Monitoring Biological Invasions in Freshwater Habitats



Alien species invading freshwater systems are causing major changes in biodiversity worldwide. Some alien species have been used as indicators of water quality and environmental degradation. We discuss the reasons for monitoring invasive species beyond their use as ecological indicators, and offer guidance on the design of appropriate long-term monitoring schemes. Monitoring plays an essential role in providing an early warning system, because eradication of alien species at the early stages of invasion is more effective and less costly than when the invader is established. Monitoring the presence of aliens is also more effective when associated to monitoring the vectors known to transport them, and is equally valuable after eradication and to determine the effects management and whether restoration has been achieved.

Scientifically, monitoring an invasion in conjunction with measuring other abiotic and biotic parameters provides baseline information on the dynamics of the invasion, the vulnerability of the habitat to invasion and on the impacts of the invader. Combining information on the patterns of invasion with that of the regional environmental factors operational at the time is relevant to establishing relationships between the invasion and other global change components. Overall, the long-term monitoring of biological invasions, that integrates information before, during and after an invasion provides valuable information for both managers and scientists.


Invasive species ecological indicators early warning systems long-term monitoring global change 



We thank J. Andreu, A. Montero and R. Díaz-Delgado for comments on an early version of the manuscript. This review was partially supported by the Integrated European Project ALARM (contract 506675, to MV and the Spanish Ministry of Education (Project CGL2006-11652-C02/BOS) to EG.


  1. Alcaraz C, Bisazza A, García-Berthou E (2008) Salinity mediates the competitive interactions between invasive mosquitofish and an endangered fish. Oecologia 155:205–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreu J, Vilà M, Hulme PE (2009) An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain. Environ Manage 43:1244–1255Google Scholar
  3. Bertolino S, Genovesi P (2007) Semiaquatic alien mammals introduced into Italy: Case studies in biological invasion. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chevreuili M, Blanchard M, Teil MJ, Carru AM, Testard P, Chesterikoff A (1996) Evaluation of the pollution by organochlorinated compounds (polychlorobiphenyls and pesticides) and metals (Cd, Cr, Cu and Pb) in the water and in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas) of the river Seine. Water Air Soil Pollut 88:371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2006) Homogenization dynamics and introduction routes of invasive freshwater fish in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecol Appl 16:2313–2324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2008) The invasive non-native species framework strategy for Great Britain. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, p 42Google Scholar
  7. Díaz-Delgado R, Bustamante J, Aragonés D (2008) La teledetección como herramienta en la cartografía de especies invasoras: Azolla filiculoides en Doñana. In: Vilà M, Valladares F, Traveset A, Santamaría L, Castro P (eds) Invasiones Biológicas. Colección Divulgación CSIC, Madrid, pp 159–163 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  8. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Hutchison MA, Ewers RM, Gemmell NJ (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol 20:470–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gherardi F (2007) Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution and threats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 507–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gherardi F, Gollasch S, Minchin D, Olenin S, Panov VE (2009) Alien invertebrates and fish in European inland waters. In: DAISIE (eds) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 93–104Google Scholar
  11. Hobbs RJ, Humphries SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 9:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK (1997) The effects of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) invasion on aquatic communities in eastern Europe. J Shellfish Res 16:187–203Google Scholar
  13. Kennard MJ, Arthington AH, Pusey BJ, Harch BD (2005) Are alien fish a reliable indicator of river health? Freshwater Biol 50:174–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C et al (2008) Alien flora of Europe: Species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101–148Google Scholar
  15. Lee H II, Reusser D, Olden JD et al (2008) Integrated monitoring and information systems for managing aquatic invasive species in a changing climate. Conserv Biol 22:575–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lougheed VL, Crosbie B, Chow-Fraser P (1998) Predictions on the effect of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exclusion on water quality, zooplankton, and submergent macrophytes in a Great Lakes wetland. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1189–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mulvey M, Newman MC, Chazal A, Keklak MM, Heagler MG, Hales LJ (1995) Genetic and demographic responses of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki Girard 1859) populations stressed by mercury. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1411–1418Google Scholar
  18. Muñoz-Fuentes V, Vilà C, Green AJ, Negro JJ, Sorensen MD (2007) Hybridization between white-headed ducks and introduced ruddy ducks in Spain. Mol Ecol 16:629–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pont D, Hugueny B, Beier U, Goffaux D, Melcher A, Noble R, Rogers C, Roset N, Schmutz S (2006) Assessing river biotic condition at a continental scale: A European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages. J Appl Ecol 43:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahel F, Olden JD (2008) Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:521–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Solé M, Raldua D, Piferrer F, Barceló D, Porte C (2003) Feminization of wild carp, Cyprinus carpio, in a polluted environment: plasma steroid hormones, gonadal morphology and xenobiotic metabolizing system. Compar Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol 136:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Roques A, Roy D, Hulme P, DAISIE partners. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecol Environ (in press) DOI: 10.1890/080083Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC)Isla de la CartujaSpain
  2. 2.Institut d’Ecologia AquàticaUniversitat de GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations