Abstract
Nanomaterials are not technological newcomers. However the use of an integrative concept to describe the diverse and complex array of these very small products is new. This chapter aims to describe some of the attitudes and risk perception studies about these materials. Furthermore it will be presented an empirical research where we will introduce some of the psychological factors that could help in understanding the psychometrics of the nanomaterials risk perception. One could conclude that despite the agreement that there is a widespread lack of knowledge, people can still apply attitudes and deduce a risk perception estimate that differs essentially according to the application domains. Furthermore risk perception about nanomaterials can be easily modified if some new negative phenomena arrive. In this context the design of a good risk communication strategy is particularly important especially because according to many studies and the one to be presented, the nano experts have difficulty in understanding what the factors that underlie lay people's judgments are.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
DuPuis, E.M. (2000) Not in my body: BGH and the rise of organic milk, Agriculture and Human Values17, 285–295.
Cohen, C.E. (1981) Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40, 441–452.
Collins, A.M., and Loftus, E.F. (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing, Psychological Review 82, 407–428.
Eiser, J.R., Popadec, T.J., Reicher, S.D., and Stevenage, S.V. (1998) Muddy waters and heavy metal: Time and attitudes guide judgements of pollution, Journal of Environmental Psychology 18, 199–208.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B. (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Policy Sciences 9, 127–152.
Festinger, L. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations 7, 117–140.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Flynn, J., Slovic, P., and Mertz, C. (1994) Gender, race and perception of environmental health risks, Risk Analysis 14, 1101–1108.
Freudenburg, W.R., and Pastor, S.K. (1992) NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the syndromes, Journal of Social Issues 48(4), 39–61.
Garcia—Marques, T., and Mackie, D.M. (2001) The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing, Social Cognition 19, 9–34.
Hastie, R. (1983) Social inference, Annual Review of Psychology 34, 511–542.
Hastie, R., and Park, B. (1986) The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory based or on-line, Psychological Review 93, 258–268.
Jacoby, J., Morrin, M., Jaccard, J., Gurhan, Z., Kuss, A., and Maheswaran, D. (2002) Mapping attitude formation as a function of information input: Online processing models of attitude formation, Journal of Consumer Psychology 12, 21–34.
Lima, M.L. (2004) Images of the public in the debates about risk: Consequences for participation, Portuguese Journal of Social Science 2, 149–163.
Mata, A., Antunes, D., Gaspar de Carvalho, R., Palma-Oliveira, J.M., Lino, J., Luís, S., Marques, N., Silveira, C. and Alves, I. (2006) Psychological Monitoring: Understanding Irrational People, in C. Guedes Soares and E. Zio (Eds.), Safety and Reliability for Managing Risk, Estoril, Portugal.
Palma-Oliveira, J.M. (1992) Stress ambiental: Um selectivo ponto da situação e modelo explicativo [Environmental stress: A selective point of view and explanatory model], Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Psicologia 28, 13–77.
Palma-Oliveira, J.M. (2000) A New Theory for the Explanation of the NIMBY Effect, in M. Cottam, D. Harvey, R. Pape and J. Tait (Eds.), Foresight and Precaution, A A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1167–1171.
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., and Fazio, R.H. (1990) The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 614–622.
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Kardes, F.R., and Sansone, C. (1991) Remembering less and inferring more: Effects of time of judgment on inferences about unknown attributes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 546–554.
Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., and Slovic, P. (2004) Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology, Risk Analysis 24, 1289–1299.
Siegrist, M., Keller, C., Kastenholz, H., Frey, S., and Wiek, A. (2007) Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards, Risk Analysis 27, 59–69.
Simon, H.A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99–118.
Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of risk, Science 236, 280–285.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichenstein, S. (1980) Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk, in R.C. Schwing and W.A. Albers, Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?, Plenum Press, New York.
Taylor, S. and Brown, J. (1988) Illusions and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health, Psychological Bulletin 103, 193–210.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1971) Belief in the law of small numbers, Psychological Bulletin 76, 105–110.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology 4, 207–232.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science 185, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 211, 453–458.
Zajonc, R.B. (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Monograph Supplement 9, 1–27
Willis, H., DeKay, M., Fischhoff ,B., and Morgan, M. (2005) Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions, Risk Analysis 25, 405–428.
Baum, A; Fleming, I. (1993) Implications of psychological research on stress and technological accidents, American Psycholgist 48, 665–672.
Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., Fischler, C., Hampel, J., Jackson, J., Kronberger, N., Mejlgaard, N., Revuelta, G., Schreiner, C., Torgersen, H., and Wagner, W. (2006) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends. European Commission's Directorate-General for Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Palma-Oliveira, J.M., Carvalho, R.G.D., Luis, S., Vieira, M. (2009). Knowing Much While Knowing Nothing. In: Linkov, I., Steevens, J. (eds) Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9490-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9491-0
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)