Advertisement

National Policy Styles and Waste Management in The Netherlands and Bavaria

  • Jan Eberg

Many people will remember the controversy that arose around the Brent Spar oil platform in the summer of 1995. Plans by oil company Shell to sink their drilling platform in the open sea were opposed in public actions by the environmental organisation Greenpeace, leading on to wider protests, especially in Germany. Eventually, Shell withdrew its plans.

The question arises why the Germans in particular were so concerned, something even Greenpeace was at a loss to explain. Some commentators pointed to ‘a difference in national character’. One of them was Dutch journalist Willem Beusekamp, who related the Brent Spar affair to the aspect of the German ‘national soul’ embodied in the phrase Den Wald im Kopf, translatable as ‘forest-mindedness’, and equivalent to an almost mythical alliance with nature (Beusekamp 1995). It seems that nations may differ when it comes to the values accorded to nature and this in turn affects the processes of political decision-making. These national characteristics, including the socio-cultural roots of a country, are part of a broader set of institutional factors. In this chapter we examine the infl uence of these institutional factors on contemporary national waste policy.

Keywords

Waste Management Municipal Solid Waste Hazardous Waste Municipal Waste Waste Prevention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arentsen, M. J., & Eberg, J. W. (2001). Modulation of sociotech-nical change as climate change challenge. Dutch national research programme on global air pollution and climate change. Report no.: 410 200 100. Enschede: Twente University, 85, 63, 81.Google Scholar
  2. Beus, J. W. de, van Doorn, J. A. A., & Lehning, P. B. (1989). De ideologische driehoek. Nederlandse politiek in historisch perspectief. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  3. Beusekamp, W. (1995). ‘Brent Spar’, news paper article, de Volkskrant, June 11, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Boersema, J. J. (2001). The torah and the stoics on humankind and nature. A contribution to the debate on sustainability and quality. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Daalder, H. (1971). On building consociational nations. The case of the Netherlands and Switzerland. International Social Science Journal, 23, 355–370.Google Scholar
  6. Van Dieren, W. (1995). Het groene universum. Reisverhalen uit de wereld van het milieu (p. 227). Amsterdam: Van Lennep.Google Scholar
  7. Dobson, A., & Lucardie, P. (Eds.). (1993). The politics of nature. Explorations in green political theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Eberg, J. (1997). Waste policy and learning. Policy dynamics of waste management and waste incineration in the Netherlands and Bavaria. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  9. Elias, N. (1939, reprint 1978). The civilising process. The history of manners, and state formation and civilisation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Grin, J., & van de Graaf, H. (1996). Implementation as communicative action. An interpretative understanding of interactions between policy actors and target groups. Policy Sciences, 29(4), 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1993). The seven cultures of capitalism. Value systems for creating wealth in the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden, and The Netherlands (p. 267). New York: Piatkus.Google Scholar
  12. Hannigan, J. A. (1995). Environmental sociology. A social con-structionist perspective. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Heady, F. (1991). Public administration. A comparative perspective (4th ed., pp. 208 and 210). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  14. Heuss, T. (1964). Geist der Politik. Ausgewählte Reden (p. 11). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Bücherei.Google Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organisations. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (p. 127). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy, J. C. (1995). Nieuw Babylon in aanbouw. Nederland in de jaren zestig (p. 12). Amsterdam, Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
  17. Kraus, A. (1992). Grundzüge der Geschichte Bayerns (p. 146). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  18. Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lintsen, H. W. (Red.) (1992–1995). Geschiedenis van de Techniek in Nederland. De wording van een moderne samen-leving, 1800–1890. Walburg Pers.Google Scholar
  20. März, P. (Ed.). (1994). Geschichte des modernen Bayern. Königreich und Freistaat (p. 31). München: Bayerische Landeszentrale für politische Bildungsarbeit (A95).Google Scholar
  21. Middendorp, C. P. (1991). Ideology in Dutch politics. The democratic system reconsidered, 1970–1985 (p. 282). Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  22. Richardson, J. J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy styles in Western Europe (p. 13). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Richardson, J. J., & Watts, N. S. J. (1985). National policy styles and the environment. Britain and West Germany compared (p. 2 and 33). IIUG discussion paper 85–16. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
  24. Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. A guide to learning across time and space (p. 31). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  25. Rootes, C. (1995). Environmental consciousness, institutional structures and political competition in the formation and development of Green parties. In D. Richardson & C. Rootes (Eds.), <ie green challenge. The development of green parties in Europepp. 232–252). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schama, S. (1991). The embarrassment of riches. An interpretation of Dutch culture in the golden age (375 ff.). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  28. Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and memory. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Schwarz, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand. Redefi ning politics, technology and social choice. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  30. Strauss, F. J. (1989). Die Erinnerungen (p. 601, 603). Berlin: Siedler Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. van Waarden, F. (1995). Persistence of national policy styles: A study of their institutional foundations. In B. Unger, & F. van Waarden (Eds.), Convergence or diversity? Internationalisation and economic policy response (pp. 333– 372). Aldershot: Avebury, 357 and 358.Google Scholar
  33. Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Weber, M. (1904–1905).Die protestantische Ethik und der ‘Geist’ des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik (20, 21). Also in: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Volume 1. Tübingen: Mohr (1920).Google Scholar
  35. Wintle, M. (Ed.). (1994). Rhetoric and reality in environmental policy. The case of the Netherlands in comparison with Britain (p. 141). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  36. Wissenberg, M. (1993). The idea of nature and the nature of distributive justice. In A. Dobson, P. Lucardie (Eds.), The politics of nature. Explorations in green political theory (pp.3–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Zahn, E. (1991). Regenten, rebellen en reformatoren. Een visie op Nederland en de Nederlanders. Amsterdam: Contact.Google Scholar
  38. Zweers, W. (1994). Radicalism or historical consciousness: On breaks and continuity in the discussion of basic attitudes. In W. Zweers, & J. J. Boersema (Eds.), Ecology, technology and culture. Essays in environmental philosophy (pp. 63–72).Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Safety and Secutrity Management, Hogeschool of UtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations