Biochemical Model of C3 Photosynthesis

  • Susanne von Caemmerer
  • Graham Farquhar
  • Joseph Berry
Part of the Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration book series (AIPH, volume 29)

A brief overview of the C3 photosynthesis model described by Graham Farquhar, Susanne von Caem-merer and Joseph Berry is provided. The model was designed to help interpret gas exchange measurements of CO2 assimilation of leaves and to represent C3 photosynthesis in other systems such as stomatal control and the CO2 concentrating function of C4 photosynthesis. It can predict steady state CO2 assimilation rates under different environmental conditions of light intensity, temperature, CO2 and O2 concentrations. The model is based on Rubisco's kinetic properties and the rate of CO2 assimilation is given as the minimum of either a Rubisco limited rate, where the substrate ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP) is saturating, or a chloroplast electron transport (or RuBP regeneration) limited rate. The model can be used to estimate in vivo Rubisco activity and chloroplast electron transport capacity. This however requires information on the partial pressure of CO2 in the chloroplast which has been shown to be less than that in the intercellular airspaces. The temperature dependence of Rubisco kinetic constants is based on both in vitro and in vivo measurements of these parameters. The temperature dependence of the maximum chloroplast electron transport has also been parameterized from both in vivo and in vitro measurements; however the fact that thermal acclimation changes thylakoid properties and the temperature dependence of chloroplast electron transport prevents a unique parameterization. Further studies are required to investigate whether CO2 assimilation rate at temperature extremes is limited by Rubisco and its activation state or by electron transport capacity in order to improve the model's accuracy under these conditions.


Assimilation Rate Electron Transport Rate Plant Cell Environ Versus Cmax Biochemical Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainsworth EA, Davey PA, Hymus GJ, Drake BG and Long SP (2002) Long-term response of photosynthesis to elevated carbon dioxide in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. Ecol Appl 12: 1267–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews TJ and Lorimer GH (1987) Rubisco: structure, mechanisms, and prospects for improvement. In: Hatch MD and Boardman NK (eds) The Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise, Vol 10, Photosynthesis, pp 131–218. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews TJ, Von Caemmerer S, Mate CJ, Hudson GS and Evans JR (1995) The regulation of Rubisco catalysis by Rubisco activase. In: Mathis P (ed) Photosynthesis: from Light to Biosphere, pp 17–22. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Armond PA, Schreiber U and Björkman O (1978) Photosyn-thetic acclimation to temperature in the desert shrub Lar-rea divaricata II. Light-harvesting efficiency and electron transport. Plant Physiol 61: 411–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkin OK, Evans JR and Siebke K (1998) Relationship between the inhibition of leaf respiration by light and enhancement of leaf dark respiration following light treatment. Aust J Plant Physiol 25: 437–443Google Scholar
  6. Badger MR and Andrews TJ (1974) Effects of CO2, O2 and temperature on a high-affinity form of ribulose diphos-phate carboxylase-oxygenase from spinach. Biochem Bio-phys Res Commun 60: 204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badger MR and Collatz GJ (1977) Studies on the kinetic mechanism of RuBP carboxylase and oxygenase reactions, with particular reference to the effect of temperature on kinetic parameters. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 76: 355–361Google Scholar
  8. Badger MR, Von Caemmerer S, Ruuska S and Nakano H (2000) Electron flow to oxygen in higher plants and algae: rates and control of direct photoreduction (Mehler reaction) and rubisco oxygenase. Phil Trans R Soc Lond — Ser B: Biol Sci 355: 1433–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldocchi D (1994) An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models. Tree Physiol 14: 1069–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldocchi DD, Wilson KB and Gu LH (2002) How the environment, canopy structure and canopy physiological functioning influence carbon, water and energy fluxes of a temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest-an assessment with the biophysical model CANOAK. Tree Physiol 22: 1065–1077PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ball JT (1988) An analysis of stomatal conductance. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford University, Standord, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Ball TJ, Woodrow IE and Berry JA (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggins J (ed) Progress in Photosynthesis Research, pp 221–224. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Baroli I, Price GD, Badger MR and Von Caemmerer S (2008) The contribution of photosynthesis to the red light response of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol 146: 737–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR and Long SP (2001) Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 24: 253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernacchi CJ, Portis AR, Nakano H, Von Caemmerer S and Long SP (2002) Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol 130: 1992–1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernacchi CJ, Pimentel C and Long SP (2003) In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1419–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berry JA and Björkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher-plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 31: 491–543Google Scholar
  18. Berry JA and Farquhar GD (1978) The CO2 concentrating function of C4 photosynthesis: a biochemical model. In: Hall D, Coombs J and Goodwin T (eds) The Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Photosynthesis, pp 119–131. Biochemical Society of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Björkman O (1968) Carboxydismutase activity in shade and sun adapted species of higher plants. Physiol Plantarum 21: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Björkman O and Pearcy RW (1971) The effect of growth temperature on the temperature dependence of photosynthesis in vivo and on CO2 fixation by carboxydismutase in vitro in C3 and C4 species. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 70: 520–526Google Scholar
  21. Björkman O, Pearcy RW, Harrison AT and Mooney HA (1972) Photosynthetic adaptation to high temperatures: a field study in Death Valley, California. Science 175: 786–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Björkman O, Badger MR and Armond PA (1980) Response and adaptation of photosynthesis to high temperatures. In: Turner NC and Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress, pp 233–249. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Bowes G (1991) Growth at elevated CO2: photosynthetic responses mediated through Rubisco. Plant Cell Environ 14: 795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bowes G and Ogren WL (1972) Oxygen inhibition and other properties of soybean RuDP carboxylase. J Biol Chem 247: 2171–2176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bowes G, Ogren WL and Hageman RH (1971) Phos-phoglycolate production catalyzed by ribulose diphos-phate carboxylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 45: 716–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brooks A and Farquhar GD (1985) Effect of temperature on the CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light–estimates from gas-exchange measurements on spinach. Planta 165: 397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Butz ND and Sharkey TD (1989) Activity ratios of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase accurately reflect carbamy-lation ratios. Plant Physiol 89: 735–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bykova NV, Keerberg O, Pärnik T, Bauwe H and Gardeström P (2005) Interaction between photorespira-tion and respiration in transgenic potato plants with anti-sense reduction in glycine decarboxylase. Planta 222: 130–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cen YP and Sage RF (2005) The regulation of rubisco activity in response to variation in temperature and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure in sweet potato. Plant Physiol 139: 979–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Colello GD, Grivet C, Sellers PJ and Berry JA (1998) Modeling of energy, water, and CO2 flux in a temperate grassland ecosystem with SiB2: May–October 1987. J Atmos Sci 55: 1141–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Collatz GJ (1978) The interaction between photosynthesis and ribulose-P2 concentration — effects of light, CO2, and O2. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 77: 248–251Google Scholar
  32. Collatz GJ, Berry JA, Farquhar GD and Pierce J (1990) The relationship between the Rubisco reaction mechanism and models of photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 13: 219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C and Berry JA (1991) Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration — a model that includes a laminar boundary-layer. Agric Forest Meteorol 54: 107–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Collatz GJ, Ribas-Carbo M and Berry JA (1992) Coupled photosynthesis-stomatal model for leaves of C4 plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 19: 519–538Google Scholar
  35. Cowan IR and Farquahr GD (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp Soc Exp Biol 31: 317–345Google Scholar
  36. Crafts-Brandner SJ and Salvucci ME (2000) Rubisco acti-vase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13430–13435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. de Pury DG and Farquhar GD (1997) Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Environ 20: 537–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. de Pury DG and Farquhar GD (1999) A commentary on the use of a sun/shade model to scale from the leaf to a canopy. Agric Forest Meteorol 95: 257–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ehleringer J and Björkman O (1977) Quantum yields for CO2 uptake in C3 and C4 plants. Dependence on temperature, CO2 and O2 concentration. Plant Physiol 59: 86–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ellsworth DS, Reich PB, Naumburg ES, Koch GW, Kubiske ME and Smith SD (2004) Photosynthesis, carboxylation and leaf nitrogen responses of 16 species to elevated pCO2 across four free-air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Global Change Biol 10: 2121–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ethier GJ and Livingston NJ (2004) On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar-Von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ 27: 137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ethier GJ, Livingston NJ, Harrison DL, Black TA and Moran JA (2006) Low stomatal and internal conductance to CO2 versus Rubisco deactivation as determinants of the pho-tosynthetic decline of ageing evergreen leaves. Plant Cell Environ 29: 2168–2184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Evans JR (1986) The relationship between carbon-dioxide-limited photosynthetic rate and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate-carboxylase content in two nuclear-cytoplasm substitution lines of wheat, and the coordination of ribulose-bisphosphate-carboxylation and electron-transport capacities. Planta 167: 351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans JR (1987) The dependence of quantum yield on wavelength and growth irradiance. Aust J Plant Physiol 14: 69–79Google Scholar
  45. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78: 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Evans JR and Von Caemmerer S (1996) Carbon dioxide diffusion inside leaves. Plant Physiol 110: 339–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Evans JR, Sharkey TD, Berry JA and Farquhar GD (1986) Carbon isotope discrimination measured concurrently with gas-exchange to investigate CO2 diffusion in leaves of higher plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 281–292Google Scholar
  48. Farquhar GD (1979) Models describing the kinetics of RuBP carboxylase-oxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys 193: 456–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Farquhar GD and Von Caemmerer S (1982) Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB and Ziegler H (eds) Physiological Plant Ecology II. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 12 B, pp 550–587. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  50. Farquhar GD and Wong CS (1984) An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 191–210Google Scholar
  51. Farquhar GD, Von Caemmerer S and Berry JA (1980) A biochemical-model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149: 78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Feller U, Craftsbrandner SJ and Salvucci ME (1998) Moderately high temperatures inhibit ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activase-mediated activation of Rubisco. Plant Physiol 116: 539–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Feng L, Wang K, Li Y, Tan Y, Kong J, Li H and Zhu Y (2007) Overexpression of SBPase enhances photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Rep 26: 1635–1646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo M, Hanson DT, Bota J, Otto B, Cifre J, McDowell N, Medrano H and Kaldenhoff R (2006) Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO2 in vivo. Plant J 48: 427–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Flexas J, Diaz-Espejo A, Galmes J, Kaldenhoff R, Medrano H and Ribas-Carbo M (2007a) Rapid variations of mes-ophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2 concentration around leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30: 1284–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Galmes J and Medrano H (2007b) Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant Cell Environ 31: 602–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Galmes J, Flexas J, Keys AJ, Cifre J, Mitchell RAC, Madg-wick PJ, Haslam RP, Medrano H and Parry MAJ (2005) Rubisco specificity factor tends to be larger in plant species from drier habitats and in species with persistent leaves. Plant Cell Environ 28: 571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Genty B, Briantais J-M and Baker N (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87–92Google Scholar
  59. Haldimann P and Feller U (2004) Inhibition of photosynthesis by high temperature in oak (Quercus pubescens L.) leaves grown under natural conditions closely correlates with a reversible heat-dependent reduction of the activation state of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxy-lase/oxygenase. Plant Cell Environ 27: 1169–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Haldimann P and Feller U (2005) Growth at moderately elevated temperature alters the physiological response of the photosynthetic apparatus to heat stress in pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaves. Plant Cell Environ 28: 302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hall AE (1979) A model of leaf photosynthesis and respiration for predicting carbon dioxide assimilation in different environments. Oecologia 143: 299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hall AE and Björkman O (1975) A model of leaf photosynthesis and respiration. In: Gates DM and Schmerl R (eds) Perspectives of biophysical ecology, pp 55–72. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  63. Hanba YT, Shibasaka M, Hayashi Y, Hayakawa T, Kasamo K, Terashima I and Katsuhara M (2004) Overexpression of the barley aquaporin HvPIP2;1 increases internal CO2 conductance and CO2 assimillation in the leaves of trans-genic rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol 45: 521–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hanson KR and Peterson RB (1986) Regulation of photores-piration in leaves: evidence that the fraction of ribulose bisphosphate oxygenated is conserved and stoichiometry fluctuates. Arch Biochem Biophys 246: 332–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Harley PC and Sharkey TD (1991) An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynth Res 27: 169–178Google Scholar
  66. Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF and Strain BR (1992) Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 15: 271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hoefnagel MHN, Atkin OK and Wiskich JT (1998) Interdependence between chloroplasts and mitochondria in the light and the dark. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1366: 235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hudson GS, Evans JR, Von Caemmerer S, Arvidsson YBC and Andrews TJ (1992) Reduction of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase content by antisense RNA reduces photosynthesis in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 98: 294–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variation in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 273: 593–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jordan DB and Chollet R (1983) Inhibition of ribu-lose bisphosphate carboxylase by substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate. J Biol Chem 258: 13752–13758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. June T, Evans JR and Farquhar GD (2004) A simple new equation for the reversible temperature dependence of photosynthetic electron transport: a study on soybean leaf. Funct Plant Biol 31: 275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kebeish R, Niessen M, Thiruveedhi, K, Bari, R, Hirsch HJ, Rosenkranz R, Stabler N, Schonfeld B, Kreuzaler F and Peterhansel C (2007) Chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthesis and biomass production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 25: 593–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kirschbaum MUF and Farquhar GD (1984) Temperature dependence of whole-leaf photosynthesis in Eucalyptus pauciflora. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 519–538Google Scholar
  74. Ku SB and Edwards GE (1977) Oxygen inhibition of photosynthesis II. Kinetic characteristics affected by temperature. Plant Physiol 59: 991–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kubien DS, Whitney SM, Moore PV and Jesson LK (2008) The biochemistry of Rubisco in Flaveria. J Exp Bot 59: 1767–1777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Laing WA, Ogren WL and Hageman RH (1974) Regulation of soybean net photosynthetic CO2 fixation by the interaction of CO2, O2, and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxy-lase. Plant Physiol 54: 678–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Laisk A (1970) A model of leaf photosynthesis and pho-torespiration. In: Setlik I (ed) Prediction and Measurement of Photosynthetic Productivity, pp 295–306. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (PUDOC), WageningenGoogle Scholar
  78. Laisk A (1977) Kinetics of Photosynthesis and Photorespira-tion in C3 Plants. Nauka Publishing, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  79. Laisk A and Oja V (1974) Leaf photosynthesis under short pulses of CO2: the carboxylation rection in vivo. Fiziologija Rastenij (Soviet Plant Physiology) 21: 1123–1131 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  80. Laisk A and Oja V (1998) Dynamics of Leaf Photosynthesis: Rapid-Response Measurements and Their Interpretation. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  81. Laisk A, Eichelmann H and Oja V (2006) C3 photosynthesis in silico. Photosynth Res 90: 45–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lefebvre S, Lawson T, Zakhleniuk OV, Lloyd JC and Raines CA (2005) Increased sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase activity in transgenic tobacco plants stimulates photosynthesis and growth from an early stage in development. Plant Physiol 138: 451–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Leuning R (1990) Modelling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis. Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 159–175Google Scholar
  84. Leuning R (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 18: 339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Leuning R (2002) Temperature dependence of two parameters in a photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ 25: 1205–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lilley RM and Walker DA (1975) Carbon dioxide assimilation by leaves, isolated chloroplasts, and RuDP carboxy-lase from spinach. Plant Physiol 55: 1087–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lloyd J and Farquhar GD (1994) C13 Discrimination during CO2 assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere. Oecologia 99: 201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lloyd J and Farquhar GD (2008) Effects of rising temperatures and [CO2] on the physiology of tropical forest trees. Phil Trans R Soc Lond — Ser B: Biol Sci 363: 1811–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Long SP (1991) Modification of the response of photosyn-thetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: Has its importance been underestimated? Plant Cell Environ 14: 729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Long SP and Bernacchi CJ (2003) Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J Exp Bot 54: 2393–2401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Lorimer GH, Badger MR and Andrews TJ (1976) The activation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase by carbon dioxide and magnesium ions. Equilibria, kinetics, a suggested mechanism and physiological implications. Biochemistry 15: 529–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Matsuoka M, Furbank RT, Fukayama H and Miyao M (2001) Molecular engineering of C4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52: 297–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. McMurtrie RE and Wang YP (1993) Mathematical models of the photosynthetic response of tree stands to rising CO2 concentrations and temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 16: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Medlyn BE, Dreyer E, Ellsworth, D, Forstreuter, M, Harley PC, Kirschbaum MUF, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Strasse-meyer J, Walcroft A, Wang, K and Loustau D (2002) Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ 25: 1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mitchell PL and Sheehy JE (2006) Supercharging rice photosynthesis to increase yield. New Phytol 171: 688–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Miyagawa Y, Tamoi M and Shigeoka S (2001) Overexpres-sion of a cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase in tobacco enhances photosynthesis and growth. Nat Biotechnol 19: 965–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Mueller-Cajar O, Morell M and Whitney SM (2007) Directed evolution of Rubisco in Escherichia coli reveals a specificity-determining hydrogen bond in the form II enzyme. Biochemistry 46: 14067–14074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ögren E and Evans JR (1993) Photosynthethic light response curves. I. The influence of CO2 partial pressure and leaf inversion. Planta 189: 182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pearcy RW, Gross LJ and He D (1997) An improved dynamic model of photosynthesis for estimation of carbon gain in sunfleck light regimes. Plant Cell Environ 20: 411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Peisker M (1974) A model describing the influence of oxygen on photosynthetic carboxylation. Photosynthetica 8: 47–50Google Scholar
  101. Peisker M (1976) Ein Modell der Sauerstoffabhangigkeit des Photosynthetischen CO2-Gaswechsels von C3 Pflanzen. Kulturpflanze XXIV: 221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Portis AR (2003) Rubisco activase — Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth Res 75: 11–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Portis AR and Parry MAJ (2007) Discoveries in Rubisco (Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase): a historical perspective. Photosynth Res 94: 121–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Price GD, Yu J-W, Von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Chow WS, Anderson JM, Hurry V and Badger MR (1995) Chloroplast cytochrome b 6/f and ATP synthase complexes in tobacco: transformation with antisense RNA against nuclear-encoded transcripts for the Rieske FeS and ATPd polypeptides. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Price GD, Von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Siebke K, Anderson JM and Badger MR (1998) Photosynthesis is strongly reduced by antisense suppression of chloroplastic cytochrome bf complex in transgenic tobacco. Aust J Plant Physiol 25: 445–452Google Scholar
  106. Quick WP, Schurr U, Scheibe R, Schulze E-D, Rodermel SR, Bogorad L and Stitt M (1991) Decreased ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase in transgenic tobacco transformed with “antisense” rbcS. I. Impact on photosynthesis in ambient growth conditions. Planta 183: 542–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Raines CA (2003) The Calvin cycle revisited. Photosynth Res 75: 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Raines CA (2006) Transgenic approaches to manipulate the environmental responses of the C3 carbon fixation cycle. Plant Cell Environ 29: 331–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Randall DA, Dazlich DA, Zhang, C, Denning, AS, Sellers PJ, Tucker CJ, Bounoua, L, Los SO, Justice CO and Fung I (1996) A revised land surface parameterization (Sib2) for Gcms.3. The greening of the Colorado State University General Circulation Model. J Climate 9: 738–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Ruuska SA, Andrews TJ, Badger MR, Price GD and Von Caemmerer S (2000a) The role of chloroplast electron transport and metabolites in modulating rubisco activity in tobacco. Insights from transgenic plants with reduced amounts of cytochrome b/f complex or glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Physiol 122: 491–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ruuska SA, Badger MR, Andrews TJ and Von Caem-merer S (2000b) Photosynthetic electron sinks in trans-genic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco: little evidence for significant Mehler reaction. J Exp Bot 51: 357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sage RF (1990) A model describing the regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, electron transport, and triose phosphate use in response to light intensity and CO2 in C3 plants. Plant Physiol 94: 1728–1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sage RF (2002) Variation in the k cat of Rubisco in C3 and C4 plants and some implications for photosyn-thetic performance at high and low temperature. J Exp Bot 53: 609–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sage RF, Sharkey TD and Seemann JR (1990) Regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity in response to light intensity and CO2 in the C3 annuals Chenopodium album L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol 94: 1735–1742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Sage RF, Santrucek J and Grise DJ (1995) Temperature effects on the photosynthetic response of C3 plants to long-term CO2 enrichment. Vegetatio 121: 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Salvucci ME and Crafts-Brandner SJ (2004a) Inhibition of photosynthesis by heat stress: the activation state of Rubisco as a limiting factor in photosynthesis. Physiol Plantarum 120: 179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Salvucci ME and Crafts-Brandner SJ (2004b) Relationship between the heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the thermal stability of rubisco activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments. Plant Physiol 134: 1460–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sellers PJ, Randall DA, Collatz GJ, Berry JA, Field CB, Dazlich DA, Zhang C, Collelo GD and Bounoua L (1996a) A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part 1: Model formulation. J Climate 9: 676–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sellers PJ, Los SO, Tucker CJ, Justice CO, Dazlich DA, Collatz GJ and Randall DL (1996b) A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part II: The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. J Climate 9: 706–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sellers PJ, Dickinson RE, Randall, DA, Betts AK, Hall FG, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, Denning AS, Mooney, HA, Nobre CA, Sato N, Field CB and Henderson-Sellers A (1997) Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science 275: 502–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sharkey TD (1985a) O2-insensitive photosynthesis in C3 plants — its occurrence and a possible explanation. Plant Physiol 78: 71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sharkey TD (1985b) Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: physics, physiology, and rate limitations. Bot Rev 51: 53–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sharkey TD, Bernacchi CJ, Farquhar GD and Singsaas EL (2007) Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30: 1035–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sharwood RE, Von Caemmerer S, Maliga P and Whitney SM (2008) The catalytic properties of hybrid Rubisco comprising tobacco small and sunflower large subunits mirror the kinetically equivalent source Rubiscos and can support tobacco growth. Plant Physiol 146: 83–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Stitt M and Sonnewald U (1995) Regulation of metabolism in transgenic plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46: 341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tcherkez G, Farquhar GD and Andrews TJ (2006) Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 7246–7251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Tcherkez G, Bligny R, Gout E, Mahe A, Hodges M and Cornic G (2008) Respiratory metabolism of illuminated leaves depends on CO2 and O2 conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 797–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Tenhunen JD, Yocum CS and Gates DM (1976) Development of a photosynthesis model with an emphasis on ecological applications 1. Theory. Oecologia 26: 89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Tenhunen JD, Sala Serra A, Harley PC, Dougherty RL and Reynolds JF (1990) Factors influencing carbon fixation and water use by mediterranean sclerophyll shrubs during summer drought. Oecologia 82: 381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tenhunen JD, Hanano R, Abril M, Weiler EW and Hartung W (1994) Above- and below-ground environmental influences on leaf conductance of Ceanothus Thyrsiflorus growing in a chaparral environment — drought response and the role of abscisic acid. Oecologia 99: 306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tazoe Y, Vyas P and Yano S (2006) Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. J Exp Bot 57: 343–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Von Caemmerer S (2000) Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  133. Von Caemmerer S (2003) C4 photosynthesis in a single C3 cell is theoretically inefficient but may ameliorate internal CO2 diffusion limitations of C3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1191–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Von Caemmerer S and Edmondson DL (1986) Relationship between steady-state gas exchange, in vivo ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity and some carbon-reduction cycle intermediates in Raphanus sativus. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 669–688Google Scholar
  135. Von Caemmerer S and Evans JR (1991) Determination of the average partial-pressure of CO2 in chloroplasts from leaves of several C3 plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 18: 287–305Google Scholar
  136. Von Caemmerer S and Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Von Caemmerer S and Farquhar GD (1984) Effects of partial defoliation, changes in irradiance during growth, short-term water stress and growth at enhanced p(CO2) on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 160: 320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Von Caemmerer S and Quick WP (2000) Rubisco: Physiology in vivo. In: Leegood RC, Sharkey TD and Von Caemmerer S (eds) Photosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism, pp 85–113. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  139. Von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Hudson GS and Andrews TJ (1994) The kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate car-boxylase/oxygenase in vivo inferred from measurements of photosynthesis in leaves of transgenic tobacco. Planta 195: 88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Walcroft AS, Whitehead D, Silvester WB and Kelliher FM (1997) The response of photosynthetic model parameters to temperature and nitrogen concentration in Pinus radiata D. Don. Plant Cell Environ 20: 1338–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wang YP and Leuning R (1999) Reply to a commentary on the use of a sun/shade model to scale from the leaf to canopy by D.G.G. de Pury and G.D. Farquhar. Agric Forest Meteorol 95: 261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wareing PF, Khalifa MM and Treharne KJ (1968) Rate-limiting processes in photosynthesis at saturating light intensities. Nature 220: 453–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Warren C (2007) Estimating the internal conductance to CO2 movement. Funct Plant Biol 34: 82–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Warren CR (2008) Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO2 transfer. J Exp Bot 59: 1475–1487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Warren CR and Dreyer E (2006) Temperature response of photosynthesis and internal conductance to CO2: results from two independent approaches. J Exp Bot 57: 3057–3067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Weis E (1981) The temperature-sensitivity of dark-inactivation and light-activation of the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in spinach-chloroplasts. FEBS Lett 129: 197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Weis E and Berry JA (1988) Plants and high temperature stress. Symp Soc Exp Biol 42: 329–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Whitehead D, Leathwick JR and Walcroft AS (2001) Modeling annual carbon uptake for the indigenous forests of New Zealand. Forest Sci 47: 9–20Google Scholar
  149. Whitney SM and Andrews TJ (2001) Plastome-encoded bacterial ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxy-lase/oxygenase (RubisCO) supports photosynthesis and growth in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 14738–14743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Whitney SM and Andrews TJ (2003) Photosynthesis and growth of tobacco with a substituted bacterial rubisco mirror the properties of the introduced enzyme. Plant Physiol 133: 287–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Whitney SM, Von Caemmerer S, Hudson GS and Andrews TJ (1999) Directed mutation of the Rubisco large subunit of tobacco influences photorespiration and growth. Plant Physiol 121: 579–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wise RR, Olson AJ, Schrader SM and Sharkey TD (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ 27: 717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wong SC, Cowan IR and Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Wong SC, Cowan IR and Farquhar GD (1985) Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation. I Influence of nitrogen nutrition, phosphorus nutrition, photon flux densitiy, and ambient partial pressure of CO2 during ontogeny. Plant Physiol 78: 821–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Woodrow IE and Berry JA (1988) Enzymatic regulation of photosynthetic CO2 fixation in C3 plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39: 533–594Google Scholar
  156. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby, M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen, JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont, BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Pyankov VI, Ronnet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ and Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Wullschleger SD (1993) Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants — a retrospective analysis of the A/C i curves from 109 species. J Exp Bot 44: 907–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Yamori W, Noguchi K and Terashima I (2005) Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis in spinach leaves: analyses of photosynthetic components and temperature dependencies of photosynthetic partial reactions. Plant Cell Environ 28: 536–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Yamori W, Noguchi K, Hanba YT and Terashima I (2006a) Effects of internal conductance on the temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate in spinach leaves from contrasting growth temperatures. Plant Cell Physiol 47: 1069–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Yamori W, Suzuki K, Noguchi K, Nakai M and Terashima I (2006b) Effects of Rubisco kinetics and Rubisco activation state on the temperature dependence of the photo-synthetic rate in spinach leaves from contrasting growth temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 29: 1659–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Yamori W, Noguchi K, Kashino Y and Terashima I (2008) The role of electron transport in determining the temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate in spinach leaves grown at contrasting temperatures. Plant Cell Phys-iol 49: 583–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Yin X, Van Oijen M and Schapendonk A (2004) Extension of a biochemical model for the generalized stoichiometry of electron transport limited C3 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 27: 1211–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Zelitch I (1989) Selection and characterization of tobacco plants with novel O2-resistant photosynthesis. Plant Phys-iol 90: 1457–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Zhu XG, Portis AR and Long SP (2004) Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 27: 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Zhu XG, de Sturler E and Long SP (2007) Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate: a numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. Plant Physiol 145: 513–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne von Caemmerer
    • 1
  • Graham Farquhar
    • 2
  • Joseph Berry
    • 3
  1. 1.Molecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Environmental Biology Group, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Global EcologyCarnegie Institution of WashingtonStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations