Abstract
Approaches for modelling the distribution of animals in relation to their environment can be divided into two basic types, those which use records of absence as well as records of presence and those which use only presence records. For terrestrial species, presence-absence approaches have been found to produce models with greater predictive ability than presence-only approaches. This study compared the predictive ability of both approaches for a marine animal, the harbour porpoise (Phoceoena phocoena). Using data on the occurrence of harbour porpoises in the Sea of Hebrides, Scotland, the predictive abilities of one presence-absence approach (generalised linear modelling-GLM) and three presence-only approaches (Principal component analysis-PCA, ecological niche factor analysis-ENFA and genetic algorithm for rule-set prediction-GARP) were compared. When the predictive ability of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots, the presence-absence approach (GLM) was found to have the greatest predictive ability. However, all approaches were found to produce models that predicted occurrence significantly better than a random model and the GLM model did not perform significantly better than ENFA and GARP. The PCA had a significantly lower predictive ability than GLM but not the other approaches. In addition, all models predicted a similar spatial distribution. Therefore, while models constructed using presence-absence approaches are likely to provide the best understanding of species distribution within a surveyed area, presence-only models can perform almost as well. However, careful consideration of the potential limitations and biases in the data, especially with regards to representativeness, is needed if the results of presence-only models are to be used for conservation and/or management purposes.
Guest Editor: V. D. Valavanis Essential Fish Habitat Mapping in the Mediterranean
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, G. E., C. J. Thomas, D. C. Houston & D. B. A. Thompson, 1996. Predicting the spatial distribution of buzzard Buteo buteo nesting areas using a Geographical Information System and Remote Sensing. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1541–1550.
Barlow, J. & R. Gisiner, 2006. Mitigating, monitoring and assessing the effects of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 7: 239–250.
Beerling, D. J., B. Huntley & J. P. Bailey, 1995. Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: Use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 269–282.
Boyce, M. S., P. R. Vernier, S. E. Nielsen & F. K. A. Schmiegelow, 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157: 281–300.
Brotons, L., W. Thuiller, M. B. Araujo & A. H. Hirzel, 2004. Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography 27: 437–448.
Chambers, J. M. & T. J. Hastie, 1997. Statistical Models in Science. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Devlin, B., K. Roeder & L. Wasserman, 2003. False discovery or missed discovery? Heredity 91: 537–538.
Evans, P. G. H. & P. S. Hammond, 2004. Monitoring cetaceans in European waters. Mammal Review 34: 131–156.
Fielding, A. H. & J. F. Bell, 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38–49.
Garcia, L. V., 2004. Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies. Oikos 105: 657–663.
Garcia-Charton, J. A. & A. Perez-Ruzafa, 2001. Spatial pattern and the habitat structure of a Mediterranean rocky reef fish local assemblage. Marine Biology 138: 917–934.
Guisan, A. & U. Hofer, 2003. Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: Relation to climate and topography. Journal of Biogeography 30: 1233–1243.
Guisan, A. & N. E. Zimmerman, 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147–186.
Hirzel, H. A., J. Hausser & N. Perrin, 2000. Biomapper 2.0. Laboratory for Conservation Biology, University of Lausanne.
Hirzel, A. H., V. Helfer & F. Metral, 2001. Assessing habitatsuitability models with a virtual species. Ecological Modelling 145: 111–121.
Hirzel, A. H., J. Hausser, D. Chessel & N. Perrin, 2002. Ecological Niche-factor analysis: How to compute habitat suitability maps without absence data? Ecology 83: 2027–2036.
Ingram, S. N., L. Walshe, D. Johnston & E. Rogan, 2007. Habitat partitioning and the influence of benthic topography and oceanography on the distribution of fin and minke whales in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87: 149–156.
Laake, J. L., J. Calambokidis, S. D. Osmek & D. J. Rugh, 1997. Probability of detecting harbor porpoise from aerial surveys: Estimating g(0). Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 63–75.
Lerczak, J. A. & R. C. Hobbs, 1998. Calculating sightings distances from angular readings during shipboard, aerial and shore-based marine mammal surveys. Marine Mammal Science 14: 590–599.
Lindenmayer, D. B., H. A. Nix, J. P. McMahon, M. F. Hutchinson & M. T. Tanton, 1991. The conservation of Leadbeater’s possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri (McCoy): A case study of the use of bioclimatic modelling. Journal of Biogeography 8: 371–383.
MacLeod, C. D., 2000. Review of the distribution of Mesoplodon species (order Cetacea, family Ziphiidae) in the North Atlantic. Mammal Review 30: 1–8.
MacLeod, K., R. Fairbairns, A. Gill, B. Fairbairns, J. Gordon, C. Blair-Myers & E. C. M. Parsons, 2004. Seasonal distribution of minke whales Balaenoptera acutorostrata in relation to physiography and prey off the Isle of Mull, Scotland. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277: 263–274.
MacLeod, C. D., C. R. Weir, C. Pierpoint & E. J. Harland, 2007. The habitat preferences of marine mammals west of Scotland (UK). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87: 157–164.
MacLeod, C. D. & A. F. Zuur, 2005. Habitat utilisation by Blainville’s beaked whales off Great Abaco, Northern Bahamas, in relation to seabed topography. Marine Biology 147: 1–11.
Ortega-Huerta, M. & A. T. Peterson, 2004. Modelling spatial patterns of biodiversity for conservation prioritisation in north-eastern Mexico. Diversity and Distributions 10: 39–54.
Palka, D., 1996. Effects of Beaufort Sea state on the sightability of harbour porpoises in the Gulf of Maine. Report of the International Whaling Commission 46: 575–582.
Reutter, B. A., V. Helfer, A. H. Hirzel & P. Vogel, 2003. Modelling habitat-suitability on the base of museum collections: an example with three sympatric Apodemus species from the Alps. Journal of Biogeography 30: 581–590.
Robertson, M. P., N. Caithness & M. H. Villet, 2001. A PCA-based modelling technique for predicting environmental suitability for organisms from presence records. Diversity and Distributions 7: 15–27.
Robison, B. H., 2004. Deep pelagic biology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 300: 253–272.
Schulze, R. E. & R. P. Kunz, 1995. Potential shifts in optimum growth areas of selected commercial tree species and subtropical crops in southern Africa due to global warming. Journal of Biogeography 22: 679–688.
Sparholt, H., E. Aro & J. Modin, 1991. The spatial distribution of cod Gadus morhua L. in the Baltic Sea. Dana 9: 45–56.
Stockwell, D. & D. Peters, 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13: 143–158.
Teilmann, J., 2003. Influence of sea state on density estimates of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 5: 85–92.
Williams, A. K., 2003. The influence of probability of detection when modelling species occurrence using GIS and survey data PhD thesis, Blacksburg University, Blacksburg, USA.
Zaniewski, A. E., A. Lehman & J. M. Overton, 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of the New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling 157: 261–280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacLeod, C.D., Mandleberg, L., Schweder, C., Bannon, S.M., Pierce, G.J. (2008). A comparison of approaches for modelling the occurrence of marine animals. In: Valavanis, V.D. (eds) Essential Fish Habitat Mapping in the Mediterranean. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 203. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9141-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9141-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9140-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9141-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)