Comparative studies and comparative research settings have contributed significantly to the theoretical development of higher education research. Burton Clark developed his influential theoretical device after having studied systems other than US higher education (Clark 1983). ‘Clark's triangle’ is, however, only one of the intellectual devices developed in comparative research. Equally interesting is the concept ‘fields of social action’ as introduced by Bleiklie, Hostaker and Vabo (2000), which was developed, again, in a comparative research setting. Comparative studies have also challenged us to define different categories of higher education traditions and systems, thus providing useful intellectual devices for placing one's national higher education system in a larger context (Gellert 1993; Teichler 1988). Historical comparative studies have, in turn, increased our understanding of various traditions and origins of Western universities (e.g. Rashdall 1895; Cobban 1988).
Comparative studies have been especially popular as a research strategy in European Higher education studies. According to Ulrich Teichler (1996), one of the reasons for this is that the number of higher education researchers is quite small in most individual European states. This has created a need for a broader basis of thought. In addition, new political (and academic) interests in monitoring European developments in a comparative research setting have emerged, because of the pressures to harmonise and standardise the European higher education area through the Bologna process over the last years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altbach, P.G. “Higher Education: Comparative Studies.” In Husen, T. and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds).International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol 4. Oxford: Pergamon, 1985, 2194–2196.
Altbach, P.G.Comparative Higher Education. Knowledge, the University, and Development.Contemporary Studies in Social and Policy Issues in Education: The David C. Anchin Series. Alex Publishing Corporation: Greenwich, CT, USA, 1998.
Becher, T. and M. Kogan.Process and Structure in Higher Education. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, 1992.
Bereday, G.Z.F. “Some Discussion of the Methods in Comparative Education.”Comparative Education Review1.1 (1957): 13–15.
Bereday, G.Z.F.Comparative Method in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
Bleiklie, I., R. Hostaker and A. Vabo.Policy and Practice in Higher Education. Reforming Norwegian Universities. Higher Education Policy Series 49. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.
Brickman, W.G. “C.I.E.S.: An Historical Analysis”Comparative Education Review21.2–3 (1977): 396–404.
Bourdieu, P.Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.
Byun, K. “OECD guk-ga-yi dae-hak governance gu-jo yu-hyung-hwa-wa si-sa-jum [A typology of institutional governance structures in higher education and its implication]”.The Journal of Educational Administration25.2 (2007): 279–303.
Carnoy, M. “Rethinking the Comparative — and the International.”Comparative Education Review50.4 (2006): 551–570.
Gellert, C. (ed.).Higher Education in Europe. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 1993.
Clark, B.R.The Higher Education System. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1983.
Creswell, J.W.Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,1994.
Cummings, W. “The Context for the Changing Academic Profession: A Survey of International Indicators”. A Paper presented inThe International Conference on the Changing Academic Profession Project: The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative and Quantitative Perspectives. Hiroshima, January 28–29, 2008.
Goedegebuure, L. and F. van Vught. “Comparative Higher Education Studies: The Perspective from the Policy Science.”Higher Education32.4 (1996): 371–394.
Cobban, A.The Medieval English Universities: Oxford and Cambridge to c. 1500. Berkeley, CA/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1988.
Henkel, M.Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.
Holmes, B. “Paradigm Shifts in Comparative Education.”Comparative Education Review28.4 (1984): 584–604.
Kogan, M. “Comparing Higher Education Systems.”Higher Education21.2–3 (1996): 370–395.
Kogan, M., M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie, and M. Henkel.Transforming Higher Education. A Comparative Study. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.
Oyen, E.Comparative Methodology, Theory and Practice in International Social Research. London: Sage, 1990.
Page, E.C. “Comparative Public Administration: The State of the Art.”Public Administration73.1 (1995).
Paulston, R.G. “Social and Educational Change: Conceptual Frameworks.”Comparative Education Review21.2 (1977): 370–395.
Peters, M.A.Knowledge Economy, Development and the Future of Higher Education. Rotterdam & Taipei: Sense Publishers, 2007.
Rossello, P. “Comparative Education as an Instrument of Planning.”Comparative Education Review4.1 (1960): 3–12.
Rashdall, H.The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages(3 vols.) (2nd ed.). Edited by Powicke, F.M. and A.B. Emden (1936). Oxford: Clarendron, 1895.
Robson, C.Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
Rothblatt, S. and B. Wittrock. “Introduction: Universities and 'Higher Education.” In Rothblatt, S. and B. Wittrock (eds).The European and American University Since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 1–5.
Rust, V.D., A. Soumare, O. Pescador, and M. Shibuya. “Research Strategies in Comparative Education.”Comparative Education Review43.1 (1999): 86–109.
Schneider, F. “Internationale Pädagogik, Auslands Pädagogik, Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft: Geschichte, Wese, Methoden, Aufgabe und Ergebnisse.”Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft1 (1931).
Schwartzman, S. “The Quest for University Research: Policies and Research Organization in Latin America.” In Wittrock, B. and A. Elzinga (eds).The University Research System. London: Almquist and Wiksell, 1985.
Slaughter, S. “Problems in Comparative Higher Education: Political Economy, Political Sociology and Postmodernism.”Higher Education41.4 (2001): 389–412.
Teichler, U.Changing Patterns of the Higher Education System: The Experience of Three Decades. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 1988.
Teichler, U. “Comparative Higher Education: Potentials and Limits.”Higher Education32.4 (1996): 431–465.
Tierney, W.G. “The Autonomy of Knowledge and the Decline of the Subject: Postmodernism and the Reformulation of the University.”Higher Education41.4 (2001): 353–372.
Toulmin, S.Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Välimaa, J. “Private and Public Intellectuals in Finland”. In Tierney, W.G. and K. Kempner (eds).The Social Role of Higher Education: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Garland Press, 1996, 185–207.
Välimaa, J. “The Changing Nature of Academic Employment in Finnish Higher Education.” In Enders, J. (ed.).Academic Staff in Europe: Changing Contexts and Conditions. London: GreenwoodPress, 2001, 67–91.
Välimaa, J. “Three Rounds of Evaluation and the Idea of Accreditation in Finnish Higher Education.” In Schawarz, S. and D.F. Westerheijden (eds).Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004a, 101–125.
Välimaa, J. The Academic Workplace. Country Report Finland. In Enders, J. and E. de Weert (eds).The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe. GEW: Materialen und Dokumenten, 107. Darmstadt, 2004b, 115–140.
Välimaa, J. and M. Mollis. “The Social Functions of Evaluation in Argentine and Finnish Higher Education.”Higher Education in Europexxix (2004): 67–86.
Välimaa, J. and D.F. Westerheijden. “Two Discourses: Researchers and Policy-making in Higher Education.”Higher Education29.4 (1995): 385–403.
Wittrock, B. “The Modern University: The Three Transformations.” In Rothblatt, S. and B. Wittrock (eds).The European and American University Since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 303–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
VÄlimaa, J. (2008). On Comparative Research In Higher Education. In: Amaral, A., Bleiklie, I., Musselin, C. (eds) From Governance to Identity. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8994-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8994-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8993-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8994-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)