Ethical Leadership in an Age of Evaluation: Implications for Whole School Wellbeing

Part of the International Handbooks of Religion and Education book series (IHRE, volume 3)

Abstract

The evaluation and inspection of many public services, including education, has become increasingly common in most countries in the developed world (McNamara & O’Hara, 2004; MacBeath & McGlynn, 2002). There are various reasons why this may be the case. It can be argued that it is, on the one hand, part of the movement towards low trust policies derived from the ideology of neo-liberalism which seeks to apply the values of the market to the public sector. On the other hand, it can be argued that increased evaluation is a necessary and defensible component of democratic accountability, responsibility and transparency (O’Neill, 2002). The research reported here sets out to explore the idea of a personal vision or core of ethics as being central to educational leadership, through in-depth interviews with a number of school leaders. The chapter begins by briefly placing educational leadership in the modern context, characterised by the paradox of apparently greater decentralisation of responsibility to schools being in fact coupled with a further centralisation of actual power and greatly increased surveillance of performance (Neave, 1998). Relevant developments internationally, and then specifically in the context of Ireland, are described. It is suggested that in Ireland the modern educational context may indeed be creating difficult ethical and moral dilemmas for leaders to face. To see if this is so in practice, five in-depth interviews with school principals are reported. The evidence arising from these interviews indicates that school leaders do feel guided by a strong moral or ethical compass.

Keywords

Migration Europe Straw Sine Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bottery, M. (2004). The challenges of educational leadership. London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bottery, M. (2007). Reports from the front line, English head teachers’ work in an era of practice centralisation. Evaluation, 35(1), 89–110.Google Scholar
  4. Boyle, R. (1997, January–March). Civil service reform in the Republic of Ireland. Public Money and Management, 17, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, R. (2002). A two-tiered approach: Evaluation practice in the Republic of Ireland. In J. E. Furubo, R. C. Rist, & R. Sandahl (Eds.), International atlas of evaluation (pp. 261–272). Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Briggs, A. R. J. (2007). The Oz effect: An examination of middle management roles and perceptions of professionalism in an Australian TAFF. Management in Education, 21(3), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, C., Harris, A., Hayfield, M., Tolley, H. & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Jong, T., & Kerr-Roubicek, H. (2007). Towards a whole school approach to pastoral care: A proposed framework of principles and practices. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 17(1). 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Education and Science, Ireland. (1999). Whole school evaluation. Dublin: DES.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Education and Science, Ireland. (2003a). Looking at our school, an aid to self evaluation in primary schools. Dublin: DES.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Education and Science, Ireland. (2003b). Looking at our school, an aid to self evaluation in second level schools. Dublin: DES.Google Scholar
  12. Dunphy, M. (2007, October 8). OECD project report: Improving school leadership in Ireland. Paper presented to a meeting of the Society for Management in Education in Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
  13. Elliott, J. (2004). Making evidence-based practice educational. In MG. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 164–186). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elmore, R. F., & Fuhrman, S. H. (2001). Research finds the false assumption of accountability. Educational Digest, 67, 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fullan, M. (2004). The moral imperatives of school leadership. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Gibton, D. (2004). Legalised leadership. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Giddins, A. (2004). Sociology (4th ed.). London: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Government of Ireland. (1998). Education act. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  20. Gold, A., Evans, J., Earley, P., Halpin, D., & Collarbone, P. (2003). Principled principals, values driven leadership: Evidence from ten case studies of “outstanding” school leadership. Educational Management and Adminstration, 31(2), 127–138.Google Scholar
  21. Hansson, F. (2006). Organizational use of evaluations: Governance and control in research evaluation. Evaluation, 12(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  23. Hoyle, E., & Wallace, M. (2007). Educational reform, an ironic perspective. Evaluation, 35(1), 9–25.Google Scholar
  24. Irish Times. (2007, October 5). Department published more than 1,000 reports on schools. Irish Times, 11.Google Scholar
  25. Irish Times. (2007, October 1). Principals to report on “underperforming” teachers. Irish Times, 8.Google Scholar
  26. Kilpatrick, S., Falk, I., & Johns, S. (2002, June 16–19). Leadership for dynamic learning communities. Refereed conference paper presented at Lifelong Learning: Building Learning Communities Through Education. 2nd International Conference, Yeppoon, Central Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  27. MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for school self-evaluation. London: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. MacBeath, J. (2006). New relationships for old—Inspection and self evaluation in England and Hong Kong. International Studies in Educational Administration, 34(2), 2–18.Google Scholar
  29. MacBeath, J., & McGlynn, A. (2002). Self-evaluation, What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar
  30. McNamara, G., & Kenny, A. (2006, October). Quality evaluation: Policy, theory and practice in the education sector. Paper presented to the Joint International Conference of the European Evaluation Society and the UK Evaluation Society, London.Google Scholar
  31. McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2004). Trusting the teacher: Evaluating educational innovation. Evaluation, 10(4), 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2005). Internal review and self-evaluation: The chosen route to school improvement in Ireland. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2006). Workable compromise or pointless exercise? School-based evaluation in the Irish context. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 34(4), 546–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2008). Trusting schools and teachers: Developing educational professionalism through self-evaluation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Meuret, D., & Morlaix, S. (2003). Conditions of success of a school’s self-evaluation: Some lessons of a European experience. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moos, L. (2003). Educational leadership: Understanding and developing practice. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.Google Scholar
  38. Nevo, D. (2002). School-based evaluation: An international perspective. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neill, N. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Trust.Google Scholar
  40. Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
  41. Peters, R. S. (1973). Authority, responsibility and education. London: Allyn and Unwin.Google Scholar
  42. Pring, R. (2004). Conclusion: Evidence-based policy and practice. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 201–213). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Roche, K. (1999). Moral and ethical dilemmas in Catholic school settings. In P. Begley (Ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 255–272). Albany, New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  44. Simons, H. (2002). School self-evaluation in a democracy. In D. Nevo (Ed.), School-based evaluation: An international perspective (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Slattery, P. (2003). Hermeneutics, subjectivity and aesthetics: Internationalising the interpretative process in US curriculum research. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 651–666). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Sugrue, C. (1999). Primary principals’ perspectives on whole school evaluation. Irish Journal of Education, 10(2), 15–31.Google Scholar
  47. Thrupp, M., & Willmott, R. (2003). Education management in managerialist times. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, L., & Craig, D. (2004). Tiptoe through the plateaus: Personal reflections on interviews with Andy Hargreaves and Molly Quinn. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 1(1), 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woods, G. (2007). “The ‘bigger feeling’, the importance of spiritual experience in educational leadership. Evaluation, 35(1), 135–155.Google Scholar
  50. Wright, N. (2003). Principled bastard leadership? A rejoinder to Gold, Evans, Earley, Halpin and Collarbone. Educational Management and Administration, 29(3), 139–143.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education StudiesDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations