Environmental problems are becoming increasingly complex. They are no longer limited to reducing a toxic by-product of a specific activity by some well-defined technological fix. Rather, for issues like climate change mitigation or integrated water management, intricate interactions among many natural and social systems have to be taken into account. Scientific uncertainties are significant, and many actors with diverging interests are involved. This has far-reaching implications for the roles of experts and of stakeholders, including ordinary citizens, in environmental policy-making.
On the one hand, the role of science and expert knowledge is changing. Major uncertainties, both in the science and the politics of environmental issues, mean that expert knowledge cannot provide a complete and uncontestable description of the issues. Rather than offering clear and compelling advice to determine policy, such expert knowledge becomes only one part of a broader process of social learning (Beck, 1994: 1–55; see also Lemos & Morehouse, 2005). While expert knowledge is required more than ever to address today's complex environmental problems, it is needed as evidence informing societal debates (Jasanoff, 1991: 29–47), rather than in the mode captured by the familiar aphorism of ‘speaking truth to power’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcamo, J. (Ed.) (1994). IMAGE 2.0: Integrated modelling of global climate change. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alcamo, J., Shaw, R., & Hordijk, L. (1990). The RAINS model of acidification, science and strategies in Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice. Health Education Quarterly, 4, 411–448.
Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.
Byers, P. Y. & Wilcox, J. R. (1991). Focus groups: A qualitative opportunity for researchers. Journal of Business Communication, 1, 63–78.
Cebon, P., Dahinden, U., Davies, H. C., Imboden, D., & Jaeger, C.C. (Eds.) (1998). Views from the Alps. Towards regional assessments of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cox, K. K. & Higginbotham, J. B. (1976). Application of focus group interview in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1, 77–80.
Dahinden, U., Querol, C., Jäger, J., & Nilsson, M. (2002). Citizen interaction with computer models. In B. Kasemir, J. Jäger, C. C. Jaeger, & M. T. Gardner (Eds.), Public participation in sustainability science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deswouges, W. H. & Smith, K. V. (1988). Focus groups and risk communication. The science of listening to data. Risk Analysis, 4, 479–484.
Dürrenberger, G. et al. (1997). Focus groups in integrated assessment. A manual for a participatory tool. ULYSSES Working Paper WP-97–92. Darmstadt, Germany.
European Climate Forum (2004). What is dangerous climate change? Initial Results of a Symposium on Key Vulnerable Regions Climate Change and Article 2 of the UNFCCC Buenos Aires, 14 December 2004. Internet: http://www.european-climate-forum.net
Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger.
IPCC (2007). Summary for policy makers. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaeger, C. C., Schüle, R., & Kasemir, B. (1999). Focus groups in integrated assessment: A micro-cosmos for reflexive modernization. Innovation, 2, 195–219.
Jäger, J. (1998). Current thinking on using scientific findings in environmental policy making. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 143–153.
Jasanoff, S. (1991). Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society. In D. G. Mayo & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kasemir, B., Dahinden, U., Gerger, Å., Schüle, R., Tabara, D., & Jaeger, C. C. (2000). Citizens' perspectives on climate change and energy use. Global Environmental Change, 3, 169–184.
Kasemir, B., Schibli, D., Stoll, S., & Jaeger, C. C. (2000). Involving citizens in climate and energy assessments. Environment, 3, 32–42.
Kasemir, B., Toth, F., & Masing, V. (2000). Climate policy, venture capital, and European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 5, 889–901.
Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C. C., & Jäger, J. (2003). Citizen participation in sustainability assessments. In B. Kasemir, J. Jäger, C. C. Jaeger, & M. T. Gardner (Eds.), Public participation in sustain-ability science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C. C., & Gardner, M. T. (Eds.) (2003). Public participation in sus-tainability science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirby, C. & White, W. R. (Eds.) (1994). Integrated river basin development. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Leskinen, A. (1994). Environmental planning as learning: The principles of negotiation, the disaggregative decision-making method and parallel organization in developing the road administration. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Lemos, M. C. & Morehouse, B. J. (2005). The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 57–68.
Lindblom, C. E. & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
McGlade, J. (1999). SimCoast: An expert system for sustainable coastal zone management. Interdisciplinary scientific methodologies for the sustainable use and management of coastal resource systems. ASEAN — EU Workshop on Major Environmental Inputs, June 20–26, Singapore.
Merton, R. K. & Kendall, P. (1946). The focused interview. American Journal of Sociology, 51, 541–557.
Mostert, E., van Beek, E., Bouman, N. W. M., Hey, E., Savenije, H. H. G., & Thissen, W. A. H. (1999). River basin management and planning. Keynote paper for International Workshop on River Basin Management, October 27–29, The Hague, www.ct.tudelft.nl/rba/Keynote.html
Nelkin, D. (1977). Technological decisions and democracy. European experiments in public participation. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.
Nowotny, H. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Parson, E. (1995). Integrated assessment and environmental policy making. Energy Policy, 4–5, 463–475.
Priscoli, J. D. (1999). What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important? Participatory processes in water management. Satellite Conference to the World Conference on Science, Technical Documents in Hydrology 30. UNESCO, International Hydrological Programme, June 28–30, Budapest.
Querol, C., Swartling, Å. G., Kasemir, B., & Tàbara, D. (2002). Citizens' reports on climate strategies. In B. Kasemir, J. Jäger, C. C. Jaeger, & M. T. Gardner (Eds.), Public participation in sustainability science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raskin, P., Heaps, C., Sieber, J., & Pontius, G. (1996). PoleStar system manual. Boston, MA: Stockholm Environment Institute.
Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Rotmans, J. (1998). Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 155–179.
Rotmans, J. & Asselt, M. B. A. (1996). Integrated assessment: A growing child on its way to maturity. Climatic Change, 3–4, 327–336.
Rotmans, J. & de Vries, B. (1997). Perspectives on global change: The TARGETS approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 1, 3–29.
Schlumpf, C., Behringer, J., Dürrenberger, G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (1998). The personal CO2 calculator — A modelling tool for participatory integrated assessment methods. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 1, 1–12.
Sluijs, van der (1996). Integrated assessment models and the management of uncertainty. IIASA working paper No. WP 96–119, IIASA, Austria.
Sorensen, J. (1997). National and international efforts at integrated coastal management: Definitions, achievements, and lessons. Coastal Management, 1, 3–41.
Sterman, J. D. & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 3–4, 213–238.
Toth, F. L. & Hizsnyik, E. (1998). Integrated environmental assessment: Evolution and applications. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 193–207.
UNEP (1999). Global environmental outlook 2000. UNEP's Millennium Report on the Environment. London.
World Water Commission (2000). A water secure world. Vision for water, life and the environment. World Water Vision Commission Report, Marseille/Montpellier, France.
Welp, M. (1999). Defining integrated coastal management for the Baltic Sea Region. In L. Hedegaard & B. Lindström (Eds.), The NEBI yearbook 1999: North European and Baltic Sea integration. Berlin: Springer.
Welp, M., de la Vega-Leinert, A. C., Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Fürstenau, C. (2006). Science-based stakeholder dialogues in climate change research. In S. Stoll-Kleemann & M. Welp (Eds.), Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management. Theory and practice. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer.
Welp, M., de la Vega-Leinert, A. C., Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Jaeger, C. C. (2006). Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Tools and theories. Global Environmental Change, 2, 170–181.
Weyant, J., Davidson, O., Dowlatabadi, H., Edmonds, J., & Grubb, M. (1996). Integrated assessment of climate change: An overview and comparison of approaches and results. In J. Bruce, H. Lee, & E. Haites (Eds.), Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge: IPCC, Cambridge University Press.
Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment & modernity. Towards a new ecology. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Welp, M., Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C.C. (2009). Citizens' Voices in Environmental Policy. In: Coenen, F.H.J.M. (eds) Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9325-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9325-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9324-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9325-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)