Skip to main content

The Method of Tree-Hypersequents for Modal Propositional Logic

  • Chapter
Towards Mathematical Philosophy

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 28))

Abstract

In this paper we present a method, that we call the tree-hypersequent method, for generating contraction-free and cut-free sequent calculi for modal propositional logics. We show how this method works for the systems K, KD, K4 and KD4, by giving a sequent calculus for these systems which are normally presented in the Hilbert style, and by proving all the main results in a purely syntactical way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avron, A., ‘The method of hypersequents in the proof theory of propositional non-classical logic’, in Steinhorn, C., Strauss, J., Hodges, W., Hyland, M. (eds.), Logic: from Foundations to Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brünnler, T., ‘Deep sequent systems for modal logic’, Advances in Modal Logic AiML, 6: 107–119, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goble, L., ‘Gentzen systems for modal logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15: 455–461, 1974.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Indrzejczak, A., ‘Generalised sequent calculus for propositional modal logics’, Logica Trianguli, 1: 15–31, 1997.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kashima, R., ‘Cut-free sequent calculi for some tense logics’, Studia Logica, 53: 119–135, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsumoto, M., Ohnishi, K., ‘Gentzen method in modal calculi’, Osaka Mathematical Journal, 9 and 11: 115–120, 1959.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mints, G., ‘Indexed systems of sequents and cut-elimination’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 26: 671–696, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Negri, S., ‘Proof analysis in modal logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poggiolesi, F., ‘A cut-free simple sequent calculus for modal logic s5’, Submitted to the Review of Symbolic Logic, June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poggiolesi, F., ‘Sequent calculus for modal logic’, Logic Colloquium, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sambin, G., Valentini, S., ‘The modal logic of provability. The sequential approach’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 311–342, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Wansing, H., ‘Sequent calculi for normal modal propositional logics’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 4: 125–142, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Poggiolesi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poggiolesi, F. (2009). The Method of Tree-Hypersequents for Modal Propositional Logic. In: Makinson, D., Malinowski, J., Wansing, H. (eds) Towards Mathematical Philosophy. Trends in Logic, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9084-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics