Skip to main content

The Duties of Advocacy: Argumentation Under Conditions of Disparity, Asymmetry, and Difference

  • Chapter
Pondering on Problems of Argumentation

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 14))

Traditionally, an advocate is “one called to” the aid of another (Tasker, 1926, pp. 139–140). A friend or member of the family, who does not have the standing or resources necessary to speak, may be in need of intervention and representation. A professional analyzes a case and makes a recommendation to a client who must evaluate, respond, and choose. A cause, whose time has come, may demand support or opposition by virtue of interests threatened to self or allies. In all these situations, “one who pleads, intercedes, or speaks for, or in behalf of, another” is an advocate (Advocate, 1991, p. 194). Such arguers “adopt a stance, advance a cause, and attempt to produce the result in behalf of an interest of a person, group or cause” (Cohen, 2004, p. 9).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Advocate. (1911). In The Encyclopaedia Britannica (11th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advocate. (1991). In A. H. Murry, H. Bradley, W. A. Craigie, & C. T. Onions (Eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed., Vol. 1, p. 194). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C. (1998). The Columbian Orator: Containing a Variety of Original and Selected Pieces Together with Rules, Which are Calculated to Improve Youth and Others, in the Ornamental and Using Art of Eloquence. New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1797).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, R. (2001). Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. J. (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blogosphere. (n. d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved July 22, 2006, from http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blogosphere.

  • Bob, C. (2001). Marketing rebellion: Insurgent groups, international media, and NGO support. International Politics, 38, 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C. (1967). Charles Booth’s London: A Portrait of the Poor at the Turn of the Century, Drawn from his Life and Labour of the People of London. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branham, J. (1994). Debate and dissent in late Tokugama and Meiji Japan [Electronic version]. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30. Retrieved July 21, 2006, from Questia database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G. (2002). Blood Diamonds: Tracing the Deadly Path of the World’s most Precious Stones. Boulder. CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenevix, R. (1832). An Essay Upon National Character (Vol. 1). London: James Duncan, Pater Noster-Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (1913). Cicero: De Officiis (T. E. Page & W. H. D. Rouse, Eds.; W. Miller, Trans.). London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (1949). De Inventione. De Optimo Genere Oratorum. Topica (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (1948). In T. E. Page, E. Capps, W. H. D. Rouse, L. A. Post, & E. H. Warmington, (Eds.), Cicero: De Oratore I, II (Vol. 1) (E. W. Sutton, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (1930). The speech in defence of Sextus Roscius of America. (J. H. Freese, Trans.). In T. E. Page, E. Capps, & W. H. D. Rouse (Eds.), Cicero: The Speeches with an English Translation: Pro Publio Quinctio; Pro Sexto Roscio Amerino; Pro Quinto Roscio Comoedo; De Lege Agaria II. 6 (pp. 122–265). London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. S. (2004). Advocacy and advocates: Definitions and ethical dimensions. Generations, 28, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. R., & McCloskey, M. (1996). Advocacy and the Istook amendment: Efforts to restrict the civic speech of nonprofit organizations in the 104th Congress. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1945). Democracy in America by Alexis De Tocqueville (Vol 1.). (F. Bowen, Ed.; Henry Reeve, Trans.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Original work published 1841).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripont, M. & Tirole, J. Advocates. (1999). Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, F. D. (1997). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from Berkeley Digital Library. (Original work published 1845).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, D. (1983 ). Risk and culture: An Essay on the Selection and Detection of Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 13–28) . Amsterdam: Sic Sat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekirch, A. A., Jr. (1974). Progressivism in America: A Study of the Era from Theodore Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson. New York: Franklin Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantham, E. (2004). The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freddolino, P. P., Moxley, D. P., & Hyduk, C. (2004). A differential model of advocacy in social work practice. Families in Society, 85, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, F. S. (1979). Witnessing Slavery: The Development of Ante-Bellum Slave Narratives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. G. (1997). Advocacy research and social policy. Crime and Justice, 22, 101–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, G. T. (2003). The wiles of deliberation: Protodeliberation and heroic prudence in Homer’s Odyssey. In F. H. Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeckvan Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation (pp. 283–296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, G. T. (2006). When reasons matter most: pragma-dialects and the problem of informed consent. In P. Houtlosser & A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 74–87). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerard, A. (1934). Herder’s spiritual heritage: Nationalism, romanticism, democracy. Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 174, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. (T. Berger, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communication Action (Vol. 1). (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. A. (2001, August 1). The internet, cyberadvocacy, and citizen communication. Vital Speeches of the Day, 624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, J. M. (1991). The Children’s Rights Movement: A History of Advocacy and Protection. Boston: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. L. (1980). Corporate advocacy: An application of speech communication perspectives and skills – and more. Communication Education, 29, 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1955). The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F. D. R. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. & Laxer, G. (2003). Solidarity in the age of globalization: Lessons from the anti-MAI and Zapatista struggles. Theory and Society, 32, 39–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. (1998). Public debate – an act of hostility? Argumentation, 12, 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. ISSJ, 159, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (1968). The rhetoric of advocacy in Greece and Rome. The American Journal of Philology, 89, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, A. (2002). Transnational activism and global transformations: The Anti-Apartheid and abolitionist experiences. European Journal of International Relations, 8, 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, J., Hollihan, T., & Riley, P. (2001). Globalizing argument theory. In G. T. Goodnight (Ed.), Arguing Communication and Culture: Proceedings of the 12th SCA/NCA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 578–587). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lens, V. (2005). Advocacy and argumentation in the public arena: A guide for social workers. Social Work, 50, 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. A., & Nail, P. R. Contagion: A theoretic and empirical review and reconceptualization [Electronic version]. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 119. Retrieved July 21, 2006, from Questia database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. (Ed.). (1963). The Progressive Era: Liberal Renaissance or Liberal Failure? New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslin, S. (2004). Mine Action After Diana: Progress in the Struggle against Landmines. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J. (1981). The rhetoric of advocacy and patronclient identification: Variation on a theme. The American Journal of Philology, 102, 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElligott, J. N. (1855/1859). The American Debater: Being a Plain Exposition of the Principles and Practice of Public Debate (3rd ed.). Chicago: S. C. Griggs & Col.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, J. (2000). British identity and ‘the people’s princess.’ Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1988). Women’s suffrage [3] 12 January 1871. In J. M. Robson & B. L. Kinzer (Eds.), Public and Parliamentary Speeches by John Stuart Mill July 1869-March 1873 (pp. 402–409). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, K., & Murphy, L. (2001). Transnational advocacy, global civil society? Emerging evidence from the field of education. Comparative Education Review, 45, 85–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, K. M., & Goodnight, G. T. (1994). Entanglements of consumption, cruelty, privacy, and fashion. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaint. (1991). In A. H. Murry, H. Bradley, W. A. Craigie, & C. T. Onions (Eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed) (Vol. 11, p. 956). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F. (1999). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Contemporary Sociology, 28, 96–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., & Paterson, J. (Eds.). (2004). Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintilian. (1921). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Book IV, 1, 6 (Vol. 2). (E. Capps, T. E. Page & W. H. D. Rouse, Eds. ; H. E. Butler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Loeb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby, H. J. (1902). Roman Private Law in the Times of Cicero and of the Antonines (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1997). Along Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, J. (1990). Corporate advocacy as argumentation. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 272–284). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, E. C. (1981). Stanton, ‘The Solitude of Self,’ January 18, 1892. In E. C. Dubois (Ed.), Elizabeth Cady Stanton-Susan B. Anthony, Correspondence, Writings, Speeches (pp. 247–254). New York: Shocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stears, M. (2002). Progressives, Pluralists, and the Problems of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1996). The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellnow, T. L., & Brand, J. D. (2001). Establishing the structure of reality for an industry: Model and anti-model arguments as advocacy in Nike’s crisis communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 278–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, I. J. (2004). Dangerous appetites: Human rights activism and conflict commodities. Human Rights Quarterly, 26, 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, J. G. T. (1926). Advocate. In James Hastings (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics (Vol. 1, pp. 139–140). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technocrati. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved July 22, 2006, from http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocrati.

  • Timberlake, E. W., Jr. (1922). Origin and development of advocacy as a profession. Virginia Law Review, 9, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (1999, October 11). Rhetoric and Representation: The Politics of Advocacy. Political Theory Workshop, University of Chicago. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from http://ptw.uchicago.edu/urbinati99.pdf.

  • Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory, 28, 758–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides. (2006). History of The Peloponnesian War. (R. Crawley, Trans.). Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar. 2. second. html (Original work 431 B.C.E.).

  • van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam: Sic Sat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, C. A. (1996). Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis, H. (1996). Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodnight, G.T. (2009). The Duties of Advocacy: Argumentation Under Conditions of Disparity, Asymmetry, and Difference. In: van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B. (eds) Pondering on Problems of Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics