Advertisement

“Definability,” “Conventionality,” and Simultaneity in Einstein–Minkowski Space-Time

  • Howard Stein
Chapter
  • 990 Downloads
Part of the The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science book series (WONS, volume 73)

In this article, I attempt to clarify certain misunderstandings that have contributed to continuing controversy over the status of the concept of relative simultaneity in the special theory of relativity. I also correct a number of technical errors in the literature of the subject, and present several new technical results that may further serve to clarify matters.

Controversy over the status of the concept of relative simultaneity in the special theory of relativity has proved remarkably durable. Very recently (within two days of first writing these words), as a result of ruminations on a recent paper of Adolf Grüunbaum's, I have come to believe that an important contributing factor to the persistence of the dispute is the use of certain key words (or phrases) in quite different senses by some of the disputants. One central aim of this paper, therefore, is to (try to) clarify these misunderstandings, and thereby both to reduce the number of the points of disagreement, and for the remaining points—for one can hardly expect all disagreement to be thus dispelled—at least to help clarify what the disagreements really are. A second aim is to correct some technical errors in the literature of the subject, and to state and prove some new technical results that may help contribute to clarity in the matter.

Keywords

Special Theory Inertial System Minkowski Plane Perpendicular Bisector Inertial Observer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Malament, David (1977). “Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity.” Noû s 11, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hogarth, Mark (2005). “Conventionality of Simultaneity: Malament's Result Revisited.”Foundations of Physics Letters18, 491–497.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stein, Howard (1991). “On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future.” Philosophy of Science 58, 147–167.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarkar, Sahotra, and Stachel, John (1999). “Did Malament Prove the Non-Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity?”Philosophy of ScienceM66, 208–220.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poincareé, Henri (1906). “La dynamique de l'électron.”Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo21, 129–176; reprinted inOeuvres de Henri Poincareé, vol. 9 (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1954), pp. 494–550. A brief summary of the main results had previously been given in theComptes rendusof the Acadeémie des Sciences, Paris, 140, 1504–8 (5 June 1905); Poincareé,Oeuvres, vol. 9, pp. 489–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lorentz, H.A. (1904). “Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with Any Velocity Less Than That of Light.”Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of Amsterdam6; reprinted in H.A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski and H. Weyl,The Principle of Relativity(Methuen, 1923; Dover, 1952).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Einstein, Albert (1905). “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Kö¨rper.”Annalen der Physik, series 4, 17, 891–921; reproduced inThe Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2, ed. John Stachel (Princeton, 1989), pp. 276–306.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruünbaum, Adolf (2001). “David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply.”http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000184(This is a prepublished essay and will appear as a chapter in Adolf Gruünbaum,Philosophy of Science in Action, vol. 1, to be published by Oxford University Press, New York–Information obtained from online “Bibliography for Adolf Grünbaum.”)
  9. 9.
    Poincaré, Henri (1900). “Les théories de la physique moderne.”Rapports du Congreés de Physique de 1900vol. 1; reprinted as Ch. X ofLa Science et l'Hypothese. An English translation by G. B. Halsted can be found in the collectionThe Foundations of Science(Lancaster, PA: The Science Press, 1913); this translation is superior to that found in the Dover edition ofScience and Hypothesis.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pais, Abraham (1982). ‘Subtle is the Lord…’ The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Einstein, Albert (1949). “Autobiographical Notes” inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P.A. Schilpp, Open Court Press, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reichenbach, Hans (1958).The Philosophy of Space and Time. Dover, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stein, Howard (1968). “On Einstein—Minkowski Space-Time.”The Journal of Philosophy65, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard Stein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations