Abstract
This chapter discusses the extent to which new forms of multi-actor and multi-level governance may actually induce governance failure. The case to explore is the implementation phase of the Bird- and Habitat directives (BHDs, European nature conservation policies) within the Netherlands, in which new forms of governance were introduced a decade ago. Governance failure is conceptualised through the various dimensions of the policy arrangements approach (1) actors and coalitions, (2) power and influence, (3) policy discourses and (4) rules of the game. The findings show that new forms of governance were only able to address some of the existing problems, while it could not prevent new problems from arising. For instance, under the new arrangements, power struggles became more overt, discursive conflicts occurred between the state department and the lower administrative levels as well as between advocates and adversaries, and rules of the game faced similar contestations. What becomes manifest, at least for this case study, is the persistently dominant role of the state in orchestrating the policy-making process, while being subject to Europeanization processes at the same time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albrow, D. (1996). The global age. State and society beyond modernity. Oxford: Polity.
Arts, B. and Leroy, P. (2006). Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bastmeijer, C. and Verschuuren, J. (2003). Knelpunten bij de uitvoering van de natuurbeschermingswetgeving in Nederland: Onderzoek in het kader van het IBO Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijnen; Eindrapport: in opdracht van het Ministerie van Financiën. Tilburg: Centre for Questions of Law, University of Tilburg.
Börzel, T. (2000). Why there is no Southern problem: on environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 141–162.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
de Baas, J. (1995). Bestuurskunde in hoofdlijnen, invloed op beleid. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hajer, M., Van Tatenhove, J. and Laurent, C. (2004). Nieuwe vormen van governance: een essay over nieuwe vormen van bestuur met een empirische uitwerking naar de domeinen van voedselveiligheid en gebiedsgericht beleid. Amsterdam: RIVM.
Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy (pp. 13–35). New York: Oxford University Press.
Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private actors and the state: internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance — An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 15(1), 41–63.
Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance: new government — society interactions. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (2000). Levels of governing: interactions as a central concept. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy (pp. 142–164). New York: Oxford University Press.
Marks, G. and Hooghe, L. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: state-centric v. multilevel governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.
Milieu- en Natuurplanbureau (ordered by the RIVM) (2002). Natuurbalans 2001. Alphen aan de Rijn: Kluwer.
Ministerie van Landbouw en Visserij (1990). Natuurbeleidsplan: Regeringsbeslissing. Den Haag: SDU-uitgeverij.
Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (2000). Aanwijzing speciale beschermings- zones Vogelrichtlijn: Nota van antwoord. Den Haag.
Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Voedselkwaliteit (2004). Reactiedocument aanmelding habitatrichtlijngebieden. Den Haag.
Ministeries van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Volkshuisvestiging, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, Ontwikkelingssamenwerking, Verkeer en Waterstaat (2000). Natuur voor mensen, mensen voor natuur: Nota natuur, bos en landschap in de 21 e eeuw, Den Haag.
Osieck, E. (1998). Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijn: hoekstenen van het Europese natuurbeleid. De Levende Natuur, 99(6), 204–231.
Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice: an analysis of the institutional and development framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 35–72). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Peters, B. (2000). Governance and comparative politics. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy (pp. 36–53). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pierre, J. and Peters, B. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. London: Macmillan.
Rhodes, R. (2000). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy (pp. 54–90). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sabatier, P. (Ed.) (1999). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Top, M. and Van der Zouwen, M. (2000). Europees natuurbeleid in Nederland: een pionier die zichzelf in de weg loopt. Landschap, 17(2), 81–96.
Van der Zouwen, M. (2006). Nature policy between trends and traditions: dynamics in nature policy arrangements in the Yorkshire Dales, Doñpana and the Veluwe. Delft: Uitgeverij
Eburon. Van der Zouwen, M. and Van Tatenhove, J. (2002). Implementatie van Europees natuurbeleid in Nederland. Wageningen: Natuurplanbureau.
Van Kersbergen, K. and van Waarden, F. (2001). Shifts in governance: problems of legitimacy and accountability. Den Haag: NWO.
Van Kersbergen, K. and van Waarden, F. (2004). “Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–172.
Van Kleef, S. (2004). De ontwikkeling van het begrip “beschermd landschap”. Amersfoort: Raad voor het Landelijk Gebied.
Van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B. and Leroy, P. (2000). Political modernization and the environment: the renewal of environmental policy arrangements. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
VNO-NCW (2002). Soortenbescherming in Nederland: Beleidsvisie. Den Haag.
Werkgroep Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijnen (2003). Nederland op slot? De Europese en Nederlandse natuurbeschermingswetgeving nader bezien: Eindrapportage van de werkgroep Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijnen. Den Haag: Interdepartementaal Beleidsonderzoek.
Yin, R. (1991). Case study research. Design and methods. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnouts, R., Arts, B. (2009). Environmental Governance Failure: The ‘Dark Side’ of an Essentially Optimistic Concept. In: Arts, B., Lagendijk, A., Houtum, H. (eds) The Disoriented State: Shifts in Governmentality, Territoriality and Governance. Environment & Policy, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9480-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9480-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9479-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9480-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)