Tracing the Sustainable Development of Nations with Integrated Indicators

Managing sustainable development as a policy issue is a complex task. The European Union Sustainable Development Strategy (CEC 2001) has stimulated EU member states to develop national sustainable development strategies. However policy makers are mostly lacking reliable and practical tools to measure progress and to indicate where adaptation to new or unbalanced developments is needed. In this chapter a new approach to develop an integrated sustainability index for nations is proposed and illustrated.

Since the UN World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) published its report ‘Our Common Future’, sustainable development has been accepted widely by governments, businesses and civil society as a common goal. Sustainable develop ment was defi ned in this report, I paraphrase, as our obligation to increase and not reduce overall devel opment possibilities for the next generations. We should leave our Earth behind in a better shape than we found her at the moment we were born, not only for moral reasons, but also to promote future pros perity. Many attempts have been made to defi ne the concept of sustainable development in a way that makes it possible to link operational targets to it. (Biesiot 1997; Bossel 1997; Daly and Cobb 1990; Hueting and Bosch 1990; Meadows 1998; Wackernagel and Rees 1996). As yet no defi nition obtained general support and I have not the pretense to provide the ultimat e solution to the operational ization of sustainability. But the proposals presented here may serve as a contribution from the viewpoint of a former policy-maker.


Corporate Social Responsibility Sustainable Development Saudi Arabia Economic Sustainability Sustainability Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biesiot, W. (1997). Respite time and response time. Balaton Bulletin, Fall 1997, 12 – 13.Google Scholar
  2. Bossel, H. (1997). Deriving indicators of sustainable development. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 1(4), 193 – 218.Google Scholar
  3. Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. A Report to the Balaton Group, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). (2001). A Sustainable Europe for a Better World, A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. COM 264, 15-5-2001, Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. (1990). For the common good, redirect ing the economy towards community, environment and a sus tainable future. London: Green Point.Google Scholar
  6. De Kruijf, H. A. M., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (1998). Following sustainable development in relation to the north-south dia logue: Ecosystem health and sustainability indicators. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 40, 4 – 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gladwin, T. N. (1999). Global sustainability: Challenges for environment and social equity. Paper presented at seminar on Sustainable Development, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Hueting, R., & Bosch, P. (1990). Note on the correction of national income for environmental losses. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 7(2), 75 – 83.Google Scholar
  9. Kaku, R. (1996). Cited in J. Jaworski, Synchronicity, the inner path of leadership (p. 164). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  10. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Maslow, A. H., Stephens, D. C., & Heil, G. (1998). Maslow on management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development, conception, application and further refl ections. New York: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
  13. Meadows, D. H. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. A Report to the Balaton Group, The Sustainability Institute, Hartland Four Corners.Google Scholar
  14. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Potomac (Signet).Google Scholar
  15. O'Conner, J. (1995). Real wealth of nations. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Soros, G. (1998). The crisis of global capitalism (pp. 176 – 187). New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Susskind, L. (1999). Super-optimization: A new approach to national environmental policy-making. Paper presented at seminar on Sustainable Development, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Swarttouw, K. (1999) personal communication.Google Scholar
  19. UNDP. (1996). Human development report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. UN World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society.Google Scholar
  22. Winsemius, P., & Guntram, U. (2002). Thousand shades of green. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  23. World Bank. (1995). Monitoring environmental progress: A report on work in progress. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. World Resources Institute, et al. (1998). World resources 1998 – 99. A guide to the global environment, World Resources Institute. Oxford/New York: United Nations Environment Programme/United Nations Development Programme/World Bank/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Zoeteman, K., & Harkink, E. (2005). Collaboration of national governments and global corporations in environmental man agement. In F. Wijen, K. Zoeteman, & J. Pieters (Eds.), A handbook of globalisation and environmental policy (pp. 179 – 210). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Zoeteman, B., van Reisen, O., & Kaashoek, B. (2007). Do global critical events impact organizational sustainability attitudes? The case of the airline industry. Aerlines Magazine, e-zine edition, 35, 1 – 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brabants Centre for Sustainability IsuesInternational Perspective at the Faculty for Economics and Business Administration at Tilburg University TelosTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations