Traditionally, an advocate is “one called to” the aid of another (Tasker, 1926, pp. 139–140). A friend or member of the family, who does not have the standing or resources necessary to speak, may be in need of intervention and representation. A professional analyzes a case and makes a recommendation to a client who must evaluate, respond, and choose. A cause, whose time has come, may demand support or opposition by virtue of interests threatened to self or allies. In all these situations, “one who pleads, intercedes, or speaks for, or in behalf of, another” is an advocate (Advocate, 1991, p. 194). Such arguers “adopt a stance, advance a cause, and attempt to produce the result in behalf of an interest of a person, group or cause” (Cohen, 2004, p. 9).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Advocate. (1911). In The Encyclopaedia Britannica (11th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
Advocate. (1991). In A. H. Murry, H. Bradley, W. A. Craigie, & C. T. Onions (Eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed., Vol. 1, p. 194). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bingham, C. (1998). The Columbian Orator: Containing a Variety of Original and Selected Pieces Together with Rules, Which are Calculated to Improve Youth and Others, in the Ornamental and Using Art of Eloquence. New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1797).
Belloni, R. (2001). Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 163–180.
Blackmore, S. J. (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blogosphere. (n. d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved July 22, 2006, from http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blogosphere.
Bob, C. (2001). Marketing rebellion: Insurgent groups, international media, and NGO support. International Politics, 38, 311–334.
Booth, C. (1967). Charles Booth’s London: A Portrait of the Poor at the Turn of the Century, Drawn from his Life and Labour of the People of London. New York: Pantheon.
Branham, J. (1994). Debate and dissent in late Tokugama and Meiji Japan [Electronic version]. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30. Retrieved July 21, 2006, from Questia database.
Campbell, G. (2002). Blood Diamonds: Tracing the Deadly Path of the World’s most Precious Stones. Boulder. CO: Westview Press.
Chenevix, R. (1832). An Essay Upon National Character (Vol. 1). London: James Duncan, Pater Noster-Row.
Cicero, M. T. (1913). Cicero: De Officiis (T. E. Page & W. H. D. Rouse, Eds.; W. Miller, Trans.). London: William Heinemann.
Cicero, M. T. (1949). De Inventione. De Optimo Genere Oratorum. Topica (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cicero, M. T. (1948). In T. E. Page, E. Capps, W. H. D. Rouse, L. A. Post, & E. H. Warmington, (Eds.), Cicero: De Oratore I, II (Vol. 1) (E. W. Sutton, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cicero, M. T. (1930). The speech in defence of Sextus Roscius of America. (J. H. Freese, Trans.). In T. E. Page, E. Capps, & W. H. D. Rouse (Eds.), Cicero: The Speeches with an English Translation: Pro Publio Quinctio; Pro Sexto Roscio Amerino; Pro Quinto Roscio Comoedo; De Lege Agaria II. 6 (pp. 122–265). London: William Heinemann.
Cohen, E. S. (2004). Advocacy and advocates: Definitions and ethical dimensions. Generations, 28, 9–16.
Cox, J. R., & McCloskey, M. (1996). Advocacy and the Istook amendment: Efforts to restrict the civic speech of nonprofit organizations in the 104th Congress. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 273–291.
de Tocqueville, A. (1945). Democracy in America by Alexis De Tocqueville (Vol 1.). (F. Bowen, Ed.; Henry Reeve, Trans.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Original work published 1841).
Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dewatripont, M. & Tirole, J. Advocates. (1999). Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1–36.
Douglas, F. D. (1997). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from Berkeley Digital Library. (Original work published 1845).
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, D. (1983 ). Risk and culture: An Essay on the Selection and Detection of Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 13–28) . Amsterdam: Sic Sat Press.
Ekirch, A. A., Jr. (1974). Progressivism in America: A Study of the Era from Theodore Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson. New York: Franklin Watts.
Fantham, E. (2004). The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freddolino, P. P., Moxley, D. P., & Hyduk, C. (2004). A differential model of advocacy in social work practice. Families in Society, 85, 119–128.
Foster, F. S. (1979). Witnessing Slavery: The Development of Ante-Bellum Slave Narratives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Gilbert, N. G. (1997). Advocacy research and social policy. Crime and Justice, 22, 101–148.
Goodnight, G. T. (2003). The wiles of deliberation: Protodeliberation and heroic prudence in Homer’s Odyssey. In F. H. Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeckvan Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation (pp. 283–296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goodnight, G. T. (2006). When reasons matter most: pragma-dialects and the problem of informed consent. In P. Houtlosser & A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 74–87). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
Guerard, A. (1934). Herder’s spiritual heritage: Nationalism, romanticism, democracy. Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 174, 1–8.
Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. (T. Berger, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962).
Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communication Action (Vol. 1). (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Harrison, S. A. (2001, August 1). The internet, cyberadvocacy, and citizen communication. Vital Speeches of the Day, 624–626.
Hawes, J. M. (1991). The Children’s Rights Movement: A History of Advocacy and Protection. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
Heath, R. L. (1980). Corporate advocacy: An application of speech communication perspectives and skills – and more. Communication Education, 29, 370–377.
Hofstadter, R. (1955). The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F. D. R. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Johnston, J. & Laxer, G. (2003). Solidarity in the age of globalization: Lessons from the anti-MAI and Zapatista struggles. Theory and Society, 32, 39–91.
Jørgensen, C. (1998). Public debate – an act of hostility? Argumentation, 12, 431–443.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. ISSJ, 159, 89–101.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kennedy, G. (1968). The rhetoric of advocacy in Greece and Rome. The American Journal of Philology, 89, 419–436.
Klotz, A. (2002). Transnational activism and global transformations: The Anti-Apartheid and abolitionist experiences. European Journal of International Relations, 8, 49–76.
Klumpp, J., Hollihan, T., & Riley, P. (2001). Globalizing argument theory. In G. T. Goodnight (Ed.), Arguing Communication and Culture: Proceedings of the 12th SCA/NCA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 578–587). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Lens, V. (2005). Advocacy and argumentation in the public arena: A guide for social workers. Social Work, 50, 231–238.
Levy, D. A., & Nail, P. R. Contagion: A theoretic and empirical review and reconceptualization [Electronic version]. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 119. Retrieved July 21, 2006, from Questia database.
Mann, A. (Ed.). (1963). The Progressive Era: Liberal Renaissance or Liberal Failure? New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Maslin, S. (2004). Mine Action After Diana: Progress in the Struggle against Landmines. London: Pluto Press.
May, J. (1981). The rhetoric of advocacy and patronclient identification: Variation on a theme. The American Journal of Philology, 102, 308–315.
McElligott, J. N. (1855/1859). The American Debater: Being a Plain Exposition of the Principles and Practice of Public Debate (3rd ed.). Chicago: S. C. Griggs & Col.
McGuigan, J. (2000). British identity and ‘the people’s princess.’ Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1–17.
Mill, J. S. (1988). Women’s suffrage [3] 12 January 1871. In J. M. Robson & B. L. Kinzer (Eds.), Public and Parliamentary Speeches by John Stuart Mill July 1869-March 1873 (pp. 402–409). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mundy, K., & Murphy, L. (2001). Transnational advocacy, global civil society? Emerging evidence from the field of education. Comparative Education Review, 45, 85–126.
Olson, K. M., & Goodnight, G. T. (1994). Entanglements of consumption, cruelty, privacy, and fashion. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 249–276.
Plaint. (1991). In A. H. Murry, H. Bradley, W. A. Craigie, & C. T. Onions (Eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed) (Vol. 11, p. 956). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Polletta, F. (1999). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Contemporary Sociology, 28, 96–97.
Powell, J., & Paterson, J. (Eds.). (2004). Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Quintilian. (1921). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Book IV, 1, 6 (Vol. 2). (E. Capps, T. E. Page & W. H. D. Rouse, Eds. ; H. E. Butler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Loeb.
Roby, H. J. (1902). Roman Private Law in the Times of Cicero and of the Antonines (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (1997). Along Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schuetz, J. (1990). Corporate advocacy as argumentation. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 272–284). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Stanton, E. C. (1981). Stanton, ‘The Solitude of Self,’ January 18, 1892. In E. C. Dubois (Ed.), Elizabeth Cady Stanton-Susan B. Anthony, Correspondence, Writings, Speeches (pp. 247–254). New York: Shocken Books.
Stears, M. (2002). Progressives, Pluralists, and the Problems of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strange, S. (1996). The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellnow, T. L., & Brand, J. D. (2001). Establishing the structure of reality for an industry: Model and anti-model arguments as advocacy in Nike’s crisis communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 278–295.
Tam, I. J. (2004). Dangerous appetites: Human rights activism and conflict commodities. Human Rights Quarterly, 26, 687–704.
Tasker, J. G. T. (1926). Advocate. In James Hastings (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics (Vol. 1, pp. 139–140). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Technocrati. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved July 22, 2006, from http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocrati.
Timberlake, E. W., Jr. (1922). Origin and development of advocacy as a profession. Virginia Law Review, 9, 25–40.
Urbinati, N. (1999, October 11). Rhetoric and Representation: The Politics of Advocacy. Political Theory Workshop, University of Chicago. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from http://ptw.uchicago.edu/urbinati99.pdf.
Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory, 28, 758–786.
Thucydides. (2006). History of The Peloponnesian War. (R. Crawley, Trans.). Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar. 2. second. html (Original work 431 B.C.E.).
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam: Sic Sat Press.
Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Willard, C. A. (1996). Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yunis, H. (1996). Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodnight, G.T. (2009). The Duties of Advocacy: Argumentation Under Conditions of Disparity, Asymmetry, and Difference. In: van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B. (eds) Pondering on Problems of Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9164-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9165-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)