Faithful Brokers? Potentials and Pitfalls of Religion in Peacemaking

  • Kristian Berg Harpviken
  • Hanne Eggen Røislien
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Religion and Education book series (IHRE, volume 4)

Abstract

Recent years have seen increasing interest in the potential of religion for peacemaking. This chapter conceptualizes the role of religious actors in peacemaking, starting from a distinction among three facets of religion: its normative aspect, its relationship to identity, and its organizational function. Each may feed into the emergence or escalation of conflict, and each is in itself transformed through exposure to armed conflict. Similarly, each fact forms part of the peacemaking potential of religious actors in various ways. Focusing on the identity aspect of religion, along with the extent to which a given identity is shared by both the broker and conflictual parties, we suggest may be of three distinct types: the liaison, the coordinator, and the representative.

Keywords

Arena Schiff Stake Colombia Ethos 

References

  1. Agha, H., Feldman, S., Khalidi, A., and Schiff, Z. (2003). Track-II Diplomacy: Lessons from the Middle East. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Appleby, R.S. (1996). Religion as an agent of conflict transformation and peacebuilding. In C.A. Crocker, F.O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), The challenges of Managing International Conflict. Washington, DC.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appleby, R.S. (2002). Exploiting the ambivalence of religion: Transforming conflict by transforming religion. In B. Mollov (Ed.), Religion and conflict resolution Proceedings. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Boulding, E. (1986). Two cultures of religion as obstacles to peace. Zygon, 21, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cain, A. (2001). Humanitarian and development actors as peacebuilders?. Review of African Political Economy, 28, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, J., & Smith, G.S. (2004).Religious peacebuilding: From potential to action. In H. Coward & G.S. Smith (Eds.), Religion and peacebuilding. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chigas, D. (2005). Negotiating Intractable conflicts: The contributors of unofficial intermediaries. In C.A. Crocker, F.O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Grasping he Nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duduet, V. (2006).Transitions from violence to peace: Revisiting analysis and intervention in conflict transformation. Berlin: Berghof Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  10. Gopin, M. (2000). Between Eden and Armageddon: The future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gould, R.V., & Fernandez, R.M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haar, G., & Busuttil, J.J. (Eds.) (2003). The freedom to do god’s will: Religious fundamentalism and social change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Hadjipavlou, M. (2007). The Cyprus conflict: Root causes and implications for peace-building. Journal of Peace Research, 444(3), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, M.B. (1995). The sociology of religion: Theoretical and comparative perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Harpviken, K.B. (1997). Transcending traditionalism: The emergence of non-state military formations in Afghanistan. Journal of Peace Research, 34(3), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harpviken, K.B., & Kjellman, K.E. (2004).Beyond blueprints: Civil society and peacebuilding. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Haynes, J. (1998). Religion in global politics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  18. Johansen, R.C. (1997). Radical Islam and nonviolence: A case study of religious empowerment and constraint among Pashtuns. Journal of Peace Research, , 34(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston, D. (Ed.) (2003). Faith-based diplomacy: Trumping realpolitik. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnston, D., & Cox, B. (2003). Faith-based diplomacy and preventive engagement.In D. Johnston (Ed.), Faith-based diplomacy: Trumping realpolitik. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, D.M., & Eastvold, J. (2004). History unrequited: Religion as provocateur and peacemaker in the Bosnian conflict. In H. Coward & G.S. Smith (Eds.), Religion and peacebuilding. Albany: State University Press of New York.Google Scholar
  22. Lederach, J.P. (2000) Mennonite central committee efforts in Somalia and Somaliland. In J.P. Lederach & C. Sampson (Eds.), From the ground up: mennonite contributions to international peacebuilding. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lincoln, B. (2006). Holy terrors: Thinking about religion after September 11 (2nd Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGuire, M. (2002). Religion: The social context. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  25. McMaster, J. (2002). Living towards the vision: A theological praxis of conflict resolution. In B. Mollov (Ed.), Religion and Conflict Resolution Proceedings. Ramat-Gan, Israel: Bar-Ilan University, Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. McTernan, O. (2003). Violence in god’s name: Religion in an age of conflict. New York: Orbis.Google Scholar
  27. Repstad, P. (2004). The power of the faithful: Powerful actors with clear intentions or power everywhere? In S.J. Stålsett & O. Leirvik (Eds.), The power of faiths in Global Politics. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
  28. Starkey, B., Boyer, M.A., & Wilkenfeld, J. (2005). Negotiating a complex world: An introduction to international negotiation. Oxford: New Millennium Books in International Studies.Google Scholar
  29. Stedman, S.J. (1997). Spoiler problems in peace processes. International security, 22, 5–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristian Berg Harpviken
    • 1
  • Hanne Eggen Røislien
    • 2
  1. 1.International Peace Research InstituteOsloNorway
  2. 2.International Peace Research Institute OsloOslo UniversityOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations