Skip to main content

Assessment of Seismic Capacity of Existing Buildings – Effects of Uncertainties

  • Conference paper
  • 1382 Accesses

The seismic capacity of three buildings used as telecommunication centers in Greece is assessed based on design drawings that do not reflect accurately the “as built structure” and on limited information about the soil conditions. The buildings were designed under the old Greek codes for Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete structures, already known to be quite inadequate both in the characterization of the seismic action and in providing sufficient strength and ductility to the structural members and the building as a whole. Steel telecommunication towers with several disk antennas had been added to the building roofs at later times. With limited knowledge about the type of soil at the building sites, the effect of soil flexibility was first examined in a parametric way and subsequently the assessment of the buildings' capacities was made on the basis of both elastic dynamic and inelastic static (pushover) analyses. For the latter analyses, the main uncertainty that was hereby addressed was the selection of a suitable horizontal load distribution. It was observed that different distribution may lead to different results regarding the buildings' capacity. However, in all cases examined, it was found that a drastic intervention would be needed to bring all three buildings up to current standards of increased seismic safety required by the new code for high importance telecommunication buildings that should stay operational during a strong, design level, earthquake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • API-RP2A (1975) “API recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms”, 10th Edition, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC (Applied Technology Council) (1996) “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,” ATC (Report N° ATC-40), Redwood City, California

    Google Scholar 

  • CSi (Computers and Structures Inc.) (2007) SAP 2000 Advanced Structural Analysis Program, CSi, California

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardisation) (2001) “European Standard EN 1991-1-1: Eurocode 1 — Actions on structure — Part 1-1: General actions — Densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildings,” CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardisation) (2004a) “European Standard EN 1992-1-1: Eurocode 2 — Design of concrete structures — Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings,” CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardisation) (2004b) “European (draft) Standard EN 1998-1: Eurocode 8 — Design of structures for earthquake resistance — Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings — Stage 49,” CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2000) “FEMA 356: Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” FEMA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates W. E., Marshall P. W. and Mahin S. A. (1977) “Analytical methods for determining the ultimate earthquake resistance for fixed offshore structures,” Proceedings of the 9th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallaby J. and Millman D. (1975) “Inelastic analysis of fixed offshore platforms for earthquake loadings”. OTC #2357, Proceedings of the 7th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • OASP (Greek Organization for Seismic Planning and Protection) (2000) “Greek seismic design code,” OASP, Greek Ministry for Environmental Planning and Public Works, Athens, Greece (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • OASP (Greek Organization for Seismic Planning and Protection) (2004) “Greek retrofitting code — First draft version,” OASP, Greek Ministry for Environmental Planning and Public Works, Athens, Greece (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • OASP (Greek Organization for Seismic Planning and Protection) (2006) “Greek retrofitting code — second draft version,” OASP, Greek Ministry for Environmental Planning and Public Works, Athens, Greece (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stavros Anagnostopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baros, D., Kyrkos, M., Maravas, A., Anagnostopoulos, S. (2009). Assessment of Seismic Capacity of Existing Buildings – Effects of Uncertainties. In: Mucciarelli, M., Herak, M., Cassidy, J. (eds) Increasing Seismic Safety by Combining Engineering Technologies and Seismological Data. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9196-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics