In this chapter we examine the application of NESs to the problem of seismic pro¬tection of frame structures, though other infrastructural systems such as towers, bridges, and so forth will likely benefit from this technology. As has often been noted, infrastructure in the United States alone constitutes a societal investment counted in the trillions of dollars. While the fraction of infrastructure vulnerable to large-scale earthquakes is relatively limited by geography (i.e., the west coast, midwest and southeast, in addition to Alaska and Hawaii, are historically the most vulnerable areas), seismic activity capable of causing property damage has been recorded throughout the country and around the world. This provides the impetus to develop effective strategies to protect not only new construction but also existing structures likely to be subjected to seismic effects.
Various passive methods for mitigating the effects of earthquakes have been ap¬plied to large scale structures, including auxiliary dampers, base isolation systems, tuned mass dampers, as well as active, semi-active and hybrid systems. Detailed de¬scriptions and a comparision of the performance and limitations of each of these are beyond the scope of this chapter. Rather, the interested reader should refer to several excellent monographs, including Soong and Constantinou (1994), Soong (1990), Skinner et al. (1993), Chu et al. (2005), and recent review articles (Housner et al., 1997; Spencer and Sain, 1997; Soong and Spencer, 2002; Spencer and Nagarajaiah, 2003), as well as references therein for details. It seems clear, given the recent exten¬sive body of literature and burgeoning number of isolated structures,1 that the need exists for a fully passive isolation strategy, lightweight and inexpensive but capable of high performance over an extensive range of earthquakes of different properties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chu, S.Y., Soong, T.T., Reinhorn, A.M., Active, Hybrid, and Semi-active Structural Control: A Design and Implementation Handbook, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005
DeSalvo, R., Passive, nonlinear, mechanical structures for seismic attenuation, J. Comp. Nonlinear Dyn. 2, 290–298, 2007
Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Cornwell, P.J., A computer toolbox for damage identification based on changes in vibration characteristics, in Structural Health Monitoring: Current Status and Perspectives, F-K. Chang (Ed.), Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, PA, USA, pp. 241–254, 1997
Georgiades, F., Nonlinear Localization and Targeted Energy Transfer Phenomena in Vibrating Systems with Smooth and Non-smooth Stiffness Nonlinearities, Ph.D. Thesis, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2006
Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skel-ton, R.E., Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.F., Yao, J.T.P., Structural control: Past, present, and future, ASCE J. Engrg. Mech. 123(9), 897–971, 1997
Ibrahim, S.R., Pappa, R.S., Large modal survey testing using the Ibrahim Time Domain identifica¬tion technique, AIAA J. Spacecraft Rockets 19(5), 459–465, 1982
Karayannis, I., Vakakis, A.F., Georgiades, F., Vibro-impact attachments as shock absorbers, Proc. IME C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. (Special Issue on ‘Vibro-impact Systems’, V. Babitsky, editor), 2008 (in press)
Kerschen G., On the Model Validation in Non-linear Structural Dynamics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Liege, Department of Aerospace, Mechanics and Materials Engineering, 2002
Kerschen, G., McFarland, D.M., Kowtko, J., Sup Lee, Y., Bergman, L.A., and Vakakis, A.F., Experimental demonstration of transient resonance capture in a system of two coupled oscillators with essential stiffness nonlinearity, J. Sound Vib. 299(4–5), 822–838, 2007
Lee, Y.S., Nucera, F., Vakakis, A.F., L.A. Bergman, D.M. McFarland, Periodic orbits and damped transitions of vibro-impact dynamics, Physica D, 2008 (submitted)
McFarland, D.M., Bergman, L.A., Vakakis, A.F., Experimental study of nonlinear energy pumping occurring at a single fast frequency, Int. J. Non-lin. Mech. 40(6), 891–899, 2005a
McFarland, D.M., Kerschen, G., Kowtko, J., Bergman, L.A., and Vakakis, A.F., Experimental investigation of targeted energy transfers in strongly and nonlinearly coupled oscillators, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 118(2), 791–799, 2005b
Nucera F., Nonlinear Energy Pumping as a Strategy for Seismic Protection, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calabria at Arcavacata of Rende, Cosenza, Italy, 2005
Nucera, F., Vakakis, A.F., McFarland, D.M., Bergman, L.A., Kerschen G., Targeted energy trans¬fers in vibro-impact oscillators for seismic mitigation, Nonlin. Dyn. (Special Issue on ‘Discon¬tinuous Dynamical Systems’) 50, 651–677, 2007
Nucera, F., McFarland, D.M., Bergman, L.A., Vakakis, A.F., Application of broadband nonlinear targeted energy transfers for seismic mitigation of a shear frame: Part I. Computational results, J. Sound Vib., 2008a (in press)
Nucera, F., Lo Iacono, F., McFarland, D.M., Bergman, L.A., Vakakis, A.F., Application of broad¬band nonlinear targeted energy transfers for seismic mitigation of a shear frame: Part II. Ex¬perimental results, J. Sound Vib. 313(1–2), 57–76, 2008b
Ohtori, Y., Christenson, R.E., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Dyke, S.J., Benchmark control problems for seis-mically excited nonlinear buildings, J. Eng. Mech. (Special Issue on ‘Benchmark Control Prob¬lems’) 130(4), 366–385, 2004
Skinner, R.I., Robinson, W.H., McVerry, G.H., An Introduction to Seismic Isolation, Chich-ester/Wiley, New York, 1993
Soong, T.T., Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice, Longman Scientific/Wiley, New York, 1990
Soong, T.T., Constantino, M.C., Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineer¬ing, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994
Soong, T.T., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice, Eng. Struct. 24, 243–259, 2002
Spencer, Jr., B.F., Dyke, S.J., Deoskar, H.S., Benchmark problems in structural control: Part I – Active mass driver system, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. (Special Issue on ‘Benchmark Structural Control Comparison’) 27, 1127–1139, 1998a
Spencer, Jr., B.F., Dyke, S.J., Deoskar, H.S., Benchmark problems in structural control: Part II – Active Tendon system, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (Special Issue on the Benchmark Structural Control Comparison) 27, 1141–1147, 1998b
Spencer, Jr., B.F., Christenson, R.E., Dyke, S.J., Next Ggeneration benchmark control problem for seismically excited buildings, in Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 1351–1360, 1998c
Spencer, Jr., B.F., Nagarajaiah, S., State of the art of structural control, ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 129(7), 845–856, 2003
Spencer, Jr., B.F., Sain, M.K., Controlling buildings: A new frontier in feedback, IEEE Contr. Systems Mag. (Special Issue on ‘Emerging Technology’) 17(6), 19–35, 1997
Storn, R., Price K., Differential evolution – A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optimiz. 11, 341–359, 1997
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Seismic Mitigation by Targeted Energy Transfer. In: Nonlinear Targeted Energy Transfer in Mechanical and Structural Systems. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 156. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9130-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9130-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9125-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9130-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)