Editor's Introduction: Passivity as Necessary Condition for Ethical Agency?

  • Benda Hofmeyr
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 20)

Starting with a radical passivity of the subjectivity, our analysis has come to the notion of “responsibility overflowing freedom” (whereas freedom alone should have been able to justify and limit responsibilities), an obedience prior to the reception of orders. Starting with this anarchical situation of responsibility, our analysis has, no doubt by an abuse of language, named the Good (CCP, 135).

The question concerning the ‘radical passivity’ of the ethical agent undoubtedly constitutes the proverbial 64,000 dollar question in Levinas scholarship and reception. In other words, the question concerning the radically passive ethical agent as opposed to the active autonomous agent, with the freedom to act independently without an inherent imperative or inner directive steering its actions, is the decisive issue separating supporters of Levinas from his critics. Levinas claims that taking responsibility for others in need follows from neither sympathy and compassion nor a free, rational weighing of options. Rather, ethical action is made possible by a primordial, an-archical responsibility that is pre-consciously felt as the ‘Otherwithin- the-Same’. We are passively obligated before we can actively choose to help. Levinas therefore argues that the needy other disturbs and incapacitates our customary egocentric ways, and that this ‘radical passivity’ enables us to recognize our inherent responsibility towards others in need. The present collection of essays seeks to appreciate this central conviction underpinning the entire oeuvre of Levinas and to provide its readers with a sturdy framework for conceptualization, problematization and in-depth analysis. In addition, it offers us a much needed critical revaluation of key issues in Levinas’s thought which are, more often than not, uncritically assimilated or taken as a matter of fact.

Keywords

Burning Europe Posit Stake Hone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernasconi, R. (2002). ‘What Is the Question to Which “Substitution” Is the Answer?’, in Critchley, S. & Bernasconi, R. (Eds.) (2002). The Cambridge Companion to Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalier, C. (2002). ‘Levinas and the Talmud’, in Critchley, S. & Bernasconi, R. (Eds.) (2002). The Cambridge Companion to Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (1978). ‘Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas’, in Writing and Difference, trans. A. Bass. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 79–153.Google Scholar
  4. Eisenstadt, O. (2005). ‘Levinas Versus Levinas: Hebrew, Greek, and Linguistic Justice’, in Philosophy and Rhetoric 38(2): 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levinas, E. (1961). Totalité et infini: essai sur l'extériorité. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Totality and Infinity, trans. A. Lingis. (1979). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff [cited as TI].Google Scholar
  6. Levinas, E. (1974). Autrement qu'être ou au-delà de l'essence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/ Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, trans. A. Lingis. (1991). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Levinas, E. (1984). ‘Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas’, ed. & trans. R. Kearney, in Cohen, R. A. (Ed.) (1986). Face to Face with Levinas. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 13–34 [cited as Dialogue].Google Scholar
  8. Levinas, E. (1987). Collected Philosophical Papers, trans. A. Lingis. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff [cited as CPP].Google Scholar
  9. Levinas, E. (1990a). Nine Talmudic Readings, trans. A. Aronowicz. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press [cited as NTR].Google Scholar
  10. Levinas, E. (1990b). Difficult Freedom, trans. S. Hand. London: Athlone [cited as DF].Google Scholar
  11. Levinas, E. (1996). Basic Philosophical Writings, eds. A. Peperzak, S. Critchley & R. Bernasconi. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press [cited as BPW].Google Scholar
  12. Peperzak, A. (1993). To the Other. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benda Hofmeyr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of PretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations