Abstract
The water vole in Britain has undergone a widespread and dramatic decline and the future of this once familiar waterside creature now hangs in the balance. Here we present a method of monitoring water vole activity in a non-linear wetland habitat, using a vegetation-based sampling approach. Water voles show intra-sexual preferences for distinct plant patches, with breeding females commonly associated with twice the number of plant patches than males, particularly soft rush (Juncus effusus). Mean population densities and observed range lengths are also presented. This information adds important fine-scale detail that will enable the construction of more robust population models. These may be used to predict water vole distribution and movement patterns within wetland habitat patches and implemented as a monitoring tool for conservation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bonesi L, Rushton S, Macdonald D (2002) The combined effect of environmental factors and neighbouring populations on the distribution and abundance of Arvicola terrestris. An approach using rule-based models. Oikos 99(2):220–230
Carter SP, Bright PW (2003) Reedbeds as refuges for water voles (Arvicola terrestris) from predation by introduced mink (Mustela vison). Biol Conserv 111(3):371–376
Forman DW, Brain PF (2006) Agonistic behaviour and bite wound patterns in wild water voles (Arvicola terrestris L.). Aggr Behav 32(6):599–603
Giraudoux P, Delattre P, Habert M, Quéré S, Deblay R, Defaut R, Duhamel MF, Moissenet D, Salvi D, Truchetet D (1997) Population dynamics of fossorial water vole (Arvicola terrestris scherman): A land use and landscape perspective. Agric Ecosyst Manage 66:47–60
Jefferies DJ, Morris PA, Mulleneux JE (1989) An inquiry into the changing status of the water vole Arvicola terrestris in Britain. Mammal Rev 19:111–131
Lambin X, Elston DA, Petty SJ, MacKinnon JL (1998) Spatial asynchrony and periodic travelling waves in cyclic populations of field voles. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 265(1405):1491–1496
Lawton JH, Woodroffe GL (1991) Habitat and the distribution of water voles: Why are there gaps in a species range? J Anim Ecol 60:79–91
Macdonald D, Strachan R (1999) The mink and the water vole: Analyses for conservation. Oxford University, Environment Agency and Wildlife Conservation Research Unit
Moorhouse TP, Macdonald DW (2005) Temporal patterns of range use in water voles: Do females’ territories drift? J Mammal 86(4):655–661
Moorhouse TP, Macdonald DW (2008) What limits male range sizes at different population densities? Evidence from three populations of water voles. J Zool 274(4):395–402
Moorhouse TP, Gelling M, Macdonald DW (2009) Effects of habitat quality upon reintroduction success in water voles: Evidence from a replicated experiment. Biol Conserv 142(1):53–60
Morilhat C, Bernard N, Foltete JC, Giraudoux P (2008) Neighbourhood landscape effect on population kinetics of the fossorial water vole (Arvicola terrestris scherman). Landscape Ecol 23(5):569–579
Oksanen T, Schneider M, Rammul Ü, Hambäck P, Aunapuu M (1999) Population fluctuations of voles in North Fennoscandian tundra: Contrasting dynamics in adjacent areas with different habitat composition. Oikos 86:463–478
Rushton SP, Barreto GW, Cormack RM, Macdonald DW, Fuller R (2000) Modelling the effects of mink and habitat fragmentation on the water vole. J Appl Ecol 37:475–490
Strachan R (1998) Water vole conservation handbook. English Nature Environment Agency, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford
Strachan R, Jefferies DJ (1993) The water vole arvicola terrestris in Britain 1989–1990: Its distribution and changing status. Vincent Wildlife Trust, London
Strachan R, Moorhouse T (2006) Water vole conservation handbook, 2nd edn. The Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford University, Oxford
Telfer S, Piertney SB, Dallas JF, Stewart WA, Marshall F, Gow JL, Lambin X (2003) Parentage assignment detects frequent and large-scale dispersal in water voles. Mol Ecol 12(7):1939–1949
Woodroffe GL, Lawton JH, Davidson WL (1990) The impact of feral mink on water voles Arvicola terrestris in the North Yorkshire Moors National Park (England, UK). Biol Conserv 51:4–62
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Clive Hurford for his assistance with vegetation surveys, together with the numerous assistants that helped out with live trapping in the field. We would also like to thank NWCW for allowing us access to the site and their continuous support of this research, and CCW for use of their GIS software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neyland, P., Guest, D., Hipkin, C., Forman, D. (2010). Monitoring Wetland Mammals: An Ecological Case Study. In: Hurford, C., Schneider, M., Cowx, I. (eds) Conservation Monitoring in Freshwater Habitats. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9278-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9278-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9277-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9278-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)