The Implementation of the Bologna Process in Italy

  • Roberto Moscati
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 26)

Abstract

Generally speaking, higher education in Italy is in the middle of a critical transition to a new era and yet is following a non-linear path whose direction changes according to the shifting ascendancy of the countervailing forces. To explain this peculiarity one must return to the 1960s, when all systems of higher education in Europe were affected by a sudden and consistent increase in social demand. To cope with the new situation, a number of reforms were implemented to diversify the systems, either with the creation of parallel tracks or with the introduction of different stages. In Italy, the response to demand was the introduction of a completely open-door system, abolishing any kind of filter from the secondary to the tertiary level of education. The result was a flood of students coming from different secondary school tracks (some of which were not originally intended to lead to the tertiary level) and with a very different cultural capital (‘habitus’), while the university remained unchanged in its structure and quality of curricula. As a consequence, the number of university dropouts increased substantially and the output of tertiary education institutions remained unrelated to changes in the labour market.

Keywords

Europe Income Expense Rebalance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to all participants at the Douro 6 Seminar but in particular to Alberto Amaral and Amélia Veiga for their comments and suggestions on the first version of this text which has been derived in part from an essay (Moscati 2006) included in the 2006 International Handbook of Higher Education.

References

  1. Archer, M. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Boffo, S., P. Dubois and R. Moscati. “The Changing University Governance in France and in Italy.” Paper presented at the 28th EAIR Forum, Rome, 30 August–1 September, 2006a.Google Scholar
  3. Boffo, S., P. Dubois and R. Moscati. Il governo dell’università: Rettori e Presidenti in Italia e in Francia (The University Governance: Rectors and Presidents in Italy and France). Milano: Guerini e Associati, 2006b.Google Scholar
  4. Boffo, S., R. Moscati and M. Vaira. “The Academic Workplace. Country Report: Italy.” In Enders, J. and E. de Weert (eds). The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe. Frankfurt/Main: GEW, 2004, 243–263.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. La Distinction (The Distinction). Paris: Les éditions de minuit, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Capano, G. “La riforma universitaria: l’anarchica attuazione di un sistema tecnocratico” (“The University Reform: An Anarchist Realization of a Technocratic System”). Il Mulino 6 (2002): 1154–1163.Google Scholar
  7. Cerych, L. and P. Sabatier. Great Expectations and Mixed Performances: The Implementation of Higher Education Reforms in Europe. Trentham: Trentham Books, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, B.R. Academic Power in Italy: Bureaucracy and Oligarchy in a National University System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, B.R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, R. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. De Maio, A. Una svolta per l’università (A Turning Point for the University). Milano: Il Sole-24Ore, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Frey, L. and E. Ghignoni (eds). L’importanza della riforma universitaria in corso in Italia (The Relevance of the University Reform in Italy). Milano: Franco Angeli, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. Luzzatto, G. 2001: L’odissea dell’università nuova (2001: The Odyssey of the New University). Milano: La Nuova Italia, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. Moscati, R. “Italy.” In Forest, J. and P. Altbach (eds). International Handbook of Higher Education. Vol. II. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006, 811–827.Google Scholar
  15. Moscati, R., A. Amaral, J. Gines-Mora, P. Dubois, O. Fulton, D.F. Westerheijden, S. Schwarz, U. Teichler, A. Cavalli, G. Luzzatto, D. Rizzi, G. Ragone, S. Boffo and G. Maggioni. “Monitoring Project of the Italian University Reform” (UNIMON). Unpublished research report, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Neave, G. On Stakeholders, Cheshire Cats and Seers: Changing Visions of the University. Enschede: CHEPS/University of Twente, 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Pontremoli, S. and G. Luzzatto (eds). Università: La riforma è iniziata (University: The Reform Has Begun). Milano: La Nuova Italia, 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Trow, M. Problems in the Transition From Elite to Mass Higher Education. Paris: OECD, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Moscati
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Di Milano-BiccocaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations