Aquatic Plant Monitoring in the Broads



The Broads is well known as the UK’s largest protected wetland. The Broads Authority, part of the family of National Parks, is the body with responsibility for overall delivery of biodiversity within this wetland area covering some 301 km2. Part of this responsibility is to monitor, research and restore the broads, or shallow lakes, in accordance to European targets set under the Habitats and Water Framework Directives.

A history of monitoring and recording aquatic plants (macrophytes) in The Broads has resulted in well used long-term datasets. These data are proving vital to understanding of the functioning of the complex interconnected series of shallow lakes as well as determining the success of the many restoration projects.

Aquatic plants provide excellent information about the condition of waterbodies and coupled with water quality information lake restoration programmes can be initiated. Gaining the information about aquatic plants can be relatively straightforward with access to a boat and appropriate training in identification skills and safety. However careful consideration is required when selecting a survey method, particularly when setting up long-term surveys. A robust replicable methodology that allows comparison within or between sites that may have different plants biomass, species assemblage or access issues is essential.

Three methods of macrophyte monitoring are described; transect and point surveys from boats and point sampling by SCUBA diving. The development of hydroacoustic survey methodology is also briefly described along with examples of some of the data derived from the different methods and a comparison of these different methods used in The Broads.


The broads lakes macrophyte monitoring replicable methodology transect point surveys SCUBA sampling 


  1. George M (1992) The land use, ecology and conservation of Broadland. Packard Publishing, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeppesen E, Ma S, Mo S, Christoffersen K (1998) The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Kelly A (2008) Lake restoration strategy for the broads. Broads Authority ReportGoogle Scholar
  4. Kennison GCB, Dunsford DS, Schutten J (1998) Stable or changing lakes? A classification of aquatic macrophyte assemblages from a eutrophic shallow lake system in the United Kingdom. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshwater Ecosyst 8:669–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Phillips GL, Kelly A, Pitt J-A, Sanderson R, Taylor ED (2005) The recovery of a very shallow eutrophic lake, 20 years after the control of effluent derived phosphorus. Freshwater Biol 50(10):1628–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pollard P, Huxham M (1998) The European water framework directive: A new era in the management of aquatic ecosystem health? Aquat Conserv Marine Freshwater Ecosyst 8:773–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stewart NF, Church JM (1992) Red data books of Britain and Ireland. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  8. Willby N, Pitt J, Phillips G (2006) Summary of approach used in LEAFPACS for defining ecological quality of rivers and lakes using macrophyte composition. Draft Report to the Lakes Task Team UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Broads Authority 2 Gilders WayNorwichUK
  2. 2.Kepwick Ecological ServicesKepwick CottageNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations