Advertisement

A Comparison Between The Provisions Of Present And Past Romanian Seismic Design Codes Based On Required Structural Overstrength

  • I. Craifaleanu
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Due to several factors, the lateral resistance of a structure is usually greater than the lateral force used in seismic design. As a result, a structure has an overstrength that can be mobilized in variable amounts when the structure is subjected to lateral seismic loads. The available structural overstrength is difficult to evaluate analytically; a more promising quantity for research is required overstrength, i.e. the overstrength necessary to a structure in order to withstand specified seismic forces. Based on required overstrength, the severity of provisions concerning seismic force evaluation was assessed comparatively for the two versions of the Romanian seismic design code.

Keywords

Overstrength seismic design code response spectra design spectra 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Craifaleanu, I. G. (2002) Aspects concerning the adoption of the Eurocode 8 behavior factors in Romanian seismicity conditions, Bulletin of the Romanian Association of Structural Design Engineers (AICPS), No. 3/2002, pp. 43–48 (in Romanian)Google Scholar
  2. Craifaleanu, I. G. (2005) Nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom models in earthquake engineering, Matrix Rom Publishing House, Bucharest (in Romanian)Google Scholar
  3. Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1, Dec.Google Scholar
  4. Lungu, D., Cornea, T., Craifaleanu, I., Demetriu, S. (1996) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for inelastic structures on soft soils, Proceedings of the Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, June 23–28, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  5. Lungu, D., Arion, C., Aldea, A., Vacareanu R. (2004). Representation of seismic action in the new Romanian code for design of earthquake resistant buildings P100-2003, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 15p., CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  6. P100 (1992) Code for the aseismic design of residential, agricultural and industrial structures —P100-92 (in Romanian), Buletinul Constructiilor, INCERCGoogle Scholar
  7. P100 (2006) Seismic design code — P100. Part I — P100-1/2006: Design rules for buildings. Ministry of Transport, Constructions and Tourism (in Romanian)Google Scholar
  8. Uang, C.-M. (1991) Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 1, Jan., pp. 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Craifaleanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of Civil Engineering BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations