Seismic Monitoring: A Contribution To The Sustainable Development Of The Russe Region Of Bulgaria

  • M. Kouteva
  • I. Paskaleva
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Recently published data on seismic hazards due to strong, intermediate-depth Vrancea earthquakes in the area around the city of Russe is summarized including a review of analyses of available data, both macroseismic and instrument, and of recent theoretical seismic hazard estimates. A snapshot of the development of a strong motion registration system is offered, and the benefits of seismic monitoring in the region are discussed. Transforming data produced by seismic monitoring instruments into information for decision makers (e.g. emergency managers, earthquake engineers) are summarized including analytical steps that differ depending on the type of data and the nature of the decision.


Dynamic monitoring seismic hazard strong intermediate-depth earthquakes Vrancea strong motion registration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldea A., Okawa I., Koyama S., Poiata N. (2006a) Dense Urban Instrumentation for Site Effects Assessment in Bucharest, Romania, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (13th ECEE &30th General Assembly of the ESC), Geneva, Switzerland, 3&2013;8 Sept. 2006, Paper Number: 518Google Scholar
  2. Aldea A., Kashima T., Poiata N., Kajiwara T. (2006b) A New Digital Seismic Network in Romania with Dense Instrumentation in Bucharest, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (13th ECEE & 30th General Assembly of the ESC), Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 Sept. 2006, Paper Number: 515Google Scholar
  3. Glavcheva R. (1983) Parameters of the Macroseismic Field and of the Attenuation of the Intensity with the Distance. In: The Vrancea 1977 Earthquake. Consequences in the Republic of Bulgaria (Brankov G., Bonchev E., Ignatiev N., Boncheva H., Christoskov L., Paskaleva I., Eds.), BAS, Sofia, pp. 151–153 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  4. Klügel J.U. (2007a) Error Inflation in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Engineering Geology, 90(2007), 186–192, available online at www.sciencedirect.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Klügel J.U. (2007b) Comment on “Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates” by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson, BSSA, 97(6), comment, doi: 10.1785/0120070018Google Scholar
  6. Klügel J.U., Mualchin L., Panza G.F. (2006) A Scenario-Based Procedure for Seismic Risk Analysis, Engineering Geology, 88(2006), 1–22, available online at www. sciencedirect.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kouteva M. (2002) Estimates of Ground Motion and Hazard Assessment Through Earthquake Scenarios, Marie Curie Fellowship final report, Project EVK2-CT-2000–5700, DST, Univ. of TriesteGoogle Scholar
  8. Kouteva M., Panza G.F., Paskaleva I. (2000) An Example for Ground Motions in Connection with Vrancea Earthquakes (Case Study in EN Bulgaria, Russe site), 12 WCEE 2000, Auckland, New Zealand, 30 Jan.—4 Feb., Ref.2185, on CDGoogle Scholar
  9. Kouteva M., Panza G.F., Romanelli F., Paskaleva I. (2004a) Modelling of the Ground Motion at Russe Site (NE Bulgaria) Due To the Vrancea Earthquakes, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 209–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kouteva M., Panza G.F., Paskaleva I., Romanelli F. (2004b) Deterministic Earthquake Scenarios Associated with the Intermediate-Depth Vrancea Earthquakes: Case Study of Russe, NE Bulgaria, 13 WCEE, Vancouver, Canada, Aug. 1–6, 2004Google Scholar
  11. Kouteva M., Panza G.F., Paskaleva I., Romanelli F. (2004c) A View to the Intermediate-Depth Vrancea Earthquake of May 30, 1990: Case Study in NE Bulgaria, Journal of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 39(2–3), 223–231, April–MayGoogle Scholar
  12. Molchan G., Kronrod T., Panza G.F. (1997) Multi-scale Seismicity Model for Seismic Risk, BSSA, 87(5), 1220–1229Google Scholar
  13. Panza G.F., Vaccari F. (2000) Introduction in Seismic Hazard of the Circum-Pannonian Region (Panza G.F., Radulian M., Trifu C., Eds.), Pageoph Topical Volumes, Birkhauser Verlag, pp. 5–10Google Scholar
  14. Panza G.F., Romanelli F., Vaccari F. (2001) Seismic Wave Propagation in Laterally Heterogeneous Anelastic Media: Theory and Applications to the Seismic Zonation, Advances in Geophysics, 43, 1–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paskaleva I. (2004) Assessment of the Design Parameters for North-East Bulgaria Based on the Recorded Accelerograms During 1986 and 1990 Vrancea Earthquakes, ESC General Assembly Papers, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Paskaleva I., Kouteva M. (2000) An Approach of Microzonation of the Town of Russe in Connection of Recent Vrancea Earthquakes and Shabla Zone, Report under bilateral cooperation with UNIVTS-DST, Trieste, Italy, pp. 200Google Scholar
  17. Paskaleva I., Kouteva M. (2007) Intermediate Progress Report, NATO SfP Project 980468, CLSMEE — Bulgarian Acad. SciGoogle Scholar
  18. Paskaleva I., Kouteva M., Panza G.F., Evlogiev J., Koleva N., Ranguelov N. (2001) Deterministic Approach of Seismic Hazard Assessment in Bulgaria: Case Study in NE Bulgariia — the Town of Russe, AJNTS, 2001 (1), Albanian Academy of Sciences, Maluka, Tirana, pp. 51—73Google Scholar
  19. Romplus Earthquake Catalogue:
  20. Shebalin N., Leydecker G., Mokrushina N., Tatevossian R., Erteleva O., Vassiliev V. (1999) Earthquake Catalogue for Central and Southeastern Europe 342 BC — 1990 AD, European Commission, Report No. ETNU CT 93-0087Google Scholar
  21. Simeonova S., Solakov D., Leydecker G., Busche H., Schmitt T., Kaiser D. (2006a) Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map for Bulgaria as a Basis for a New Building Code, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6, 881–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simeonova S., Alexandrova I., Solakov D., Popova I. (2006b) Macroseismic Observations Due To the Intermediate-Focus Vrancea Earthquakes (1940 and 1977), Romania, on the Territory of the Town of Russe, Nat. Conf. “Geosciences” 2006, Book of Abstracts, ISBN-10:954-91606-4–5, pp. 323–325 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  23. Solakov D., Nikolova S., Miloshev N., Simeonova S., Dimitrova L. (2007) Bulgarian Seismological Network — Current Status, Orfeus Newsletter, 7(1),
  24. Todorovska M., Paskaleva I., Glavcheva R. (1994) Earthquake Source Parameters for Seismic Hazard Assessment Examples in Bulgaria, Proc. Xth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Sept. 1994, Vol. 4, pp. 2573–2578Google Scholar
  25. Zaicenco A., Alkaz V. (2005) Design of the Strong-Motion Database for Vrancea Earthquakes, Science and Technology for Safe Development of Lifeline Systems, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Oct. 24–25, 2005Google Scholar


  1. Code for Design of Structures in Seismic Regions, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1987Google Scholar
  2. EUROCODE 8 Basis of Design and Actions on Structures, CEN 1994Google Scholar
  3. Improved Seismic Monitoring — Improved Decision-Making: Assessing the Value of Reduced Uncertainty, Committee on the Economic Benefits of Improved Seismic Monitoring, Committee on Seismology and Geodynamics, National Research Council, ISBN: 0-309-55178-1, 196 pp.,2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Kouteva
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Paskaleva
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Laboratory for Seismic Mechanics and Earthquake EngineeringBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.ESP-SAND ICTPTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations