Skip to main content

Locating Concealed Homicide Victims: Developing the Role of Geoforensics

  • Chapter
Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics

Historically police searches for homicide victims' graves have been undertaken by the use of large numbers of police, military and public volunteers, conducting visual or manual probe line searches covering formalised gridded sectored areas. Speculative digging of large areas of ground has also been employed with variable success. Mineral exploration geologists, engineering geologists and geohazards specialists traditionally investigate the ground using a range of methods and techniques. Before such ground investigations are undertaken, a conceptual geological model of the ground is developed. This provides information on, for example: tectonic setting, stratigraphy, lithology, structure, hydrogeology, hydrology, groundwater, hydrochemistry, superficial deposits, principal soil types, depth to bedrock, nature of bedrock interface, engineering and physical properties of the ground, geomorphological processes, mining, past land use, current land use, geological hazards and man's influences. In a similar way, the properties of a buried or concealed body may also be determined and how in particular these have influenced the geology. This provides estimates of the target's age, size, and geometry, expected depth of burial, time and duration of burial, state of preservation or decomposition, physical, chemical, hydrogeological and geotechnical variations compared to the surrounding ground. An understating of the undisturbed (pre-burial) and disturbed (post-burial) geology and the target (body and associated objects) properties are crucial before the correct search strategy and choice of instrumentation may be decided, and the optimum method of deployment identified. These may include geophysics, geochemistry, satellite imagery, air photo interpretation and invasive methods (such as auguring, drilling, trial pitting and trenching). Geological investigative techniques are applicable to law enforcement searches, since the underlying search philosophy, concepts and principles are similar. That is, there is a buried/ concealed ‘object’ or ‘target’ desirable to be found. The most important services a geologist can give the police and a law enforcement search strategist are: the production of a geological model of a potential grave site, an understanding of the geological and geomorphological processes, the characterisation and understanding of the origin, source and properties of the soils, rocks and target (body), and a choice of detecting methods. For the geologist (and other subject matter experts) to be effectively incorporated into a search team, he/she must be an effective communicator of complex geological (scientific) terminology, recognise the limitations of his/ her skills and capabilities and be aware of the boundaries and interface with other subject matter forensic experts. The principal objective of this chapter is to describe the effective and efficient processes to locate concealed victims of homicide. It also seeks to show how the combined skills and expertise of law enforcement and geoforensic search specialists enable the ground in the vicinity of homicide graves to be better understood and more professionally searched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspinall A and Lynam JT (1970). An induced polarization instrument for the detection of near surface features. Prospezioni Archeologiche 5:67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd RM (1979). Buried body cases. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 48:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRIA (2002). Geophysics in Engineering Investigations. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) Report C562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (1996). Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell P (2002). The Body Farm. Time Warner Paperbacks, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2002a). How forensic geology helps solve crime. Record of presentation on Forensic Geology and the Moors Murders to the House of commons, Westminster Palace, on 12th March 2002, with contributions from J.R. Hunter and B. Simpson. All-Party Parliamentary Group for Earth Sciences. Britis Geological Survery & International Mining Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2002b). Finding the silent witness: how forensic geology helps solve crimes. All-Party Parliamentary Group for Earth Science. The Geological Society of London. Geoscientist 12:24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2002c). Finding the silent witness. The Geological Society of London. Geoscientist 12:16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2003). The applications of forensic geology to help the police solve crimes. European geologist. Journal of the European Federation of Geologists 16:8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2004). Forensic geology; the discovery of spades on Saddleworth Moor. Geology Today 20:42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2006). The inaugural meeting of The Geological Society of London Forensic Geoscience Group. Geoscientists at Crime Scenes. Forensic Geoscience Group Meeting. The Geological Society of London, Burlington House, 20 December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly L.J. (2008). Communication in geology: A personal perspective and lessons from volcanic, mining, exploration, geotechnical, police and geoforensic investigations. In: Liverman D.G.E, Pereira C.P. & Marker B. (eds) Communicating Environmental Geoscience. Geological Society, London, Special Publication 350: 107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Emsley SJ and Bishop I (1997). Application of the microgravity technique to cavity location in the investigation for major civil engineering works. Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology. The Geological Society Engineering Group Special Publication 12:183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenning PJ and Donnelly LJ (2004). Geophysical techniques for forensic investigations. The Geological Society of London Special Publication 232:11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlic B and Lancaster WJ (1986). Electromagnetic surveying in current Middle Eastern archaeology: application and evaluation. Geophysics 51:1414–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney C, Gater J and Ovenden S (2002). The use of geophysical techniques in archaeological evaluation. Institute of Field Archaeologists, University of Reading, Papers 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammon WS, McMechan GA and Xiaoxian Z (2000). Forensic GPR-finite-difference simulation of responses from buried remains. Journal of Applied Geophysics 45:171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison M, Hedges C and Sims C (2006). Practice Advice on Search Management and Procedures (Eds). National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM, Henkart PC and Conyers LB (2002). Comparison of seismic reflection and ground penetrating radar imaging at the controlled archaeological test site, Champaign, Illinois. Archaeological Prospection 9:9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter J and Cox M (2005). Forensic Archaeology Advances in Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis Oxon, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Killam EW (2004). The Detection of Human Remains. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall KA, Fenning PJ, Cooke DA, Preston H, Brown A, Hazzard J and Smith T (2002). Non-intrusive investigation techniques for groundwater pollution studies. Research & Development Technical Report P2-178/TR/1. Environment Agency, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann DM, Culshaw MG and Fenning PJ (1997). Setting the standard for geophysical surveys in site investigation. In: Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology (Eds. DM McCann, M Eddleston, PJ Fenning and GM Reeves). The Geological Society of London Engineering Geology Special Publication 12:3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann DM and Fenning PJ (1995). Estimation of rippability and excavation conditions from seismic velocity measurements. In: Engineering Geology of Construction (Eds. M Eddleston, S Walthall, JC Cripps and MG Culshaw). The Geological Society of London Special Publication 110:335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellett JS (1992). Location of human remains with ground penetrating radar. Fourth International Conference on GPR. Geological Survey of Finland Special Paper 16:359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellett JS (1996). GPR in forensic and archaeological work: hits and misses. Proceedings of Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. SAGEEP Conference 1991 Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society. Co., USA, 487–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller M (2002). Coupling Ground Penetrating Radar Applications with Continually Changing Decomposing Human Targets: An Effort to Enhance Search Strategies of Buried Human Remains. MA thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray RC (2004). Evidence from the Earth. Forensic Geology and Criminal Investigations. Mountain Press, Missoula, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noël M (1992). Multielectrode resistivity tomography for imaging archaeology. In: Geoprospection in the Archaeological Landscape (Ed. R Spoerry), pp. 89–99. Oxbow Monograph 18, Oxbow Books, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye K and Croft DJ (2004). Forensic Geoscience: Principles Techniques and Applications (Eds. K Pye and DJ Croft). The Geological Society of London Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A (2005a). Forensic geoscience. Geology Today 22:69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A (2005b). Burial location using cheap and reliable quantitative probe measurements. Diversity in Forensic Anthropology, Special Publication of Forensic Science International. Forensic Science International 151:207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A (2005c). Searching for the I.R.A. Disappeared: ground-penetrating radar investigation of a churchyard burial site, Northern Ireland. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50:414–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A (2006). Freshwater under water scene of crime reconstruction using freshwater ground-penetrating radar (GPR) in the search for an amputated leg and jet-ski, Northern Ireland. Science and Justice 46:133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A, Geraghty L, Brown C and Barton K (2004). Ground-penetrating radar facies as an aid to sequence stratigraphic analysis: application to the archaeology of Clonmacnoise Castle, Ireland. Archaeological Prospection 11:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A and Mckinley, J (2008). Geoforensics. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Geological Society of London (1988). Engineering Group working party report on engineering geophysics. The Working Party Report on Engineering Geophysics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrison, M., Donnelly, L.J. (2009). Locating Concealed Homicide Victims: Developing the Role of Geoforensics. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics