Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Essential Readings in Biosemiotics pp 697–729Cite as

The Cybersemiotic Model of Communication: An Evolutionary View on the Threshold between Semiosis and Informational Exchange

  • Chapter

  • 1917 Accesses

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 3))

Abstract

Because the domain of investigation that biosemiotics encompasses – i.e., the investigation of the sign use observable in any living system, at any level of its organization – is so large, the accomplishment of interdisciplinary synthesis and the search for unifying explanatory principles become increasingly pressing tasks. Having devoted over twenty years to a focused attempt at synthesizing insights from first- and second-order cybernetics theory, ethology, sociology, embodied cognitive science and philosophy of mind with Peircean semiotics, Danish biosemiotican Søren Brier has articulated a cybersemiotic framework for the understanding of animal and human evolution, communication, and cognition.

Søren Brier(1951– )

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brier’s editorial and committee work – like his scholarly output – is prodigious, as he also serves on the Editorial Board of the journals System Research and Behavioral Sciences Biosemiotics, The Journal of Trans-person Studies, Triple C: The Journal of Cognition Communication and Cooperation and Signs, and on the Board of the Science of Information Institute, the Foundation of Information Science, and the Sociocybernetic Research Group of the International Sociological Association.

  2. 2.

    Thanks to John Collier for pointing out MacKay to me and for his most valuable critique of an earlier version of the manuscript.

  3. 3.

    The formulation is a result of a discussion with Jesper Hoffmeyer on April 3, 2001, in my office at KVL. As such it is a way to interpret Deely’s physiosemiosis theory.

References

  • Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology. St. Albans: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. (2000). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1983). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1992). Information and consciousness: A critique of the mechanistic concept of information. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 1(2/3), 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1995). Cyber-semiotics: On autopoiesis, code-duality and sign games in bio-semiotics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 3(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1998a). The cybersemiotic explanation of the emergence of cognition: The explanation of cognition signification and communication in a non-cartesian cognitive biology. Evolution and Cognition 4(1), 90–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1998b). Cybersemiotics: A transdisciplinary framework for information studies. BioSystems 46, 185–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1999a). On the conflict between the informational and the semiotic communicational paradigm. In: Proceedings from the 43rd Annual Conference of The International Society for the Systems Sciences, 28 June–2 July, Asilomar, CA, USA. CDROM, Article No. 99169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1999b). Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics. Reconceptualizing the insights of ethology, second order cybernetics and Peirce’s semiotics in biosemiotics to create a non-Cartesian information science. Semiotica 127(1/4), 169–198. Special issue on Biosemiotics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (1999c). What is a possible ontological and epistemological framework for a true universal “information science”? The suggestion of a cybersemiotics. In: Hofkirchner, W. (Ed.) The Quest for a Unified Theory of Information: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, 1996, Vienna, Austria. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach, pp. 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2000a). On the connection between cognitive semantics and ethological concepts of motivation: A possible bridge between embodiment in cognitive semantics and the motivation concept in ethology. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 7(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2000b). The relation between the semiotic and the informational research programs in the quest for a united theory for information, cognition and communication, Proceedings from the 7th International Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies/Association Internationale de Semiotioue (IASS-AIS): Sign Processes in Complex Systems, Dresden, University of Technology, October 6–11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2000c). Cybersemiotics as a suggestion for FIS. In: Proceedings of The World Congress of the Systems Sciences and ISSS 2000, International Society for the Systems Sciences, 44 h Annual Meeting, July 16–22, 2000, Toronto, Ontario Canada. Article No. 20150 – CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2000d). Trans-scientific frameworks of knowing: complementarity views of the different types of human knowledge. Yearbook Edition of Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17(5), 433–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2001a). Cybersemiotics and Umweltlehre. Semiotica 134(1/4), 779–814. Special issue on Jakob von Uexkull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2001b). Cybersemiotics, biosemiotics and ecosemiotics. In: Tarasti, F. (Ed.) 1ST congress paper, Nordic Baltic Summer Institute for Semiotic and Structural Studies. Ecosemiotics: Studies in Environmental Semiosis, semiotics of Biocybernetic Bodies, Human/too Human/Posthuman. Part IV, June 12–21, 2001, in Imatra, Finland. pp. 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2001c). Ecosemiotic and cybersemiotics. Sign System Studies 29(7), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2004). Peirce’s panethestic scientific mysticism. Proceedings from Symposium on Peirce’s Religious Writing. Denver, May 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, A., Brier, S. (2001). Signs, information, and consciousness. SYSTEMS – Journal of Transdisciplinary Systems Science 5(1,2), 2000; Polish Systems Society, Wroclaw, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeley, J. (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1997). How is the universe perfused with signs? In: Spinks, C. W., Deely, J. (Eds.) Semiotics. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1997). Physiosemiosis and semiotics. In: Spinks, C. W., Deely, J. (Eds.) Semiotics. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2001). Physiosemiosis in the semiotic spiral: A play of musement. International Colloquium “The Semiotic Threshold from Nature to Culture”, University of Kassel, Feb. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. D., Newton, N. (1998). Three paradoxes of phenomenal consciousness: Bridging the explanatory gap. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5(4), 419–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C. (2000). Transdisciplinarity, theory-zapping and the growth of knowledge. Semiotica 131(3/4), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkeby, O. F. (1997). Event and body-mind. An outline of a post-postmodern approach to phenomenology. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 4(2/3), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerner, S. J. (1993). Chaos and the Evolving Ecological Universe, the World Future General Evolution Studies, Vol. 7. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1998). Surfaces inside surfaces. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 5(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980). The Self-Organizing Universe. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1995). The Interconnected Universe, Conceptual Foundations of Transdisciplinary Unified Theory. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on Self-reference. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1970/71). Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour I and II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1973). Die Rückseite des Spiegels: Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. Munchen: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. M. (1969). Information, Mechanism and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marijuan, P. C. (1998). Foreword: Foundations of information science. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 5(4), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (2000). The nature of the laws of nature. Yearbook Edition of Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Systems Research 17(5), 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., Narela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The realization of the Living. London: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merell, F. (1996). Signs Grow: Semiosis of Life Processes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (2001). Introduction to Ecosemiosis, Tarasti, lSI Congress papers, Nordic Baltic Summer Institute for Semiotic and Structural Studies Part IV, June 12–21, 2001 in Imatra, Finland: Ecosemiotics: Studies in Environmental Semiosis, Semiotics of the Biocybernetic Bodies, Human/too Human/ Post Human, pp. 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (2002). Semiotic machines. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 9(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ort, N., Marcus, P. (1999). Niklas Luhmann: Sign as form – A comment. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 6(3), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–58). Collected Papers, Vol. I–VIII. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., Burks, A. (Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical, Vol. 1 (1867–1893). Houser, N., Kloesel, C. (Eds.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1995). Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J., Bateson, G. (1987). Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: Norton (Original 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santaella Braga, L. (1999). Peirce and biology. Semiotica 127(1/4), 5–21. Special Issue: Biosemiotica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1967). What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell and Mind and Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Original 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1976). Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1989). The Sign & Its Masters. Sources in Semiotics VIII. New York: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, T. (1997). Information and Meaning: An Evolutionary Perspective. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uexkull, J. von (1934). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds. In: Schiller, C. H. (Ed.) (1957) Instinctive Behavior. The Development of a Modern Concept. New York: International Universities Press. pp. 5–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexkull, T. von, Geigges, W, Herrmann, J. M. (1993). Endosemiosis. Semiotica 96(1/2), 5–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd Ed. New York: MIT Press and John Wiley & Sons (Orginal 1948).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., Flores, F. (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigation, 3rd Ed., translated by Anscombe G. E. M. New York: Mac Millian.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National University of Singapore, University Scholars Programme, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore

    Dr. Donald Favareau

Authors
  1. Dr. Donald Favareau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Favareau, D. (2009). The Cybersemiotic Model of Communication: An Evolutionary View on the Threshold between Semiosis and Informational Exchange. In: Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9650-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation