French Philosophy of Technology

  • Daniel Parrochia
Part of the Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science book series (BSPS, volume 276)

Is there, actually, a French philosophy of technology? If the answer may be “yes”, we can point out that such a philosophy does not have a clear beginning. Of course we must go back to René Descartes (1596–1650) to find the first formulation of such a thought and the earliest idea that technology and applied sciences are essentially tools to understand and master the world. This matrix of all the later optimistic visions of science appears in the most famous work of the father of rationalism, Le discours de la méthode (part VI), when Descartes explains that, thanks to technology, man may become like master and owner of all of nature. 1 In the same way, we read in Les principes de la philosophie, another anthology piece saying that science is a tree, the roots of which are metaphysics, the trunk is physics, and the different branches are the three applied sciences known at the time (mechanics, medicine and morals).2 These ideas are very significant in the context of the period, when the increase of population, the expansion of cities and towns, and a confident faith in the new Galilean physics made things looked rather hopeful. Friend of Villebressieu, 3 a prolific engineer who made numerous inventions, spent his fortune building them and finally ruined himself, Descartes was an expert in technology, especially lifting devices, about which he wrote a notice enclosed with a letter to Huyghens:4 “The explanation of machines with the help of which a small force can move heavy weights”. 5 But his knowledge of basic machines (pulley, screw, whee or wheel, lever, inclined plane) does not make of Descartes a real philosopher of technology. As Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), who had one of the first calculators made by some craftsman and wrote a few things about it,6 Descartes was, above all, an actor of the technical revolution. But probably too close to it, he could not think a lot about the break it caused in culture. As a matter of fact, we only find, in Les principes de la philosophie (IV, 204), the famous metaphors comparing nature with an immense engine, which produces trees and fruits as a clock gives the time. Which does not mean that the “factory of earth and sky” may be reduced to a human trick. As Descartes wrote in the same passage “all rules of mechanics belong to physics, so everything which is artificial is also natural”. Here we must be careful and not misinterpret these words. In spite of the well-known Animal-machine thesis, we cannot read this sentence in the reverse order. The philosopher never said that nature is entirely mechanical, because the natural factory is not a human fact. The boss is God. His technology is subtler than ours, His intentions and goals are beyond our belief. So, some kind of deep-rooted finality remains a vivid ground of cartesianism, which prevents it turning into a flat materialism.


Technological System Steam Engine French Philosophy Optimistic Vision Real Philosopher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bachelard Gaston (1951), L’activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard Gaston (1953), Le matérialisme rationnel, Paris, PUF, 3rd ed., 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Barthes Roland (1970), Mythologies, Paris, Point-Seuil.Google Scholar
  4. Baudrillard Jean (1968), Le système des objets, Paris, Gonthier-Médiations, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Bayle F., D. Bourg, R. Debray, D. Ettigoffer, A. Finkielkraut, M.-A. Hermitte, B. Jacomy, D. Janicaud, B. Latour, R. Laufer, P. Lévy, A. Moles, J. Perrin, A. Picon, Ph. Quéau, M. Sicard, F.Sigaud, B. Stiegler, P. Virilio, J. Weissenbach (2000), interrogés par R. Scheps, Paris, Point-Seuil.Google Scholar
  6. Beaune Jean-Claude (1980a), L’automate et ses mobiles, Paris, Flammarion.Google Scholar
  7. Beaune Jean-Claude (1980b), La technologie introuvable, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
  8. Beaune Jean-Claude (1983), Le vagabond et la machine, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  9. Beaune Jean-Claude (1988), Les spectres mécaniques, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  10. Beaune Jean-Claude (1998), Philosophie des milieux techniques, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  11. Beaune Jean-Claude (2002), Le balancier du monde, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  12. Bergson Henri (1970), Œuvres, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  13. Blamont Jacques (1993), Le chiffre et le songe, histoire politique de la découverte, Paris, Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  14. Breton Philippe (1987), Histoire de l’informatique, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
  15. Breton Philippe, Rieu Alain-Marc, Tinland Frank (1990), La techno-science en question, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  16. Canguilhem Georges (1967), La connaissance de la vie, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  17. Carnot Sadi (1824), Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu, Paris, Blanchard, 1953, reed. Gabay, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. Chazal Gérard (1995), Le miroir automate, Introduction à une philosophie de l’informatique, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  19. Chazal Gérard (1997), Formes, figures et réalité, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  20. Chazal Gérard (2000), Les réseaux du sens: de l’informatique aux neurosciences, Seyssel, Champ Vallon, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. Chazal Gérard (2002), Interfaces: enquêtes sur les mondes intermédiaires, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  22. Chazal Gérard (2004), Les médiations théoriques, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  23. Chazal Gérard (2006), L’ordre humain ou le déni de nature, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  24. Comte Auguste (1830), Cours de philosophie positive, vol. 1, 1st lesson, Paris, Rouen frères (Bachelier); The Positive Philosophy of August Comte, transl. & condensation, H. Martineau, 1853.Google Scholar
  25. Condorcet Marquis de (1799), “Éloge de M. de Vaucanson”, in Éloges des académiciens de l’Académie royale des sciences, vol. 3, Paris.Google Scholar
  26. Coriolis Gaspard Gustave de (1819), Du calcul de l’effet des machines, Paris, Carilian-Goeury, 1829.Google Scholar
  27. Couffignal Louis (1952), Les machines à penser, Paris, Minuit.Google Scholar
  28. Dagognet François (1973), Écriture et iconographie, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
  29. Dagognet François (1989), Éloge de l’objet, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
  30. Dagognet François (1995), L’invention de notre monde, l’industrie : pour quoi et comment?, Fougères, Encre Marine.Google Scholar
  31. Daumas Maurice (1962), Histoire des techniques, 5 vol., Paris, PUF, “Quadrige”, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Daumas Maurice (1953), Les instruments scientifiques au XVIIe et au XVIIIe siècle, Reed., Gabay, 2004.Google Scholar
  33. Debray Régis (1991), Cours de Médiologie générale, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  34. Descartes (1953), Œuvres, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  35. Dupuy Jean-Pierre (2006), Retour de Tchernobyl, journal d’un homme en colère, Paris, Seuil. Trans. J. Wilkinson, The Technological Society, New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1964.Google Scholar
  36. Ellul Jacques (1954), La technique ou l’enjeu du siècle, Paris, Armand Colin, 1954.Google Scholar
  37. Ellul Jacques (1980), The technological system, New York, Continuum.Google Scholar
  38. Ellul Jacques (1990), The technological bluff, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, Grand Rapids, Eerdemans.Google Scholar
  39. Friedmann Georges(1946), Problèmes humains du machinisme industriels, Reed, Paris, Gallimard, 1955.Google Scholar
  40. Gille Bertrand (1978a), Histoire des techniques, Paris, Gallimard, Encyclopédie de la Pléiade.Google Scholar
  41. Gille Bertrand (1978b), Les ingénieurs de la Renaissance, Paris, Seuil, “Point-Sciences”.Google Scholar
  42. Gille Bertrand (1980), Les mécaniciens grecs, la naissance de la technologie, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
  43. Gras Alain (1993), Grandeur et dépendance, sociologie des macro-systèmes techniques, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  44. Guillerme André (1983), Le temps de l’eau : la cité, l’eau et les techniques, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  45. Habermas Jürgen (1968), Technick und Wissenschaft als Ideologie, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
  46. Heidegger Martin (1954), “The Question Concerning Technology” in William Lovitt, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper & Row, 1977, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
  47. Henry Michel, (1976), Marx, Paris, Gallimard, 1976.Google Scholar
  48. Henry Michel (1987), La Barbarie, Paris, Grasset.Google Scholar
  49. Hottois Gilbert (1984), Le signe et la technique, la philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier.Google Scholar
  50. Hottois Gilbert (1996), Entre symboles & technosciences, un itinéraire philosophique, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  51. Jacomy Bruno (1990), Une histoire des techniques, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
  52. Janicaud Dominique (1985), La puissance du rationnel, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  53. Koyré Alexandre (1981), “Les philosophes et la machines”, in Études d’histoire de la pensée philosophique, Paris, Gallimard, “Tel”.Google Scholar
  54. Ladrière Jean (1977), Les enjeux de la rationalité, le défi de la science et de la technologie aux cultures, Unesco, Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
  55. Laffitte Jacques (1932), Réflexion sur la science des machines, Reed, Paris, Vrin, 1972.Google Scholar
  56. Latil Pierre de (1953), Introduction à la cybernétique, la pensée artificielle, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  57. Latour Bruno (1988), “Le grand partage”, Revue du MAUSS, 1 (3); pp. 2764.Google Scholar
  58. Latour Bruno (1992), Aramis ou l’amour des techniques, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
  59. Lebeau André (1986), L’espace en héritage, Paris, Odile Jacob, 1986.Google Scholar
  60. Le Chatelier Henry Louis (1925), L’industrie, la science et l’organisation au XXe siècle, Paris, Dunod.Google Scholar
  61. Le Chatelier Henry Louis (1988), “Recherches expérimentales et théoriques sur les équilibres chimiques”, Annales des Mines, 13(2), p. 157.Google Scholar
  62. Lecourt Dominique (1990), Contre la peur, Paris, PUF., “Quadrige”, reed. 1999.Google Scholar
  63. Leroi-Gourhan André (1945), Milieux et techniques, Paris, Albin Michel, reed. 1973.Google Scholar
  64. Leroi-Gourhan André (1964), Le geste et la parole, vol. 1, Technique et langage, Paris, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  65. Leroi-Gourhan André (1965), vol. 2, La mémoire et les rythmes, Paris, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  66. Lévi-Strauss Claude (1962), La pensée sauvage, Paris, Plon.Google Scholar
  67. Lévi-Strauss Claude (1985), La potière jalouse, Paris, Plon.Google Scholar
  68. Lévy, Pierre (1987), La machine univers, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
  69. Lévy, Pierre (1991), L’idéographie dynamique, vers une imagination artificielle?Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
  70. Mac Luhan, Marshall (1994), Understanding Media, Reed, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. Maitte Bertrand (1981), La lumière, Paris, Seuil, “Point-Sciences”.Google Scholar
  72. Mauss Marcel (1948), Sociologie et Anthropologie, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  73. Mitcham Carl (1994), Thinking through Technology, the Path between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Moles Abraham (1970), Créativité et méthodes d’innovation, Paris, Fayard-Mame.Google Scholar
  75. Mumford Lewis (1963), Technics and Civilization, Harvest/HBJ Books.Google Scholar
  76. Mumford Lewis (1971), Myth of the machine: Technics and Human development, Harvest/HBJ books.Google Scholar
  77. Musso Pierre (1997), Télécommunication et philosophie des réseaux, la postérité paradoxale de Saint-Simon, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  78. Parrochia Daniel (1993), Philosophie des réseaux, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  79. Parrochia Daniel (1994), “A Historical Note on Artificial Life”, Acta Biotheoretica, 43, pp. 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Parrochia Daniel (1996) “Agorithmics and the Limits of Complexity”, Science in Context, 9 (1), pp. 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Parrochia Daniel (1998), La conception technologique, Paris, Hermès.Google Scholar
  82. Parrochia Daniel (2001), L’homme volant, épistémologie de l’aéronautique et des systèmes de navigation, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  83. Poncelet, Jean Victor (1829), Introduction à la mécanique industrielle, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1870.Google Scholar
  84. Ramunni Girolamo (1989), La physique du calcul, histoire de l’ordinateur, Paris, Hachette.Google Scholar
  85. Russo François (1955), Eléments de bibliographie d’histoire des sciences et des techniques, Paris, Hermann, 2nd ed., 1969.Google Scholar
  86. Russo François (1986), Introduction à l’histoire des techniques, Paris, Blanchard.Google Scholar
  87. Ruyer Raymond (1968), La cybernétique et l’origine de l’information, Paris, Flammarion.Google Scholar
  88. Ruyer Raymond (1971) Les nuisances idéologiques, Paris, Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
  89. Salomon Jean-Jacques (1984), Prométhée empêtré. La résistance au changement technique, Paris, Anthropos.Google Scholar
  90. Salomon Jean-Jacques (1986) Les enjeux du changement technologique, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
  91. Salomon Jean-Jacques (1992), Le destin technologique, Paris, Balland.Google Scholar
  92. Schuhl Pierre-Maxime (1947), Machinisme et philosophie, Paris, PUF., 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  93. Séris Jean-Pierre (1974), La théorie des jeux, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  94. Séris Jean-Pierre (1987), Machine et communication, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
  95. Séris Jean-Pierre (1994), La technique, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  96. Serres Michel (1990), Le contrat naturel, Paris, Bourin.Google Scholar
  97. Sfez Lucien (1998), La Santé Parfaite, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
  98. Sfez Lucien (2002), Technique et Idéologie, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
  99. Sigaut François (1994), “La technologie, une science humaine”, in F. Bayle, D. Bourg, R. Debray et al, L’empire des techniques, Paris, Seuil, “Point-Sciences”.Google Scholar
  100. Simondon Gilbert (1964), L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique (l’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information), Paris PUF., 2nd ed. J. Millon, “Krisis”, 1995.Google Scholar
  101. Simondon Gilbert (1969), Du mode d’existence des objets techniques, Paris, Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
  102. Stiegler Bernard (1996), La technique et le temps, 2 vol., Paris, Galilée.Google Scholar
  103. Tinland Frank (1991) (ed.), Systèmes naturels, systèmes artificiels, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  104. Tinland Frank (1994) (ed.), Ordre biologique, ordre technologique, Seyssel, Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  105. Virilio Paul (1977), Vitesse et politique, Paris, Galilée.Google Scholar
  106. Virilio Paul (1990), L’inertie polaire, Paris, Bourgois.Google Scholar
  107. Virilio Paul (1995), La vitesse de libération, Paris, Galilée.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Parrochia
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté de philosophieUniversité Jean Moulin Lyon 3LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations