Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research ((NTHR,volume 26))

Abstract

Social vulnerability to drought is complex and it is reflected by society’s capacity to anticipate, cope with and respond. Here we estimate these aspects of social vulnerability, evaluating the natural resource structure, the economic capacity, the human and civic resources, and aspects of agricultural innovation. These factors are components of a vulnerability index and they can be weighted appropriately in computing the final value of the index. In this chapter we present the results of the index under two valuation scenarios. For Scenario 1 all components are valued equally. For Scenario 2 the human resources component is given 50% of the weight, the economic and natural resource components are given 20% of the weight each, and the agricultural technology is given 10% of the weight. This reflects the assumption that a society with institutional capacity and coordination and mechanisms for public participation is less vulnerable to drought and that agriculture is only one of the sectors affected by drought. The vulnerability index establishes robust conclusions since the range of values across countries does not change with the assumptions under the two scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Arnell NW (1999) Climate change and global water resources, Global Environmental Change, 9(1):S31–S49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert A, Malone E (2005), Modeling vulnerability and resilience to climate change: A case study of India and Indian States. Climate Change, 72(1–2):57–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton I (1997) Vulnerability and adaptive response in the context of climate and climate change Climatic Change, 36:185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007) FAOSTAT and AQUASTAT Database Collections. In Internet: http://www.fao.org, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Last visited December 2006.

  • Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007a) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resources Management, 21(5):775–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias A, Mougou R, Moneo M (2007b) Adaptation of Mediterranean agriculture to climate change. In: Key vulnerable regions and climate change, Battaglini A (ed), European Climate Forum, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias A, Moneo M (eds.) 2005 Drought Preparedness and Mitigation in the Mediterranean: Analysis of the Organizations and Institutions. Options Méditerranénnnes, Série B, No. 51. Zaragoza: CIHEAM. ISBN: 2-85352-320-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu C, Klein RJT, Hinkel J, Kumar KSK, Klein R (2008) Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment (Submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change (2007): Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Richard A (2005) Millennium’s Hottest Decade Retains its Title, for Now, Science 307, 11 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneo M (2007) Agricultural vulnerability of drought: A comparative study in Morocco and Spain. IAMZ-CIHEAM, Zaragoza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R et al. (2000) Measuring Vulnerability: A Trial Indicator Set. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly J, Schimmelpfennig D (1999) Agricultural impact assessment, vulnerability, and the scope for adaptation Climatic Change, 43:745–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA (2005) Drought and water crisis: Science, technology and management issues. Taylor and Francis, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Malone E, Brenkert A, Schlesinger M, Meij H, Xing X (2006) Global Distributions of Vulnerability to Climate Change, Integrated Assessment Journal, 6:3, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Tol R S J (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity-moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 12:25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iglesias, A., Moneo, M., Quiroga, S. (2009). Methods for Evaluating Social Vulnerability to Drought. In: Iglesias, A., Cancelliere, A., Wilhite, D.A., Garrote, L., Cubillo, F. (eds) Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture and Water Supply Systems. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics