Skip to main content

Biological Metaphors in Economics: Natural Selection and Competition

  • Chapter
Book cover Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change

Part of the book series: Methodos Series ((METH,volume 7))

In our time, we face stagnating production and employment but also, more \nobreak generally, disappointing results in the provision of services that importantly affect our lives – in education, healthcare and social welfare, in transport and communications. To combat these ills one sole therapy is increasingly invoked: greater competition. Here, I am not referring to the idea that, in well-defined situations from the point of view of structure and of the actors involved, the stimulus from competitors, together with other forces, actions and stimuli, may revive waning energies through a spirit of emulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, R. C. (1979). Social Darwinism. Science and myth in Anglo-American social thought. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckner, M. (1968). The biological way of thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969) Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonifati, G. (2003). Concorrenza come processo di interazione, agenti e sistemi del mercato. A note from the Information Society as a Complex System (ISCOM) discussion group. Department of Social, Cognitive and Quantitative Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. J. (1988). Hayek’s transformation. History of Political Economy, 20(4), 513–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. In The collected works of Charles Darwin (Vol. 16). London, UK: William Pickering, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1887). The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter (Vol. I, F. Darwin, Ed.). London, UK: John Murray Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882 with original omissions restored (N. Barlow, Ed.). London, UK: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, A. (2004). Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire. Journal of Economic Methodology, 3, 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donzelli, F. (1988). Introduction to F.A. von Hayek, Conoscenza, mercato, pianificazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, M. (1988). Hayek’s bizarre liberalism, a critique. Political Studies, 36(2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (1997). The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: From biological analogy to economic self-organization. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(4), 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Essays in positive economics (pp.3–43). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garegnani, P. (1976). On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value: A comment on Samuelson. In M. Brown, K. Sato, & P. Zarembcka (Eds.), Essays in modern capital theory. Amsterdam, New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1980). The Panda’s Thumb: More reflections on natural history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1982). The meaning of punctuated equilibrium and its role in validating a hierarchical approach to macroevolution. In R. Milkman (Ed.), Perspectives on evolution (pp.83–104). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist program. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Science, 205, 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E. & Hitch, C. (1939). Price theory and business behaviour. Oxford Economic Papers, 2(1),12–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, M. (1997). Social Darwinism in European and American thought 1860–1945: Nature as model and nature as threat. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1940). Socialist calculation: The competitive solution. Economica, 7(26), 125–149, reprinted in von Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530, reprinted in von Hayek, F.A. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1948). The meaning of competition. In Individualism and economic order (pp. 92–106). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1952). The sensory order: An inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1978). New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, Vol. I: Rules and order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty, Vol. III: The political order of a free people. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1991). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism (W. W. Bartley III, Ed.). Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2001). The hidden theology of Adam Smith. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, (8)1,1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S., & Kohn, D. (1985). The immediate origins of natural selection. In D. Kohn (Ed.), The Darwinian heritage (pp. 185–206), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993). Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1955). Social Darwinism in American thought, 1860–1915. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao, B., & Israel, G. (1990). The invisible hand. Economic equilibrium in the history of science (I. McGilvray, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1987). Essays, comments and reviews (F. H. Burkhardt, F. Bowers, & I. K. Skrupskelis, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, N. M. (1995). Alchian and the ‘Alchian Thesis.’ Journal of Economic Methodology, 2(2), 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1971). The general theory of employment, interest and money. In The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes (Vol. VII). London, UK: St Martin’s Press [first edition, 1936].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, D. (1989). Darwin’s ambiguity: The secularization of biological meaning. British Journal for the History of Science, 22, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Vergata, A. (1985). Images of Darwin: A historiographic review. In D. Kohn (Ed.), The Darwinian heritage (pp. 901–972). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Vergata A. (1990a). L’equilibrio e la guerra della natura. Dalla Teologia naturale al darwinismo. Naples, Italy: Morano.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Vergata, A. (1990b). Nonostante Malthus. Fecondità, popolazioni e armonia della natura, 1700–1900. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Nuñez, G. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. A. (2002). Complexity and local interaction: Towards a theory of industrial districts, in complexity and industrial clusters (A. Quadrio Curzio & M. Fortis, Eds.). Heidelberg-New York: Phisica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R. A. (1946) Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage-employment problems. American Economic Review, 36,62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1973). Individualism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maione, G. (2003). Le Merci Intelligenti: Miti e Realtà del Capitalismo Contemporaneo. Milan, Italy: Bruno Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society, with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. London, UK: J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T. R. (1979). An essay on the principle of population; and, a summary view of the principle of population (A. Flew, Ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: UK Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manier, E. (1978). The young Darwin and his cultural circle. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1962). Capital: A critique of political economy, vol. III. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1969). Theories of surplus value, vol. 2. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, R., & Lane, D. A. (1997). Foresight, complexity and strategy. In W. F. Arthur, S. Durlauf, & D. A. Lane (Eds.), Economy as a complex, evolving system II. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. diversity, evolution and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1871). Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehere, Vienna, Austria: Wilhelm Braumüller, Authors Translation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften und der politischen Ökonomie insbesondere. Leipzig Drucker & Humblot; L. Schneider (Ed.), Problems of economics and sociology (in English). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardozzi, G. (2004). Miracolo e declino. L’Italia fra concorrenza e protezione. Bari, Italy: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R. (1975). Polythetic classification: convergence and consequences. Man, 10, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). On the geneology of morals: A polemic.New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1988). Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Suppl. Vol., pp. 145–188). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ospovat, D. (1979). Darwin after Malthus. Journal of the History of Biology, 12, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parboni, R. (1984). Moneta e Monetarismo. Bologna, Italy: IlMulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. F. (1988). Liberalism, unintended orders and evolutionism. Political Studies, 36(2), 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1952). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. American Economic Review, 42(5), 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1953). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm: Rejoinder. American Economic Review, 43(4), 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picchio, A. (1992). Social Reproduction. The Political Economy of the Labour Market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1973). Letters 1819 – June 1821. Vol. VIII of P. Sraffa and M. Dobb (Eds.), The works and correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. Economic Journal, 82(327), 883–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1970). Reflections on the recent Federal Reserve policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2(1),33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweber, S.S. (1977). The origin of the Origin revisited.Journal of the History of Biology, 10(2), 229–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1992). Capitalism, socialism and democracy.London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Leipzig, Germany: Dunker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993). Capability and well-being. In A. K. Sen & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2002). On the Darwinian view of progress (1991). In A. K. Sen, Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. A. (1986). Austrian economics and Austrian philosophy. In W. Grassl & B. Smith (Eds.). Austrian economics: historical and philosophical background. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. A. (1990). Aristotle, Menger, Mises: an essay in the metaphysics of economics. In B.J. Caldwell (Ed.), Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Annual Supplement to History of political economy (Vol. 22). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1981). Holism, individualism and the units of selection. In E. Sober (Ed.), Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology: An anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1972). The role of providence in the social order. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Note sul Ramo d’oro di Fraser. Milano: Adelphi. Italian translation of Bemerkungen uber Frazers The Golden Bough, Synthese, XVII, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. M. (1985). Darwinism is social. In D. Kohn (Ed.), The Darwinian heritage (pp. 609–638). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ginzburg, A. (2009). Biological Metaphors in Economics: Natural Selection and Competition. In: Lane, D., Pumain, D., van der Leeuw, S.E., West, G. (eds) Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change. Methodos Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9663-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics