Skip to main content

Characterization of Char for Agricultural Use in the Soils of the Southeastern United States

  • Chapter
Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision

Char produced from the pyrolysis of biomass has potential as an agricultural amendment in low fertility soils. Much of the interest in its use as an agricultural amendment has been stimulated by research discussed in this book and the previous volumes on the role of charcoal in terra preta soils. Results from studies conducted in South American and African tropics on acidic, highly-weathered Oxisols with low organic carbon (C), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and base saturation indicate that addition of charcoal has significantly influenced nutrient cycling, soil biology, and crop productivity (Glaser et al. 2002; Lehmann and Rondon 2006; Oguntunde et al. 2004). Increased yields and biomass have been reported for various legumes (Iswaran et al. 1980; Lehmann et al. 2003; Topoliantz et al. 2005) and for corn (Lehmann and Rondon 2006; Oguntunde et al. 2004). Increased productivity may be related to available nutrients (Glaser et al. 2002; Lehmann et al. 2003; Steiner et al. 2007), or increases in pH (Topoliantz et al. 2005; Steiner et al. 2007), and CEC (Steiner et al. 2007; Liang et al. 2006), as well as changes in water relations and soil biology (Glaser et al. 2002; Steiner et al. 2004). Although most studies report increased plant productivity with charcoal addition, plant biomass decreases have been observed, particularly at high application rates (Glaser et al. 2002). These responses could be related to nitrogen immobilization through high C:N ratios and sorption of NH4 and NO3 (Lehmann and Rondon 2006).

The southeastern United States is an important agricultural area. The state of Georgia alone has approximately 4.3 million hectares of corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), and peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) in production and 9.6 million hectares of forestland largely in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) production (USDA 2002; Georgia Forestry Commission 2007). The growing interest in biofuels is increasing demands on row crop production and may also increase demand on forestlands. The Ultisols of the southeastern United States are similar to tropical Oxisols with low organic C concentrations of less than 1%, low CECs of approximately 5 cmol kg−1, and low base saturation of usually less than 30% (Perkins 1987). Char from energy production through pyrolysis may provide an opportunity to increase the productivity of southeastern soils, similar to the way charcoal functions in terra preta. However, because char characteristics vary with feedstock and pyrolysis conditions (Harris et al. 2006; Antal and Gronli 2003), a better understanding of the influence of these factors on char characteristics and the effect of different chars on soil processes in the southeastern United States is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alaya MN, Girgi BS, Mourad WE (2000) Activated carbon from some agricultural wastes under action of one-step steam pyrolysis. Journal of Porous Materials 7:509–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antal MJ, Gronli M (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 42:1619–1640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asada T, Ishihara S, Yamame T, Toba A, Yamada A, Oikawa K (2002) Science of bamboo charcoal: Study on carbonizing temperature of bamboo charcoal and removal capability of harmful gases. Journal of Health Science 48(6):473–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal RC, Donnet J, Stoeckli F (1988) Active Carbon. Marcel Dekker. New York, p. 482

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkauskas J (2002) Functional groups on the surface of activated carbons. Part A. Investigation by means of proton affinity distribution. Chemine Technologia, 24(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benaddi H, Bandosz TJ, Jagiello J, Schwarz JA, Rouzaud JN, Legras D, Beguin F (2000) Surface functionality and porosity of activated carbons obtained from chemical activation of wood. Carbon 38(5):669–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm HP (1994) Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon 32(5):759–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin J, Morris L, Lee D, Adolphson R, Harris K, Das KC (2006) Effect of pyrolysis char on corn growth and loamy sand soil characteristics. Abstracts of American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America International Annual Meetings. Nov. 12–16, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Forestry Commission (2007) Georgia Facts.http://www.gfagrow.org/facts.asp

  • Giles CH, Macewan TH, Nakhwa SN, Smith D (1960) Studies in adsorption isotherms and its use in diagnosis of adsorption mechanisms and in measurements of specific surface areas of solids. Journal of the Chemical Society, London 3973–3993

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal — a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregova K, Petrov N, Eser S (1994) Adsorption properties and microstructure of activate carbons produced from agricultural by-products by steam pyrolysis. Carbon 32(4):693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Rockstraw DA (2007) Physicochemical properties of carbons prepared from pecan shell by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresource Technology 98(8):1513–1521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris K, Gaskin JW, Sonon LS, Das KC (2006) Characterization of pyrolysis char for use as an agricultural soil amendment. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America International Annual Meetings. Nov. 12–16, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Iswaran V, Jauhri KS, Sen A (1980) Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong, soybean and pea. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 12:191–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyobe T, Asada T, Kawata K, Oikawa K (2004) Comparison of removal efficiencies for ammonia and amine gases between woody charcoal and activated carbon. Journal of Health Science 50(2):148–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. In: Uphoff N, Ball AS, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Lang M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Theis J (eds) Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. CRC Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Pereira da Silva Jr J, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leachng in an archeological Ahtrosol and a Ferrasol of the Central Amazon basin: Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil 249:343–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O'Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Peterson J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity on soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:1719–1730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima I, Marshall WE (2005) Adsorption of selected environmentally important metals by poultry manure-based granular activated carbons. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 80:1054–1061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBride MB (1994) Environmental Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 406

    Google Scholar 

  • Oguntunde PG, Fosu M, Ajayi AE, van de Giesen N (2004) Effects of charcoal production on maize yields, chemical properties and texture of soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39:295–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins HF (1987) Characterization Data for Selected Georgia Soils. The Georgia Agricultural Experiments Stations, College of Agriculture, The University of Georgia. Athens, Special Publication 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G (1989) The Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Zech W (2004) Microbial response to charcoal amendments of highly weathered soils and Amazonian Dark Earths in Central Amazonia — preliminary results. In: Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and Time. Springer, New York, pp. 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, Vasconcelos de Macedo JL, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant and Soil 291(1–2):275–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckli F, Guillot A, Slasli AM (2004) Specific and non-specific interactions between ammonia and activated carbons. Carbon 42(8–9):1619–1624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strelko V, Malik DJ, Streat M (2002) Characterisation of the surface of oxidized carbon adsorbents. Carbon 40(1):95–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL et al. (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series no. 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 1201–1229

    Google Scholar 

  • Topoliantz S, Ponge J-F, Ballof S (2005) Manioc peel and charcoal: A potential organic amendment for sustainable soil fertility in the tropics. Biology and Fertility of Soils 41:15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2002) Census of Agriculture.http://www.nass.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Quick_Stats/ (accessed 29 May 2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JW Gaskin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaskin, J., Das, K., Tassistro, A., Sonon, L., Harris, K., Hawkins, B. (2009). Characterization of Char for Agricultural Use in the Soils of the Southeastern United States. In: Woods, W.I., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A., Rebellato, L. (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9031-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics