Advertisement

A Rejoinder to Wilfred Beckerman and Herman Daly

According to Wilfred Beckerman, environmental considerations provide no grounds whatsoever for concern about the physical conditions under which future generations will have to live. In his opinion, a study of Sustainable National Income (SNI) designed to estimate the distance between actual and sustainable levels of production and consumption is therefore entirely superfl uous. The value of such a study rests, moreover, so Beckerman holds, on the erroneous notion that rights can be conferred upon future generations. Any undertaking on behalf of such generations can at best be based on ‘imperfect obligations’ borne of moral considerations.

Let me start with the second point. Conferring rights has nothing whatsoever to do with studying Sustainable National Income. The SNI according to Hueting is not based on the rights of future generations, nor on inter-generational equity, but on the preferences of the present generation for handing down the vital functions of our physical surroundings (the environment) intact to generations to come. There are two grounds for assuming such preferences. First, the existence of ‘blockages’ preventing these preferences from being expressed (Hueting and de Boer 2001b). Second, the postulate that ‘man derives part of the meaning of existence from the company of others'. These others include in any case his children and grandchildren. The prospect of a safer future is therefore a normal human need, and dimming of this prospect has a negative effect on welfare’ (Hueting 1987).

Keywords

Production Growth National Income Environmental Kuznets Curve Supply Curve Ecological Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hammond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., & Schutz, H. (1997). Resource fl ows: The material basis of industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  2. de Boer, B. (1996). Calculation of sustainable national income in the Netherlands: some results, paper prepared for the workshop Valuation Methods for Green Accounting. A Practical Guide, organized by The World Bank, UN Statistical Office and Ecological Economics, Washington, DC, March 20–22.Google Scholar
  3. de Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Opschoor, J. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 25, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, May 15, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. FAO (1990–1998). Yearbooks of fi shery statistics, catches and landings, 1990–1998. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  6. Feinberg, J. (1974). Non-Comparative Justice, in Philosophical Review, 83(3), 297–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainabil-ity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graedel, T. E., & Crutzen, P. J. (1993). Atmospheric change. W.H. Freeman: New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hueting, R. (1974). New scarcity and economic growth: More welfare through less production? Amsterdam: Agon Elsevier (Dutch ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland (English ed., 1980).Google Scholar
  10. Hueting, R. (1980). Environment and growth, expectations and scenarios. In S. K. Kuipers & G. J. Lanjouw (Eds.), Prospects of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Hueting, R. (1981). Comments on the report A low energy strategy for the United Kingdom. In G. Leach et al. (Eds.), Working party on integral energy scenarios. The Hague: The International Institute for the Environment and Development (IIED), 20 May.Google Scholar
  12. Hueting, R. (1987). An economic scenario that gives top priority to saving the environment. Ecological Modelling, 38(1/2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hueting, R. (1989). Correcting national income for environmental losses: towards a practical solution. In Y. Ahmad, S. El Serafy, & E. Lutz (Eds.), Environmental accounting for sustainable development Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  14. Hueting, R. (1990). The Brundtland report: A matter of confl icting goals. Ecological Economics, 2, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hueting, R. (1992). The economic functions of the environment. In P. Ekins & M. Max-Neef (Eds.), Real-life economics: Understanding wealth creation (pp. 61–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hueting, R. (2001). Three persistent myths in the environmental debate. In E. C. van Ierland, J. van der Straaten, H. R. J. Volleberg (Eds.), Economic growth and valuation of the environment (pp. 78–89). A Debate. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Hueting, R., & de Boer, B. (200la). The parable of the carpenter. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15(1), 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hueting, R. & de Boer, B. (2001b). Environmental valuation and sustainable national income according to Hueting. In E. C. van Ierland, J. van der Straaten, H. R. J. Vollebergh (Eds.), Economic growth and valuation of the environment. A Debate (pp. 17–77). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Hueting, R., Reijnders, L. (1998). Sustainability is an objective concept. Ecological Economics, 27(2), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hueting, R., Bosch, P., de Boer, B. (1992). Methodology for the calculation of sustainable national income, statistics Netherlands, Statistical Essays, M44, SDU/Publishers, ‘s-Gravenhage. Also Published as WWF International Report, Gland, Switzerland, June 1992.Google Scholar
  21. Hueting, R., Reijnders, L., de Boer, B., Lambooy, J., Jansen, H. M. A. (1998). The concept of environmental function and its valuation. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansson, T. B., Kelly, H., Reddy, A. K. N., & Williams, R. H. (1993). Renewable energy. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kendall, H.-W., & Pimentel, D. (1994). Constraints on the expansion of the global food supply. Ambio, 23, 198–205.Google Scholar
  24. Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia, a new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Marcuse, R. (1964). One dimensional man, the ideology of industrial society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  26. Odum, E. G. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, Penn: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  27. Reijnders, L. (1996). Environmentally improved production processes and products. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  28. Schipper, L., & Meyers, S. (1992). Energy effi ciency and human activity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Tinbergen, J. & Hueting, R. (1991). GNP and market prices: wrong signals for sustainable economic success that mask environmental destruction. In R. Goodland, H. Daly, S. El Serafy, & B. von Droste zu Huishoff (Eds.), Environmentally sustainable economic development: Building on Brundtland (pp. 39–52). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  30. Tolba, M. K., & El-Kholy, O. A. (Ed.). (1992). The world environment 1972–1992. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Verbruggen, H., Dellink, R., Gerlagh, R., Hofkes, M., & Jansen, H. M. A. (2001). Alternative calculations of a sustainable national income for the Netherlands according to Hueting. In E. C. van Ierland, J. van der Straaten, H. R. J. Vollebergh (Eds.), Economic growth and valuation of the environment, A Debate (pp. 275–312). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental StatisticsCentral Bureau of Statistics (CBS)The HagueThe Netherlands.

Personalised recommendations