Abstract
If we step back and examine this volume as a whole, we see that all of the authors have attempted to provide an overview of some of the different worldviews, which have given rise to the immense controversy surrounding the use of human embryonic stem cells in research. In addition, some have also tried to offer or defend a framework that they hope will give us more substantive guidance regarding these issues (namely, Fan and Yu, McKenny, and Song). However, only Brenda Almond, in “Using and Misusing Embryos, the Ethical Debates,” has tried to answer the question of whether it is permissible to use embryos for stem-cell research by appealing to what she seems to think are moral intuitions that all informed, rational beings are likely to share, while trying to avoid many of the problems that other theories of moral status encounter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almond, B. (2008). ‘Using Embryos for Research: The Ethical Debate,’ in King-Tak Ip (Ed.), The Bioethics of Regenerative Medicine, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Munthie, C. (2001). ‘Divisibility and the Moral Status of Embryos,’ Bioethics, 15, 382–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ho, J., Merriam, G. (2009). Virtue In Vitro: Virtue Ethics as an Alternative to Questions of Moral Status. In: IP, KT. (eds) The Bioethics of Regenerative Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 102. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8967-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8967-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8966-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8967-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)