin chambers filled with ambient air, 13th World Clean Air and Environmental Protection, IUAPPA, London, UK, August 22–27Google Scholar
  57. Moon K-C, Bae G-N, Lee Y-M, Lee S-B (2006) Effect of the initial concentration ratio of toluene/NOxon the photochemical reactions of ambient air, 15th IUAPPA, Lilli, France, September 5–8Google Scholar
  58. Morrison GC, Nazaroff WW (2002) Ozone interactions with carpet: Secondary emissions of aldehydes, Environ Sci Technol, 36, 2185–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nazaroff WW, Weschler CJ (2004) Cleaning products and air fresheners: Exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants, Atmos Environ, 38, 2841–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Odum JR, Hoffmann T, Bowman F, Collins D, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (1996) Gas/particle partitioning and secondary organic aerosol yields, Environ Sci Technol, 30, 2580–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Odum JR, Jungkamp TPW, Griffin RJ, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (1997) The atmospheric aerosol-forming potential of whole gasoline vapor, Science, 276, 96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oh S, Andino JM (2000) Effects of ammonium sulfate aerosols on the reactions of the hydroxyl radical with organic compounds, Atmos Environ, 34, 2901–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oh S, Andino JM (2001) Kinetics of the gas-phase reactions of hydroxyl radicals with C1–C6 aliphatic alcohols in the presence of ammonium sulfate aerosols, Int J Chem Kinet, 33, 422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oh S, Andino JM (2002) Laboratory studies of the impact of aerosol composition on the heterogeneous oxidation of 1-propanol, Atmos Environ, 36, 149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pandis SN, Paulson SE, Seinfeld JH, Flagan RC (1991) Aerosol formation in the photooxidation of isoprene and β-pinene, Atmos Environ, 25A, 997–1008Google Scholar
  66. Pankow JF (1994a) An absorption model of gas/particle partitioning of organic compounds in the atmosphere, Atmos Environ, 28(2), 185–188Google Scholar
  67. Pankow JF (1994b) An absorption model of gas/aerosol partitioning involved in the formation of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos Environ, 28(2), 189–193Google Scholar
  68. Pitts Jr JN, Smith JP, Fitz DR, Grosjean D (1977) Enhancement of photochemical smog by N,N′ diethylhydroxylamine in polluted ambient air, Science, 197, 255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prager MJ, Stephens ER, Scott WE (1960) Aerosol formation from gaseous air pollutants, Indust Eng Chem, 52(6), 521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roberts PT, Friedlander SK (1976) Photochemical aerosol formation SO2, 1-Heptene, and NOx in ambient air, Environ Sci Technol, 10(6), 573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saathoff H, Naumann K-H, Schnaiter M, Schöck W, Möhler O, Schurath U, Weingartner E, Gysel M, Baltensperger U (2003) Coating of soot and (NH4)2SO4 particles by ozonolysis products of α-pinene, J Aerosol Sci, 34, 1297–1321, Copyright 2003, Reprinted with permission from ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Wiley, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  73. Shibuya K, Nagashima T, Imai S, Akimoto H (1981) Photochemical ozone formation in the irradiation of ambient air samples by using a mobile smog chamber, Environ Sci Technol, 15(6), 661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Song C, Na K, Cocker III DR (2005) Impact of the hydrocarbon to NOx ratio on secondary organic aerosol formation, Environ Sci Technol, 39, 3413–3419Google Scholar
  75. Song C, Na K, Warren B, Malloy Q, Cocker III DR (2007) Impact of propene on secondary organic aerosol formation from m-xylene, Environ Sci Technol, 41, 6990–6995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stephens ER, Hanst PL, Doerr RC, Scott WE (1956) Reactions of nitrogen dioxide and organic compounds in air, Indust Eng Chem, 48(9), 1498–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stephens ER, Schuck EA (1958) Air pollution effects of irradiated auto exhaust as related to fuel consumption, Chem Eng Prog, 54(11), 71–77Google Scholar
  78. Stroud CA, Makar PA, Michelangeli DV, Mozurkewich M, Hastie DR, Barbu A, Humble J (2004) Simulating organic aerosol formation during the photooxidation of toluene/NOx mixtures: Comparing the equilibrium and kinetic assumption, Environ Sci Technol, 38, 1471–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang S-C, Paulson SE, Grosjean D, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (1992) Aerosol formation and growth in atmospheric organic/NOx systems – I. Outdoor smog chamber studies of C7- and C8-hydrocarbons, Atmos Environ, 26A(3), 403–420Google Scholar
  80. Wentzel M, Gorzawski H, Naumann K-H, Saathoff H, Weinbruch S (2003) Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization of soot aerosols, J Aerosol Sci, 34, 1347–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiesen P (1999) Investigation of real car exhaust in the EUPHORE chamber, in Combined US/German Ozone/Fine Particle Science and Environmental Chamber Workshop, Riverside, CA, October 4–6Google Scholar
  82. Wiesen P (2000) Diesel Fuel and Soot: Fuel Formulation and Its Atmospheric Implications, Final report of EU project contract ENV4-CT97-0390Google Scholar
  83. Winer AM, Peters JW, Smith JP, Pitts Jr JN (1974) Response of commercial chemiluminescent NO–NO2 analyzers to other nitrogen-containing compounds, Environ Sci Technol, 8(13), 1118–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zafonte L, Rieger PL, Holmes JR (1977) Nitrogen dioxide photolysis in the Los Angeles atmosphere, Environ Sci Technol, 11(5), 483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zielinska B, Samy S, Seagrave JC, McDonald J, Wirtz K, Vazquez MM (2007) Investigation of atmospheric transformations of diesel emissions in the European Photoreactor (EUPHORE), 5th Asian Aerosol Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, August 26–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Institute of Science and TechnologySeongbuk-guKorea

Personalised recommendations