Skip to main content

Tracing Soil and Groundwater Pollution with Electromagnetic Profiling and Geo-Electrical Investigations

  • Chapter
Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics

Geophysical investigation is used to differentiate lithological units. In addition to this, geophysics is also useful for the detection, definition and monitoring of pollution in the ground, on the condition that the pollution, due to spills, leakage or illegal discharges causes a significant difference in conductivity/resistivity. The methodology of geophysical investigation in environmental issues will be illustrated. The first presented method is the electromagnetic profiling method, which measures the lateral variation in ground conductivity using a transmitter and a receiver. At the transmitter coil, a time-varying electromagnetic field is induced by an alternating current. This field interacts with the ground, proportional to ground conductivity. The resulting field is measured and recorded by the receiver. The background conductivity needs to be defined along a profile in a non-polluted zone. Subsequently, all the collected data can be used to plot the lateral variation in conductivity. Areas with higher conductivity reflect in most cases pollution from which the source can be traced. A second method is geo-electrical tomography, which is a combination of resistivity profiling and sounding where a large number of electrodes are placed at a constant distance along a line. During each measurement, the electrical potential caused by a current sent into the soil by two current electrodes is measured between the two potential electrodes. By automatically addressing a combination of four electrodes, and increasing the distance between the electrodes, the depth of penetration increases. Considering the resistivity of the corresponding lithology, pollution along the profile can be delimited vertically and horizontally. Finally, the investigation of the conductivity (resistivity) carried out with borehole loggings delivers information on the vertical distribution of the conductivity in the groundwater reservoir, resulting in the vertical delimitation of pollution close to the borehole. A great advantage for these methods applied to soil pollution consists in the avoidance of direct contact with the pollution, resulting in a reduction of health risks. These methods are non-destructive and fairly fast investigations are possible. They will be illustrated by case studies where the results are validated based on the analyses of soil and groundwater samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Greenhouse JP and Harris RD (1983). Migration of contaminants at a landfill: a case study 7.DC, VLF, and inductive resistivity surveys. Journal of Hydrology 63:177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse JP and Slaine DD (1986). Geophysical modeling and mapping of contaminated groundwater around three waste disposal sites in southern Ontario. Canadian Geotechnology Journal 23:372–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra P, Lahti R, Hild J, Bates CR and Phillips D (1992). Case histories of shallow time domain electromagnetics in environmental site assessment. Ground Water Monitoring Review (12)4:110–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya M., Özürlan G and Sengül E (2007). Delineation of soil and groundwater contamination using geophysical methods at a waste disposal site in Canakkale, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 135:441–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali K, Yüksel FA and Yeken T (1998). Integrated use of hydrochemistry and resistivity methods in groundwater contamination caused by a recently closed solid waste site. Environmental Geology 36:227–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH (2002). RES2DINV ver.3.50. Rapid 2-D resistivity and IP inversion using the least-squares method. Wenner (α, β, γ), dipole-dipole, inline pole-pole, pole-dipole, equatorial dipole-dipole, Schlumberger and non-conventional arrays. On land, underwater and cross-borehole surveys. Geoelectrical Imaging 2-D and 3-D. Geotomo Software. Malaysia. 115p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH and Barker RD (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting 44:31–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack T J (1993). Detection of contaminant plumes by borehole geophysical logging. Ground Water Monitoring Review 13:107–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens K, Beeuwsaert E and Walraevens K (2003). Geo-electrical tomography in the framework of soil investigation (in Dutch). Laboratory for Applied Geology and Hydrogeology. Ghent University. p.36 + annexes.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil JD (1980). Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Technical Note TN-6. Geonics Ltd., Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro Santos FA, Mateus A, Figueiras J and Gonçalves MA (2006). Mapping groundwater contamination around a landfill facility using the VLF-EM method—A case study. Journal of Applied Geophysics 60:115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes DC, Armstrong MJ and Close ME (2000). Delineation of a landfill leachate plume and flow channels in coastal sands near Christchurch, New Zealand, using a shallow electromagnetic survey method. Hydrogeology Journal 8:328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart M and Bretnall R (1986). Interpretation of VLF resistivity data for ground water contamination surveys. Ground Water Monitoring Review 6:71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walraevens K, Beeuwsaert E and De Breuck W (1997). Geophysical methods for prospecting industrial pollution: a case study. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2:95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walraevens K, Coetsiers M and Martens K (2005). Large-scale mapping of soil and groundwater pollution to quantify pollution spreading. In: Soil and Sediment Remediation. Mechanisms, Technologies and Applications (Eds. P Lens, T Grotenhuis, G Malina and H Tabak), pp. 37–48. Integrated Environmental Technology Series. IWA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JH, Lapham WW and Barringer TH (1993). Application of electromagnetic logging to contamination investigations in glacial sand-and-gravel aquifers. Ground Water Monitoring Reviews 13:129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine Martens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martens, K., Walraevens, K. (2009). Tracing Soil and Groundwater Pollution with Electromagnetic Profiling and Geo-Electrical Investigations. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics