Incorporating a New Technology into Agent-Artifact Space: The Case of Control System Automation in Europe

  • Federica Rossi
  • Paolo Bertossi
  • Paolo Gurisatti
  • Luisa Sovieni
Part of the Methodos Series book series (METH, volume 7)

We contribute to the debate on innovation theory and policy by exploring, through the interpretative framework provided by Lane and Maxfield’s theory of innovation (1996, 2005, this volume), a set of case studies concerning the implementation of a new technology for system automation and its incorporation into agent-artifact space (Lane & Maxfield, 1997). Our purposes are on the one hand, to illustrate to what extent this theoretical approach can help explain innovation processes, and, on the other, to derive some general implications for innovation theory. By focusing on agents involved in different kinds of interactions around the same technology, we introduce and compare different practices according to which a new technology can be incorporated into the existing structure of agent-artifact space, and we discuss some of the complexities involved in processes of technological adoption and diffusion, which are often modelled in excessively simplistic terms.

Keywords

Europe Product Line Defend OECD Refrigeration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bijker, W., Hughes, T., &Pinch, T. (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. CSIA. (2002). The market for control system integrators. White Paper Prepared for The Control System Integrators Association.Google Scholar
  3. David, P. (1991). Computer and dynamo. The modern productivity paradox in a not too distant mirror. In Technology and productivity: The challenge for economic policy (pp. 315–345). Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  4. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Echelon. (1998a). Going open, wide open, White paper. http://www.echelon.com/support/documentation/papers/Going_Open.pdf. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  6. Echelon. (1998b). End to end solutions with LonWorks control technology, White paper. http://www.echelon.com/solutions/opensystems/papers/end2end.pdf. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  7. Echelon. (1999). Introduction to LonWorks systems, White paper. http://www.echelon.com/support/documentation/manuals/general/078-0183-01A.pdf. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  8. Echelon. (2000a). Honeywell enters into international purchase agreement with echelon, press release 07 February 2000. http://www.echelon.com/company/press/2000/honeywellcommit.htm.Accessed 13 November 2007.
  9. Echelon. (2000b). Implementing open, interoperable building control Systems, White paper. http://www.echelon.com/solutions/building/papers/BacNetComp.pdf. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  10. Echelon. (2000c). TAC AB signs international LonWorks® open systems reseller agreement companies to jointly promote LonWorks system to building controls market, Press Release 21 March 2000. http://www.echelon.com/company/press/2000/tacab.htm. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  11. Echelon. (2005). Open systems design guide, White paper. http://www.echelon.com/support/documentation/papers/OpenSysDesignGuide.pdf. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  12. Gowan, J. (2002). Industry focus shifts to web convergence. Automated Buildings, November, http://www.automatedbuildings.com/news/nov02/articles/sin/sin.htm. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  13. Hartman, T. (2003). Convergence: What is it, what will it mean, and when will it happen? Automated Buildings, April. http://www.automatedbuildings.com/news/apr03/articles/thessup/thessup.htm. Accessed 13 November 2007.
  14. Lane, D. A. (2006). Heirarchy, complexity, society. In D. Pumain (Ed.), Hierarchies in natural and social systems (pp. 81–120). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lane, D. A., &Maxfield, R. (1996). Strategy under complexity: Fostering generative relationships. Long Range Planning, 29, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lane, D. A., &Maxfield, R. (1997). Foresight, complexity and strategy. In W.B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, &D. A. Lane (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system II (pp. 169–198), SFI studies in the sciences of complexity (Vol. 27). Boston, MA: Addison-Wessley.Google Scholar
  17. Lane, D.A., &Maxfield, R. (2005). Ontological uncertainty and innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(1), 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mollerman, E., &Broekhuis, M. (2001). Sociotechnical systems: towards an organizational learning approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson, R., &Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ropohl, G. (1999). Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 4(3) 59–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federica Rossi
    • 1
  • Paolo Bertossi
  • Paolo Gurisatti
  • Luisa Sovieni
  1. 1.Dipartimento di EconomiaUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations