Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science ((BSPS,volume 276))

The rise of cognitive science in the last half-century has been accompanied by a considerable amount of philosophical activity. No other area within analytic philosophy in the second half of that period has attracted more attention or produced more publications. Philosophical work relevant to cognitive science has become a sprawling field (extending beyond analytic philosophy) which no one can fully master, although some try and keep abreast of the philosophical literature and of the essential scientific developments. Due to the particular nature of its subject, it touches on a multitude of distinct special branches in philosophy and in science. It has also become quite a difficult, complicated and technical field, to the point of being nearly impenetrable for philosophers or scientists coming from other fields or traditions. Finally, it is contentious: Cognitive science is far from having reached stability, it is still widely regarded with suspicion, philosophers working within its confine have sharp disagreements amongst themselves, and philosophers standing outside, especially (but not only) of non-analytic persuasion, are often inclined to see both cognitive science and its accompanying philosophy as more or less confused or even deeply flawed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Amit Daniel (1989), Modeling Brain Function — The World of Attractor Neural Networks, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson James A. and Rosenfeld Edward (1988) (eds.), Neurocomputing. Foundations of Research, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (1990), “Connexionnisme et cognition: à la recherche des bonnes questions”, Revue de Synthèse, série générale CXI, 1–2, Janv.–Juin 1990, pp. 95–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (1992), “From paleo to neo-connectionism”, in G. van der Vijver (ed.), New Perspectives on Cybernetics, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (1995), “Logique, raisonnement et psychologie”, in J. Dubucs and P. Lepage (eds.), Méthodes logiques pour les sciences cognitives, Paris, Hermes, pp. 25–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (1998), “Turing: Pensée du calcul, calcul de la pensée”, in F. Nef and D. Vernant, Les années 1930: réaffirmation du formalisme, Paris, Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (2004) (ed.), Introduction aux sciences cognitives, 2nd ed., Paris, Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (2005), “Les neurosciences cognitives: une nouvelle ‘nouvelle science de l’esprit’?”, PSN – Psychiatrie, sciences humaines, neurosciences, 3(12), pp. 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (2006a), “Cognitive Science”, in L. Kritzman (ed.), The Columbia History of Twentieth Century French Thought, New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler Daniel (2006b), “Phenomenology in cognitive science and artificial intelligence”, in H. Dreyfus and M. Wrathall (eds.), A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 377–393.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bain A. (1893), “The respective spheres and mutual helps of introspection and psychophysical experiment in psychology”, Mind, 2, pp. 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow Jerome, Cosmides Leda and Tooby John (1992) (eds.), The Adapted Mind. Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel W. and G. Graham (1999) (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett M.R. and P.M.S. Hacker (2003), Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez J. L. (2003), Thinking Without Words, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez J. L. Marcel A., Eilan N. (1995) (eds.), The Body and the Self, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz Alain (1997), Le sens du mouvement, Paris, Odile Jacob. The Brain’s Sense of Movement, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz Alain (1999) (ed.), Leçons sur le corps, le cerveau et l’esprit, Paris, Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle J. (2003), Philosophy and Neuroscience. A Ruthlessly Reductive Account, Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block Ned (1995), “On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness”, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 2, p. 1995, pp. 227–247. Reprinted in Flanagan and Güzeldere, 1997, Block, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block Ned (2007), Consciousness, Function, and Representation. Collected papers, vol. 1, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonatti Luca (1994), “Propositional Reasoning by Model?”, Psychological Review, 101(4), pp. 725–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddon-Mitchell D. and Jackson F. (1996), Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook Andrew (1994), Kant and the Mind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers Peter, Laurence Stephen and Stich Stephen (2005) (eds.), The Innate Mind,1: Structure snf Content, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers David (1996), The Conscious Mind, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers David (2002) (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Changeux Jean-Pierre (2003), L’homme de vérité, Paris, Odile Jacob,

    Google Scholar 

  • Changeux Jean-Pierre (1983), L’homme neuronal, Paris, Fayard. Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind, trans. Laurence Garey, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (2000), New Horizons in the Study of Mind and Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (2002), On Nature and Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark Andy (1989) Microcognition. Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L. (1989), “The Logic of Social Exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task”, Cognition, 31, pp. 187–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie F. (1999), What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozic Mikaël (2005), “Fondements cognitifs du choix en rationalité limitée”, PhD dissertation, Université de Paris-Sorbonne (Paris IV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig E. (1998) (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson R.J., Scherer K.R. and Goldsmith H.H. (2003) (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies Martin (2005), “Cognitive science”, in F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.), 2005, pp.358–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett Daniel C. (1969), Content and Consciousness, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett Daniel C. (1978), Brainstorms, Montgomery, VT, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett Daniel C. (1986), “The Logical Geography of Computational Approaches”, in M. Brand and R. M. Harnish, (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, pp. 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske Fred (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus Hubert L. (1972), What Computers Can’t Do, New York, Harper & Row; augm. edition: What Computers Still Can’t Do, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus Hubert L. and Harrison Hall (1982) (eds.), Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupoux Emmanuel (2001) (eds.), Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman J., Bates L.E., Johnson M.H., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D. and Plunkett D. (1996), Rethinking Innateness. A Connectionist Perspective on Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield N.J., Levinson Stephen and Stephen C. (2006) (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction, Oxford, Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan O. and G. Güzeldere (eds.) (1997), The Nature of Consciousness. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor Jerry (2000), The Mind Doesn’t Work that Way. The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor Jerry (1983), The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor Jerry (1975), The Language of Thought, New York, Thos. Crowell; repr. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H. (1985), The Mind’s New Science, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga M. (2000), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer Gerd and Reinhard Selten (2002) (eds.), Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttenplan Samuel (1994) (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford & Cambridge, Massachusetts, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman P.M. (1982), Energy, Force, and Matter, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield Gary (1995), “Remaking the science of the mind. Psychology as natural science”, in C. Fox, R. Porter and R. Wokler (eds.), Inventing Human Science. Eighteeth-Century Domains, Berkeley & Los Angeles, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield Gary (1997), “Wundt and psychology as science: Disciplinary transformations”, Perspectives on Science, 5(3), pp. 349–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield Gary (2002), “Psychology, philosophy, and cognitive science: Reflections on the history and philosophy of experimental psychology”, Mind and Language, 17(3), pp. 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland John (1998), Having Thought, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil John (2004) (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herken R. (1988) (ed.), The Universal Turing Machine. A Half-Century Survey, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld Lawrence A. and Gelman Susan A., (1994) (eds.), Mapping the Mind. Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter Douglas (1985), Metamagical Themas, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan T. and Tienson J. (1996) (eds.), Connectionnism and the philosophy of psychology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbert Michel (2006), Traité du cerveau, Paris, Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson F. and M. Smith, (eds.) (2005), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob Pierre (1997), What Minds Can Do, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod Marc (1997), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson David and Erneling Christina (eds.) (1997), The Future of the Cognitive Revolution, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird Philip N. (1983), Mental Models, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird Philip N. (1988), The Computer and the Mind. An Introduction to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Slovic P. and Tversky A. (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher Patricia (1990), Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher Philip (1995), The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine J. (1983), “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, pp. 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston Paul (2004), Philosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas J.R. (1961), “Minds, Machines and Gödel”, Philosophy, 36, pp. 112–127; repr. in Alan R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson (ed.), Minds and Machines, Prentice Hall, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig K. (2003), “The Mind-Body Problem: An Overview,” in Warfield & Stich, 2003, pp. 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald Cynthia and Macdonald Graham (1995) (eds.), Connectionism, London, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch Warren S. (1965), Embodiments of Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel A. J. (1983), “Conscious and Unconscious Perception: Experiments on Visual Masking and Word Recognition”, Cognitive Psychology, 15, pp. 197–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan Ruth (1984), Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton P. (1996) (ed.), A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind: Readings with Commentary, Calgary, Alberta, Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel L, (2003) (gen. ed.), Encyclopaedia of Cognitive Science, London, New York & Tokyo, Nature Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T. (1974), “What Is It Like To Be a Bat?”, Philosophical Review, 83(4) pp. 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath Otto (1983), Philosophical Papers, 1913–1946, trans. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath (eds.), Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell Allen and Simon Herbert (1976), “Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search”, Communications of the ACM, 19(3), pp. 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett Richard E. (2003), The Geography of Thought, New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau David (1987), Reality and Representation, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parot Françoise and Richelle Marc (1992) (eds.), Psychologues de langue française, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petisstot J., Varela F.J., Pachoud B. and Roy J.M. (1999) (eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Stanford, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini Massimo (1979) (ed.), Théories du Langage, Théories de l’Apprentissage, le Débat Chomsky/Piaget, Paris, Seuil; Language and Learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, London, Taylor & Francis, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port R.F. and van Gelder T. (1995) (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam Hilary (1960), “Minds and Machines”, reprinted in Putnam, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam Hilary (1975), Mind, Language, and Reality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam Hilary (1988), Representation and Reality, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam Hilary (1994), Entry “Putnam, Hilary” in Guttenplan (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartz Steven R. and Sejnowski Terrence J. (1997), “The Neural Basis of Cognitive Development: A Constructivist Manifesto”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20( 4), pp. 537–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft Ian (1998), “Neuroscience and the mind”, Mind and Language, 13, p. 132–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rips L.J. (1986), “Mental Muddles”, in M. Brand & M. Harnish, eds, The Representation of Knowledge and Belief, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, pp. 258–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal David M. (1991) (ed.), The Nature of Mind, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands Mark (2003), Externalism, Montreal & Kingston, McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart D., McClelland J. and the PDP Research Group (1986), Parallel Distributed Processing. The Microstructure of Cognition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle John R. (1992), The Rediscovery of Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Herbert (1957), “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”, in Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon T. W. (1979), “Philosophical Objections to Programs as Theories”, in M. Ringle (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives in AI, Atlantic City, NJ, Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith David W. and Thomasson Amie L. (2005) (eds.), Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky Paul (1988), “On the proper treatment of connectionism”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, pp. 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky Paul and Legendre Géraldine (2005), The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar, vol. 1: Cognitive Architecture; vol. 2: Linguistic and Philosophical Implications, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder Charles R. and Lopez Shane J. (2002) (eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber Dan (1996), La Contagion des idées, Paris, Odile Jacob; Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach, Oxford, Blackwell, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber Dan (1994), “The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations”, in Hirschfeld and Gelman, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber Dan (2005), “Modularity and Relevance: How can a Massively Modular Mind be flexible and Context-Sensitive?”, in Carruthers, Laurence and Stich, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainton Robert J. (2006) (ed.), Comtemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich Stephen (1996), Deconstructing the Mind, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor Charles (2005), Philosophical Papers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom René (1988), Esquisse d’une sémiophysique, Paris, Interéditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello Michael (2001), The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing Alan M. (1950), “Computing machinery and intelligence”, Mind, LIX(236), pp. 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velmans Max, Schneider Susan (2007) (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield T. S. and Stich S. (2003) (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner Richard and Szubka Tadeusz (1994) (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington E.K. and Weiskrantz L. (1968), “New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients”, Nature, 217, pp. 972–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz L. (1986), Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R. A. and Keil F.C. (1999) (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andler, D. (2009). Philosophy of Cognitive Science. In: Brenner, A., Gayon, J. (eds) French Studies In The Philosophy Of Science. Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, vol 276. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9368-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics