What is a Mental Function?

  • Joëlle Proust
Part of the Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science book series (BSPS, volume 276)

It is a remarkable and puzzling fact that, for over a century, psychological and biological research have been exploring the development and functional characterization of brain/mind activity in almost totally separate and non-interactive ways. It cannot be denied, however, that the human brain is the result of evolution in the brains of other mammals. The subcortical structures of mammals present anatomical, neurochemical and functional homologies, and these suggest largely similar mechanisms for emotion, perception and action. One of the reasons for the lack of concern by experimental psychologists with biological issues may derive from a premature, and thus largely sterile, nature-nurture controversy. While it was difficult in the recent past to understand how genes might interact with the environment in expressing themselves, the notion of epigenetic development is now better understood in its precise mechanisms, although much remains to be discovered.1 The nature-nurture controversy, however, has overshadowed other important points. Even if it is recognized that human behavior largely results from individual and socio-historical interaction with the environment, such interactions can hardly be understood if the general constraints that the species confronts, given its bodily structure, general needs, and physical-social environment, fail to be grasped.


Mental Function Evolutionary Psychology Developmental Module Informational Process Adaptive Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amundson Ron and Lauder George V. (1994), “Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology”, Biology and Philosophy 9 (4), pp. 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsalou Larry W. (1999), “Perceptual Symbol Systems”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4), pp. 577–660.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd Richard and Richerson Peter J. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buller David J. (2005), Adapting Minds. Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Changeux Jean-Pierre (1985), Neuronal Man, The Biology of Mind, New York, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  6. Changeux Jean-Pierre and Dehaene Stanislas (1989), “Neuronal Models of Cognitive Function”, Cognition 33, pp. 63–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen Wayne D. and Tommasi Luca (2006), “Neuroscience in Context: The New Flagship of the Cognitive Sciences”, Biological Theory 1(1), pp. 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen Wayne D. and Hooker Clifford Alan (2000), “An Interactivist-Constructivism Approach to Intelligence; Self-Directed Anticipative Learning”, Philosophical Psychology 13(1), pp. 5–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosmides Lea and Tooby John (1994), “Beyond Intuition and Instinct Blindness; Toward an Evolutionarily Rigorous Cognitive Science”, Cognition 50, pp. 41–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehaene-Lambertz Ghislaine and Dehaene Stanislas (1997), “In Defense of Learning by Selection: Neurobiological and Behavioral Evidence Revisited”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(4), pp. 560–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan John (2001), “An Adaptive Coding Model of Neural Function in Prefrontal Cortex”, Nature Neuroscience Reviews 2, pp. 820–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edelman Gerald M. (1987), Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Etienne Koechlin, Chrystèle Ody and Frédérique Kouneiher (2003), “The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex”, Science 302, pp. 1181–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fodor Jerry (1983), The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hall Brian K. (1992), Evolutionary Developmental Biology, New York, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Jaenisch Rudolf and Bird Adrian (2003), “Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression: How the Genome Integrates Intrinsic and Environmental Signals”, Nature Genetics 33, pp. 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths Paul E. (1996), “Darwinism, Process Structuralism and Natural Kinds, Philosophy of Science 63, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths Paul E. (1997), What Emotions Really Are, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Griffiths Paul E. (in press), “Evo-Devo Meets the Mind; Towards a Developmental Evolutionary Psychology”, in Brandon R. and Sansom Roger (eds.), Integrating Evolution and Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hammerstein Peter, Hager Edward H., Herz Andreas V.M. and Herzel Hanspeter (2006), “Robustness: A Key to Evolutionary Design, Biological Theory 1(1), pp. 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser Mark, Chomsky Noam and Fitch W. Tecumseh (2002), “The Language Faculty: What Is It, Who Has It, and How did It Evolve?” Science 298, pp. 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurford James, Joseph Sam, Kirby Simon and Reid Alastair (1997), “Evolution might Select Constructivism”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(4), pp. 567–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karmiloff-Smith Annette (1992), Beyond Modularity, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Karmiloff-Smith Annette (1998), “Development Itself Is the Key to Understanding Developmental Disorders”, Trends in Cognitive Science 2(10), pp. 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karmiloff-Smith Annette (2006), “Ontogeny, Genetics and Evolution: A Perspective from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience”, Biological Theory 1(1), pp. 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz Lawrence C. and Shatz Carla J. (1996), “Synaptic Activity and the Construction of Cortical Circuits, Science 274:1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maynard-Smith John (1983), Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mayr Ernst (1961–1988), Toward a New Philosophy of Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Millikan Ruth (1984), Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, New Foundations for Realism, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Oyama Susan (1985–2001), The Ontogeny of Information, revised edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Panksepp Jaak and Jules B. (2000), “The Seven Sins of Evolutionary Psychology”, Evolution and Cognition 6(2), pp. 108–131.Google Scholar
  32. Pinker Steven and Ray Jackendoff (2005), “The Faculty of Language: What Is Special about It ? Cognition 97, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Proust Joëlle (1997), Comment l’esprit vient aux bêtes, Essai sur la représentation, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  34. Proust Joëlle (2003), “Can Radical Theories of Simulation Explain Mental Concept Acquisition?” in J. Dokic Jerome and Joelle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 201–228.Google Scholar
  35. Proust Joëlle (2006a), “Agency in Schizophrenics from a Control Theory Viewpoint”, in W. Prinz and N. Sebanz (eds.), Disorders of Volition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, pp. 87–118.Google Scholar
  36. Proust Joëlle (2006b), “Rationality and Metacognition in Non-Human Animals”, in S. Hurley and M. Nudds (eds.), Rational Animals?, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Proust Joëlle (in print), “Metacognition and Metarepresentation: Is a Self-Directed Theory of Mind a Precondition for Metacognition?”, Synthese .Google Scholar
  38. Quartz Steven R. and Sejnowski Terry J. (1997), The Neuronal Basis of Cognitive Development: A Constructivist Manifesto”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, pp. 537–596.Google Scholar
  39. Rizzolatti Guiseppe and Arbib Michael A. (1998), “Language Within our Grasp”, Trends in Neurosciences 21(5), pp. 188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robert J. Scott, Hall Brian.K. and Olson Wendy M. (2001), “Bridging the Gap Between Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Developmental Biology, BioEssays 23, pp. 954–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roy Alice C. and Michael A. Arbib (2005), “The Syntactic Motor System”, in K. Liebal, C. Müller and S. Pika (eds.), Gestural Communication in Nonhuman and Human Primates, Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp. 7–37.Google Scholar
  42. Shockley Kevin, Santana Marie-Vee and Fowler Carol A. (2003), “Mutual Interpersonal Postural Constraints are Involved in Cooperative Conversation”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 29(2), pp. 326–332.Google Scholar
  43. Sperber Dan (2006), “Why a Deep Understanding of Cultural Evolution is Incompatible with Shallow Psychology”, in N. Enfield and S. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality, Oxford, Berg.Google Scholar
  44. Sterelny Kim (2000), “Development, Evolution and Adaptation”, Philosophy of Science 67, pp. 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sterelny Kim and Griffiths Paul E. (1999), Sex and Death, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Thelen Esther and Smith Linda B. (1994), A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vygotsky Lev S. (1978), Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Whiten Andrew (1997), “The Machiavellian Mindreader”, in A. Whiten and R. Byrne, Machiavellian Intelligence II, Extensions and Evaluations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–173.Google Scholar
  49. Wimsatt William. C. (1986), “Developmental Constraints, Generative Entrenchment, and the Innate-Acquired Distinction”, in W. Bechtel (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1986, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joëlle Proust
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Jean Nicod CNRS UMR 8129Paris

Personalised recommendations