Stock recruitment (SR) modeling is the central part of fisheries population dynamics analysis. Models and modeling techniques on SR relationships have been evolving for decades, and have moved from traditional SR models, such as the Ricker and Beverton-Holt models to measurement error models, and Kalman filter time series models. Though SR models are evolving, people still typically select a specific model and then proceed as if the selected model had generated the data. This approach ignores the uncertainty in the model selection, leading to overconfident inferences and decisions with higher risk than expected. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) provides a coherent mechanism for accounting for this model uncertainty. In this study, Lake Erie walleye (Sander vitreus) fishery was used as an example. Six mathematical models were developed, which included a Ricker model, a hierarchical Ricker model, a residual auto-regressive model, a Kalman filter random walk model, a Kalman filter autoregressive model, and a Ricker measurement error model. The posterior distributions of estimated productivity and recruitment from these models were weighted based on the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) to provide our predictive posterior distribution of population productivity and recruitment over time. To test the efficiency of the Bayesian averaging approach and the uncertainty from model selection, a further simulation study was done based on the example fishery. Our results showed that model selection uncertainty is high and BMA explained the data reasonably well. We suggest that BMA is more appropriate in simulating SR models. The framework developed here can be used for other species population SR analysis. We also suggest that the model selection uncertainty be considered and the BMA be applied to other stock assessment models and even in the fisheries management decision making in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beamish RJ, Noakes DJ, McFarlane GA, Klyashtorin L, Ivanov VV, Kurashov V (1999) The regime concept and natural trends in the production of Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:516–526
Caswell H, Cohen JE (1995) Red, white and blue: environmental variance spectra and coexistence in metapopulations. J Theor Biol 176:301–316
De Valpine P, Hasting A (2002) Fitting population models incorporating process noise and observation error. Ecol Monogr. 72(1):57–76
Draper D (1995) Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty (with discussion). J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 57:45–97
Gelman A (2005) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Anal 2:1–19
Gilks WR (1996) Full conditional distributions. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 75–78
Glantz MH (1992) Climate variability, climate change and fisheries. CambrIDge University Press, CambrIDge
Halley JM (1996) Ecology, evolution and 1/f-noise. Trends Ecol Evol 11:33–37
Halley JM, Kunin WE (1999) Extinction risk and the 1/f family of noise models. Theor Pop Biol 56:215–230
Harley SJ, Myers RA, Dunn A (2001) Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1760–1772
Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT (1999) Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Statist Sci 14:382–417
Jiao Y, Chen Y (2004) An application of generalized linear model in production model and sequential population analysis. Fish Res 70:367–376
Jiao Y, ReID K, Nudds T (2006) Variation in the catchability of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in the fisheries of Lake Erie using a Bayesian error-in-variable approach. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1695–1704
Jiao Y, Neves R, Jones J (2008) Models and model selection uncertainty in estimating growth rates of endangered freshwater mussel populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:0000–0000 (in press)
Madigan D, Raftery AE (1994) Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam's window. J Am Statist Assoc 89:1535–1546
Morales JM (1999) Viability in a pink environment: why “white noise” models can be dangerous. Ecol Lett 2:228–232
Petchey OL (2000) Environmental colour affects aspects of single-species population dynamics. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 267:747–754
Peterman RM, Pyper BJ, Grout JA (2000) Comparison of parameter estimation methods for detecting climate-induced changes in productivity of Pacific salmon (Onchorhynchus spp.). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:181–191
Peterman RM, Pyper BJ, MacGregor BW (2003) Use of the Kalman filter to reconstruct historical trends in productivity of Bristol Bay sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60(7):809–824
Polacheck T, Hilborn R, Punt AE (1993) Fitting surplus production models: comparing methods and measuring uncertainty. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2597–2607
Quinn II TJ, Deriso RB (1999) Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 542 pp
Schwager M, Johst K, Jeltsch F (2006) Does red noise increase or decrease extinction risk? Single extreme events versus Series of unfavorable conditions. Am Nat 167:879–888
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J Roy Statist Soc B 64:583–640
Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2004) WinBUGS user manual (version 1.4.1). MRC Biostatistics Unit, CambrIDge, UK
Vasseur DA, Yodzis P (2004) The color of environmental noise. Ecol 85:1146–1152
Walleye Task Group (WTG) (2004) Report of the walleye task group to the standing technical committee, Lake Erie Committee of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. 26 pp
Walters CJ, Ludwig D (1981) Effects of measurement errors on the assessment of stock—recruit relationship. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:704–710
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiao, Y., Reid, K., Smith, E. (2009). Model Selection Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaging in Fisheries Recruitment Modeling. In: Beamish, R.J., Rothschild, B.J. (eds) The Future of Fisheries Science in North America. Fish & Fisheries Series, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9210-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9210-7_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9209-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9210-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)