# Balancing Necessity and Fallibilism: Charles Sanders Peirce on the Status of Mathematics and its Intersection with the Inquiry into Nature

- 1 Citations
- 1k Downloads

An interest in Charles Sanders Peirce and pragmatist thought in general emerged in the United States in the middle of last century to exert a powerful influence on a generation of American philosophers educated in the 1940s and 1950s, including Abner Shimony, whose thought is the occasion for this paper. Those threads in Peirce's work related to developing a scientifically informed worldview and metaphysics were the natural influences on Abner and this paper will begin by briefly reviewing a number of these threads and their influences in his writings. This sets the scene for the main project of the paper, an earlier historical project on a related aspect of Peirce's thought—his understanding of mathematics and its place in the description of nature. Mathematics was a foundational discipline for Peirce, one with qualities of necessity and certainty, features that stand in interesting contrast and tension to Peirce's view of an evolving nature which is governed by chance and our knowledge of which is always fallible and thus open to revision. Exploring these issues reveals deep background beliefs structuring Peirce's thought. The paper concludes in the contemporary realm with the speculation that due to the scientific developments of the 20th century, aspects of Peirce's work that formed a vision for a scientific metaphysics for earlier generations may be less relevant now. Nevertheless, the naturalistic spirit and orientation of Peirce's work remains compelling and productive.

## Keywords

Natural Science Pure Mathematics Mathematical Reasoning Mathematical Truth Hypothetical State## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.Peirce, Charles S. (1992).
*Reasoning and the logic of things: the Cambridge conferences lectures of 1898*. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Edited by Kenneth Laine Ketner; with an introduction by Kenneth Laine Ketner and Hilary Putnam.Google Scholar - 2.Haack, Susan (1996). “Between Scientism and Conversationalism.”
*Philosophy and Literature***20**(2): 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Buchler (1939), Justus (1939).
*Charles Peirce's Empiricism*. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar - 4.Nagel, Ernest (1940). “Charles S. Peirce, Pioneer of Modern Empiricism.”
*Philosophy of Science***7**: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Kloppenberg, James T. (1996). “Pragmatism: An Old Name for Some New Ways of Thinking?”
*Journal of American History***83**: 100–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Rockmore, T. (2004). “On the Structure of Twentieth-Century Philosophy.”
*Metaphilosophy***35**: 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Bernstein, Richard J. (1992). “The Resurgence of Pragmatism.”
*Social Research***59**: 813–840.Google Scholar - 8.Brent, Joseph (1993).
*Charles Sanders Peirce: a life*. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 9.Peirce, Charles S. (1992).
*The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings*, Vol. 1. Bloom-ington, IN, Indiana University Press. Edited with an introduction by Nathan Houser and Christian J. W. Kloesel.Google Scholar - 10.Peirce, Charles S. (1998).
*The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings*, Vol. 2. Bloom-ington, IN, Indiana University Press. Edited by the Peirce Edition Project; with an introduction by Nathan Houser.Google Scholar - 11.Goudge, Thomas A. (1950).
*The thought of C. S. Peirce*. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar - 12.Murphey, Murray G. (1961).
*The development of Peirce's philosophy*. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - 13.Hookway, Christopher (1985).
*Pe i rc e*. London/Boston, Routledge &Kegan Paul.Google Scholar - 14.Houser, Nathan, Don D. Roberts, and James Van Evra (1997) (eds.).
*Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce*. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar - 15.Peirce, Charles S. (1931–1958).
*Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce*. Vols. 1–8 Cambridge. Originally published: Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Edited by Paul Weiss and Charles Hartshorne and A. W. Burk.Google Scholar - 16.Peirce, Charles S. (1982).
*Writings of Charles S. Peirce: a chronological edition*. Blooming-ton, IN, Indiana University Press. Edited by Max Harold Fisch and Christian J. W. Kloesel.Google Scholar - 17.Gross, Neil (2003). “Richard Rorty's Pragmatism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Ideas.”
*Theory & Society***32**: 93–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Shimony, Abner (1993).
*Search for a naturalistic world view*. 2 volumes, Cambridge [England]/New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - 19.Shimony, Abner (2002). Transcript of oral history interview of Abner Shimony by Joan Bromberg, September 9 and 10, 2002. Niels Bohr Library, American Institute of Physics, 147 pp.Google Scholar
- 20.Haack, Susan (2005). “Formal Philosophy? A Plea for Pluralism” in Vincent F. Hendricks and John Symons, eds.,
*Formal Philosophy*, Automatic Press, pp. 77–98.Google Scholar - 21.Bernstein, Richard J. (2006). “Pragmatic Reflections on Tolerance.” Available online at http://www.pucp.edu.pe/eventos/congresos/filosofia/programageneral/lunes/plenaria/BernsteinRichard.pdf
- 22.Rockmore, T. (2005). “On Classical and Neo-Analytic Forms of Pragmatism.”
*Metaphiloso-phy***36**: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Shimony, Abner (1999). “Can the Fundamental Laws of Nature Be the Result of Evolution?” in C. Pagonis and J. Butterfield, eds.,
*From physics to philosophy*. Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–223.Google Scholar - 24.Davies, Paul (2007). “The Universe's Weird Bio-Friendliness.”
*The Chronicle of Higher Education***53**(31): B14.Google Scholar - 25.Skrbina, David (2005).
*Panpsychism in the West*. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar - 26.Shimony, Abner (2002). “Some Intellectual Obligations of Epistemological Naturalism” in D. B. Malement, ed.,
*Reading natural philosophy: essays in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics*. Chicago, IL, Open Court, pp. 297–313.Google Scholar - 27.Peirce, Charles S. (1979).
*The new elements of mathematics*. 4 volumes. The Hague, Mouton/ Humanities Press. Edited by Carol Eisele.Google Scholar - 28.Eisele, Carolyn (1979).
*Studies in the scientific and mathematical philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: essays by Carolyn Eisele*. The Hague/New York, Mouton. Edited by R. M. Martin.Google Scholar - 29.Joswick, Hugh (1988). “Peirce's Mathematical Model of Interpretation.”
*Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society***24**: 107–121.Google Scholar - 30.Levy, Stephen H. (1997). “Peirce's Theoremic/Corollarial Distinction and the Interconnections between Mathematics and Logic“ in N. Houser, D. D. Roberts, and J. Van Evra, eds.,
*Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce*. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar - 31.Cooke, Elizabeth F. (2003). “Peirce, Fallibilism, and the Science of Mathematics.”
*Philosophia Mathematica***11**: 158–175.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 32.Campos, Daniel (2007). “Peirce on the Role of Poetic Creation in Mathematical Reasoning.”
*Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society***43**: 470–489.Google Scholar - 33.Eisele, Carolyn (1971). “The mathematical foundations of Peirce's Philosophy” in
*Studies in the scientific and mathematical philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: essays by Carolyn Eisele*. The Hague/New York, Mouton. Edited by R. M. Martin.Google Scholar - 34.Hull, Kathleen (1994). “Why Hanker after Logic? Mathematical Imagination, Creativity, and Perception in Peirce's Systematic Philosophy.”
*Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society***30**: 271–296.Google Scholar - 35.Dipert, Randall R. (1994). “Peirce's Underestimated Place in the History of Logic: A Response to Quine,” in Kenneth L. Ketner, ed.,
*Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries*, New York: Fordham University Press, 32–58.Google Scholar - 36.Whately, Richard (1826).
*Elements of logic: comprising the substance of the article in the Encyclopedia Metropolitana; with additions*, &c. London, J. Mawman.Google Scholar - 37.Peirce, Charles S. and Victoria Welby (2001).
*Semiotic and significs: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby*. Elsah, IL, Arisbe Associates. Edited by Charles S. Harwick and James Cook.Google Scholar - 38.Peirce (1870) Peirce, Benjamin (1881). “Linear Associative Algebra.”
*American Journal of Mathematics***4**: 97–229. This paper is based on a memoir read before the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, 1870. It was published posthumously with notes by Charles S. Peirce.Google Scholar - 39.Seibert, Charles H. (2005). “Charles Peirce's Reading of Richard Whately's ‘Elements of Logic’.”
*History and Philosophy of Logic***26**: 1–31.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 40.Boole, George (1847).
*The mathematical analysis of logic: being an essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning*. Cambridge, England, Macmillan Barclay & Macmillan.Google Scholar - 41.Babbage, Charles and John Herschel (1813). “Preface.”
*Memoirs of the Analytical Society:*i–xxii.Google Scholar - 42.Chrystal, George (1883). “Mathematics”.
*The ninth edition, Encyclopaedia Britannica*. Vol. 15. Edinburgh, Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar - 43.Peirce, Benjamin (1881).
*Ideality in the physical sciences*. Boston, FL, Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar - 44.Peirce, Benjamin (1880). “The impossible in mathematics”, in Mrs. John T. Sargent, ed.,
*Sketches and reminiscences of the Radical Club of Chestnut St. Boston*. Boston, FL, James R. Osgood, pp. 376–379.Google Scholar - 45.Sylvester, James J. (1868). “Presidential Address to the British Association.” reproduced in
*Sylvester's mathematical papers*, vol. 2, p. 654.Google Scholar - 46.Locke, John (1690).
*An Essay Concerning Human Understanding*. London.Google Scholar - 47.Anderson, Ronald and Girish Joshi (1993). “Quaternions and the Heuristic Role of Mathematical Structures in Physics.”
*Physics Essays***6**: 308–319.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 48.Anderson, Ronald and Girish Joshi (2008), “Interpreting Mathematics in Physics: Charting the Applications of SU(2) in 20th Century Physics.”
*Chaos, Solitons & Fractals*,**36**: 397–404.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 49.Herschel, John F. W. 1831.
*Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy*. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 50.Gray, Jeremy J. (2004). “Anxiety and Abstraction in Nineteenth-Century Mathematics.”
*Science in Context***17**: 23–47.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 51.Peirce, Charles S. (1975).
*Charles Sanders Peirce: contributions to the nation*. Lubbock, TX, Texas Tech Press. Compiled and annotated by Kenneth Laine Ketner and James Edward Cook.Google Scholar - 52.Haack, Susan (1979). “Fallibilism and Necessity.”
*Synthese***41**: 37–63.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 53.Bernstein, Richard J. (1989). “Pragmatism, Pluralism and the Healing of Wounds.”
*Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association***63**: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 54.Mancosu, Paolo (1997).
*From Brouwer to Hilbert: the debate on the foundations of mathematics in the 1920s*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - 55.Giaquinto, M. (2002).
*The search for certainty: a philosophical account of foundations of mathematics*. Oxford/New York, Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 56.Thagard, Paul and Beam, Craig (2004). “Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy.”
*Metaphilosophy***35**: 504–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 57.Abrams, Jerold J. (2002). “Philosophy After the Mirror of Nature: Rorty, Dewey, and Peirce on Pragmatism and Metaphor.”
*Metaphor and Symbol***3**: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 58.Steward, Dugald (1854–1860).
*The collected works of Dugald Stewart*. Edited by Sir W. Hamilton: 11 vols., Edinburgh, T. Constable: Vols. 2–4, Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, vol. II first published 1814.Google Scholar - 59.Chihara, Charles S. (2004).
*A structural account of mathematics*. Oxford/New York, Clarendon/Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 60.Bourbaki, Nicolas (1994).
*Elements of the history of mathematics*. Berlin/New York, Springer-Ve r l ag.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 61.Cooke, Elizabeth F. (2007). “Peirce's General Theory of Inquiry and the Problem of Mathematics” (under review).Google Scholar
- 62.Whitehead, Alfred N. (1926).
*Science and the modern world*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - 63.Dewey, John (1938),
*The later works, 1925–1953*, Volume 12, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL, Southern Illinois University Press, Edited by Jo Ann Boydston.Google Scholar - 64.Campos, Daniel G. (2005).
*The Discovery of Mathematical Probability Theory: A Case Study in the Logic of Mathematical Inquiry*. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, UMI AAT 3202479.Google Scholar - 65.Hacking, Ian (1983).
*Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science*. Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - 66.Peirce, Benjamin (1855).
*A system of analytic mechanics*. Boston, FL, Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar - 67.Walsh, Alison (2000).
*Relationships Between Logic and Mathematics in the Works of Benjamin and Charles S. Peirce*, Ph.D. thesis, Middlesex University.Google Scholar - 68.Peirce, Benjamin (1853). Address of Professor Benjamin Peirce, president of the American Association for the year 1853, on retiring from the duties of president.Google Scholar
- 69.Emerson, Edward Waldo (1918).
*The early years of the Saturday club, 1855–1870*. Boston, FL/New York, Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar - 70.Goodman, Nicolas (1991). “Modernizing the Philosophy of Mathematics.”
*Synthese***88**: 119–126.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 71.van Kerkhove, Bart (2006). “Mathematical Naturalism: Origins, Guises and Prospects.”
*Foundations of Science***11**: 5–39.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 72.Searle, John R. (2006). “Minding the Brain, Review of ‘Seeing Red: A Study in Consciousness’ by Nicholas Humphrey.”
*The New York Review of Books***53**.Google Scholar - 73.Popper, Karl R. (1957). “The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory,” in S. Körner, ed.,
*Observation and Interpretation*. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar