Advertisement

Metaphors for Wellbeing: Enhancing Students’ Learning and Teaching Perceptions Within a Pre-service Education Course

  • Mary Nuttall
Part of the International Handbooks of Religion and Education book series (IHRE, volume 3)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on metaphors for wellbeing that were developed by a number of pre-service teachers (students) within prescribed education units undertaken during their year-long Graduate Diploma in Education (GDE) Course. In light of readings, discussions and reflective activities, students explored attributes and potential of the metaphor for defining a sense of self and sustaining personal wellbeing during their course. Students used this valuable background knowledge and understanding of “self” to create personal metaphors that represented themselves on a “learning journey” undertaken within their prescribed education units. Students’ metaphors became sources of personal wellbeing and sound bases for enhancing their learning and teaching perspectives within the framework of their course.

Keywords

Student Teacher Emotional Intelligence Curriculum Development Personal Wellbeing Tour Guide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, R. (2005). Empathic intelligence: teaching, learning, relating. Tasmania: UNSW PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-On, R., & Parker, J. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of emotional intelligence. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bodine, R., & Crawford, D. (1999). Developing emotional intelligence. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bouma, G. (2004). The research process (5th ed.). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bullough, R. with Stokes, D. (1994). Analyzing personal teaching metaphors in preservice teacher education as a means for encouraging professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, R. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest, N.S.W.: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Caulley, D. (1992). Notes on the basic characteristics of postpositivist interpretive inquiry. Unpublished manuscript, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. de Souza, M. (2005). Teaching for connectedness. In P. Haywood et al. (Eds.), Towards re-enchantment: education, imagination and the getting of wisdom (pp. 113–126). Flaxton, QU: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
  10. Egan, K. (1978). What is curriculum? Curriculum Inquiry, 8(1), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21 st century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Kessler, R. (2000). The soul of education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  15. Killen, R. (2007). Effective teaching strategies: lessons from research and practice (4th ed.). Tuggerah, N.S.W.: Social Science Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lazear, D. (2003). Eight ways of teaching: the artistry of teaching with multiple intelligences (4th ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  17. Leavy, A., McSorley, F., & Bote, L. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveals about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23 (7), 1217–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martinez, M., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McInerney, D., & McInerney, V. (2006). Educational psychology: constructing learning. (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, J. (2000). Education and the soul: towards a spiritual curriculum. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Neuman, L. (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  22. Nuttall, M. P. (2000). National curriculum developments (1988–1995) in relation to curriculum change in selected Catholic primary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. La Trobe University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  23. Nuttall, M. P. (2003). Curriculum development: from connoisseurship, through collaboration, to control. Curriculum and Teaching, 18(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuttall, M. P. (2005). Curriculum as conversation: the teachers’ voices. In P. Haywood et al. (Eds.), Towards re-enchantment: education, imagination and the getting of wisdom (pp. 145–152). Flaxton, QU: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
  25. Nuttall, M. P. (2006), Soulful learning: a vital component of curriculum development. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson, & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions in education (pp. 1343–1359). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Pinar, W. (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  28. Richard, L., & Morse, J. (2007). User’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Subramaniam, K. (2000). Images of teaching with computer technology: a metaphorical perspective. Research paper: Moving beyond the crossroads: teachers as agents for change. Connecting at the crossroads, NECC, 2000: National Educational Computing Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA, June 26–28, 2000.Google Scholar
  30. Stofflett, R. (1996). Metaphor development by secondary teachers enrolled in graduate teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 577–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zirkel, S. (2000). Social intelligence: the development and maintenance of purposive behaviour. In R. Barron & J. Parker. (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2000). Spiritual intelligence the ultimate intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Nuttall
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationAustralian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations