The Climate Change Regime and the Arctic Region

Chapter
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 50)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the climate change regime from an arctic perspective. The chapter poses a number of questions about the ability of the regime to take appropriate account of arctic interests in its efforts to mitigate climate change and adapt where impacts are not prevented. The chapter is divided into four components, a brief history of the regime, its approach to mitigation, efforts to date on adaptation, and the future of the regime. The history of the regime tracks its evolution through the IPCC, the UNFCCC, the Kyoto Protocol, and its implementation. The section on mitigation describes the emission reduction targets in the Kyoto Protocol and the various mechanisms available to meet these targets. The adaptation section considers provisions in the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, and their implementation to date. The final section considers the future of the regime and the promise it holds for addressing arctic concerns over the adequacy of mitigation, adaptive capacity, and the specific vulnerability of this region. In light of the inadequacy of the global response to climate change to date, the chapter discusses how arctic interests have been represented in the climate change regime to date.

Keywords

Europe Expense Lost Aires Bali 

References

  1. Bachelder, A. (2000). Using credit trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Law and Practice, 9, 281–298.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, R., & Baumert, K. (2005). Growing in the greenhouse: Protecting the climate by putting development first. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, C. (1997). Facilitating joint implementation under the framework convention on climate change: Toward a greenhouse gas emission reduction protocol. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 14(5), 356–367.Google Scholar
  4. Brunnée, J. (2000). A fine balance: Facilitation and enforcement in the design of a compliance regime for the Kyoto Protocol. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 13, 223–270.Google Scholar
  5. Cosbey, A., Murphy, D., Drexhage, J., & Balint, J. (2005). Which way forward? Issues in developing an effective climate eegime after 2012. Winnipeg, MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno_741.
  6. Doelle, M. (2005). From hot air to action? Climate change, compliance and the future of international environmental law. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
  7. Doelle, M. (2006). The cat came back, or the nine lives of the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Enveronmental Law and Practice, 16, 261–288.Google Scholar
  8. Doelle, M. (2007). Global carbon trading and climate change mitigation in Canada: Options for the use of the Kyoto mechanisms. In S. Bernstein, et al. (Eds.), A globally integrated climate policy for Canada (pp. 179–202). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 1992, 31 I.L.M. 849. Retrieved August 10, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/a/18p2a01.pdf.
  10. Grice, A. (2006, February 8). Seven years to save planet, says PM. The Independent.Google Scholar
  11. Hanafi, A. G. (1998). Joint implementation: Legal and institutional issues for an effective international program to combat climate change. The Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22, 441–508.Google Scholar
  12. Hare, W., & Meinshausen, M. (2004). How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided? PIK Report No. 93. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchGoogle Scholar
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2005). Carbon dioxide capture and storage summary for policy makers. IPCC Special Report by Working Group III.Google Scholar
  14. Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto, 10 December 1997, 37 I.L.M. 22 (1998).Google Scholar
  15. McSmith, A. (2006, January 27). Cameron helps launch climate change alliance. The Independent.Google Scholar
  16. Nilsson, A. (2007). A changing Arctic climate: Science and policy in the Arctic climate impact assessment. Linkoping: Lingkoping University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Stewart, R. B., Connaughton, J. L., & Foxhall, L. C. (2001). Designing an international greenhouse gas emissions trading system. Natural Resources and Environmental, 15, 160–164.Google Scholar
  18. Stewart, R. B., Anderson, D., Aslam, M. A., Eyre, C., Jones, G., Sands, P., Stuart, M., & Yamin, F. (2000). The clean development mechanism: Building international public-private partnerships under the Kyoto Protocol. UN Doc. UNCTAD/GD5/GF5B/Misc.7.Google Scholar
  19. Thomas, W. L., Basurto, D., & Taylor, G. (2001). Creating a favorable climate for CDM investment in North America. Natural Resources and Environmental, 15, 172–175.Google Scholar
  20. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Report of the conference of the parties on its seventh session, 29 October–10 November 2001, U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1 (Decisions 1/CP.7 – 14/CP.7), FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2 (Decisions 15/CP.7 – 19/CP.7), FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.3 (Decisions 20/CP.7 – 24/CP.7), FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.4 (Decisions 25/CP.7 – 39/CP.7 & Resolution 1/CP.7 – 2/CP.7). (Marrakesh Accords). Draft CMP decisions in Marrakesh Accords formally adopted at the first meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol in Montreal Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  21. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005a). 3/CMP.1 Modalities and procedures for a clean development mechanism as defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  22. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005b). 5/CMP.1 Modalities and procedures for afforestation and reforestation project activities under the clean development mechanism in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  23. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005c). 13/CMP.1 Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  24. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005d). 17/CMP.1 Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry activities under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  25. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005e). 18/CMP.1 Criteria for cases of failure to submit information relating to estimates of greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from activities under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  26. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005f). 27/CMP.1 Procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
  27. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (1988). Resolution 43/53, 70th plenary meeting, 6 December 1988.Google Scholar
  28. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (1989). Resolution 44/206, and 44/207, 85th plenary meeting, 22 December 1989.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (1990). Resolution 45/212, 71st plenary meeting, 21 December 1990.Google Scholar
  30. Vidal, J. (2006, February 8). Sweden plans to be the world’s first oil-free economy. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  31. Watson, R. T., Albritton, D. L., Barker, T., Bashmakov, I. A., Canziani, & O., Christ, et al. (Eds.) (2002). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report. A contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Werksman, J. (1998). The clean development mechanism: Unwrapping the ‘Kyoto Surprise’. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 7, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiser, G. (1997). Joint implementation: Incentives for private sector mitigation of global climate change. Georgetown International Law Review, 9(2), 447–488.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, D. V. (2007). The clean development mechanism: Climate change equity and the south-north divide. Berlin: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine and Environmental Law Institute, Dalhousie Law SchoolHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations