Regenerative Medicine after Humanism: Puzzles Regarding the use of Embryonic Stem Cells, Germ-Line Genetic Engineering, and the Immanent Pursuit of Human Flourishing

  • H. Tristram Engelhardt
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 102)


This paper provides a geography ofmoral andmetaphysical controversy. It offers a map of cardinal cultural conflicts, an overview of the colliding understandings of reality that shape the bioethical debates nesting regenerative medicine, in particular those associated with interferences in early human embryonic life and with human germ-line genetic engineering. Regenerative medicine promises to ameliorate, if not cure, a wide range of human injuries, disabilities, and diseases. Human embryonic stem cells, including stemcells produced from human cloning, promise areas of important new research as well as avenues for breakthrough treatments.Human genetic engineering may also transform the responses of cells, making regeneration and repair more likely.


Regenerative Medicine Human Embryonic Stem Cell Stem Cell Research Moral Sentiment Thought Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alora, A.T. & Lumitao, J.M. (Eds.) (2001). Beyond a Western Bioethics: Voices from the Developing World, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, M. (1987). At the Origins of Modern Atheism, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  3. Council of Europe (April 2000). ‘Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo, 4.IV.1997),’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25.Google Scholar
  4. Dupré, L. (1993). Passage to Modernity. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  5. Eich, T. (2003). ‘Muslim Voices on Cloning,’ ISIM Newsletter, 12, 38–39.Google Scholar
  6. Eichendorff, J.F. von (1958).’Über die Folgen von der Aufhebung der Landeshoheit der Bischöfe und der Klöster in Deutschland,’ in Werke und Schriften, Vol. 4 (pp. 1133–1184), Cotta’sche, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  7. Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (1991). Bioethics and Secular Humanism: A Search for a Common Morality, Trinity Press International, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  8. Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (1996). The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (2000). The Foundations of Christian Bioethics, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (2002). ‘The Ordination of Bioethicists as Secular Moral Experts,’ Social Philosophy & Policy, 19, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewart, W.R. & Winikoff, B. (1998). ‘Toward Safe and Effective Medical Abortion,’ Science, 281, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, R. (2002). ‘Reconstructionist Confucianism and Health Care: An Asian Moral Account of Health Care Resource Allocation,’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27, 675–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Fleck, L. (1935). Entstehung und Entwicklung Einer Wissenschaftlichen, Benno Schwabe, Tatsache, Basel.Google Scholar
  15. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, T.J. Trenn and R.K. Merton, (Eds.), trans. F. Bradley and T. J. Trenn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Gay, P. (1995). The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, J. (1998). Clones, Genes, and Immortality, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hegel, G.W.F. (1948). Early Theological Writings, trans. T. M. Knox, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  19. Hegel, G.W.F. (1964). The Phenomenology of Mind, 2nd Edition, trans. J.B. Baillie, George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  20. Hegel, G.W.F. (1968). Glauben und Wissen, in Hartmut Buchner and Otto Pöggeler (Eds.), Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 4 (p. 414), Meiner, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  21. Hegel, G.W.F. (1971). Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind, trans. W. Wallace, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Hegel, G.W.F. (1977). Faith & Knowledge, trans. W. Cerf and H.S. Harris, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  23. Hierotheos (1998). The Mind of the Orthodox Church, trans. E. Williams, Birth of the Theotokos Monastery, Levadia, Greece.Google Scholar
  24. Hofmann, H.H. (Ed.) (1976). ’Der Reichsdeputationshauptschluss,’ in Quellen zum Verfassungsorganismus des heiligen römischen Reiches deutscher Nation (pp. 329–358), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
  25. Hoshino, K. (Ed.) (1997). Japanese and Western Bioethics: Studies in Moral Diversity, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  26. Hunter, J.D. (1991). Culture Wars, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Huntington, S.P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Touchstone, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. (1962, 1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Laertius, D. (2000). Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Vol. 2, trans. R. D. Hicks, Harvard University Press, Cambridge..Google Scholar
  30. Lyotard, J-F. (1986). The Postmodern Condition, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  31. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  32. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1997). Cloning Human Beings, RAND, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  33. President’s Council on Bioethics (2002). Human Cloning and Human Dignity, U.S. Government, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. President’s Council on Bioethics (2003). Beyond Therapy, Dana Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. President’s Council on Bioethics (2004). Monitoring Stem Cell Research, President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Qiu, R-Z. (Ed.) (2004). Bioethics: Asian Perspectives, A Quest for Moral Diversity, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  37. Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. St. Basil the Great. (1995). ‘The First Canonical Epistle of our Holy Father Basil,’ in P. Schaff and H. Wace (Eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Singer, P. (1990). Animal Liberation, Avon Books, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Steigmann-Gall, R. (2003). The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919–1945, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Vovelle, M. (1991). The Revolution Against the Church, trans. Alan José, Ohio State University Press, Columbus.Google Scholar
  43. Vattimo, G. (1991). The End of Modernity, trans. J.R. Snyder, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  44. Walters, L. (2004). ‘Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: An Intercultural Perspective,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 14, 21–22, 31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Tristram Engelhardt
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Rice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations