Skip to main content

Integrating Analytical and Participatory Techniques for Planning the Sustainable Use of Land Resources and Landscapes

  • Chapter
Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 95))

Planning the sustainable use of land resources and landscapes must be a process in which stakeholders and the public work together to establish common guidelines for understanding the options of, and the implications for, future land uses. Key aspects of this process are the establishment of meaningful knowledge bases and tools, and methodologies based on the enhanced involvement of stakeholders in making decisions, and their subsequent implementation. The gradation of power or control in public participation proposed by Arnstein (1969), extending from ‘citizen control’ to ‘manipulation’, provides a conceptual basis for considering the evolution in political thinking about participation in areas such landscape planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball J. (2002) Towards a methodology for mapping regions for sustainability using PPGIS, Progress in Planning, 58: 81-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, J., Capanni, N. and Watt, S. (2008) Virtual reality for mutual understanding in landscape planning, International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2). www.waset.org/ijss/v2/v2-2-12.pdf.

  • Bishop I.D. (2007) Developments in public participation and collaborative environmental decision-making, In Lovett, A. and Appleton, K. (eds.) GIS for Environmental Decision-Making, Innovations in GIS, CRC Press, pp. 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E.S. (2005) Intraregional analysis of land-use change in the Amazon, In Moran, E.F. and Ostrom, E. (eds.) Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human-Environment Interactions in Forest Ecosystems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E.S. (2006) Landscapes of the past, footprints of the future: historical ecology and the analysis of land use change in the Amazon, In Balée, W. and Erikson, C. (eds.) Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands, Columbia University Press, NY, pp. 365–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E.S. (2008) The Amazonian Caboclo and the Açaí palm: Forest Farmers in the Global Market. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press. 403 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E.S. and Siquiera, A.D. (1997) From extractivists to forest farmers: changing concepts of Caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary, Research in Economic Anthropology, 18: 234–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucek, B. and Moran, E.F. (2004) Inferring the behavior of households from remotely sensed changes in land cover: current methods and future directions, In Goodchild, M.F. and Janelle, D.G. (eds.) Spatially Integrated Social Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M. (2005) Studying the culture of agriculture: the uphill battle for social research in CGIAR, Culture and Agriculture, 27(2): 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and Levinthal, M. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2003) European Landscape Convention, Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Florence, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005) European Commission's review of progress towards the delivery of the Sixth Environmental Action Programme, www.ec.europa.eu/environment/newprg/.

  • European Union (1998a) Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament on a Forestry Strategy for European Union, COM(1998)649, 03/11/1998, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (1998b) Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decisionmaking and Access to Justice on Environmental Matters, Aarhus, 25 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2001) Sixth Environmental Action Programme, COM (2001)31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist H.J. and Lambin E.F. (2001) What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on sub-national case study evidence, LUCC Report Series, no. 4, LUCC International Project Office, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, Louvain-la-Neuve. www.geo.ucl.ac.be/LUCC/pdf/LUCC%20Report%20%20Screen.pdf.

  • Green, G.M., Schweik, C.M. and Randolph, J.C. (2005) Linking disciplines across space and time: useful concepts and approaches for land-cover change studies, In Moran, E.F. and Ostrom, E. (eds.) Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human-Environment Interactions in Forest Ecosystems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Mausel, P. and Moran, E.F. (2002) Linking Amazonian secondary succession forest growth to soil properties, Land Degradation and Development, 13: 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay Institute (2007) Putting People in the Planning Picture. www.macaulay.ac.uk/videos/vlt/index.php.

  • McConnell, W.J. and Keys, E. (2005) Meta-analysis of agricultural change, In Moran, E.F. and Ostrom, E. (eds.) Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human-Environment Interactions in Forest Ecosystems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelt, J.D. (1997) An interdisciplinary approach to integrate a range of agro-landscape values as proposed by representatives of various disciplines, Agricultural Ecosystem Environment, 63: 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being a Framework for Assessment, Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Morrice, J., Anderson, L., Durozard, E., Fidalgo, B., Fry, G., Gaspar, J., Gibon, A., Hassan, R., Hislop, M., Horne, P., Huet, B., Ladet, S., Lange, E., Leandro, N., Messager, P., Mottet, A., Nijnik, M., Ode, A., Pascoa, F., Pinto, L., Quine, C., Schroth, O., Schwarz, G., Shepherd, N., Tveit, M., Vitry, A., Watts, K. and Wissen, U. (2005) Visualization Tools for Public Participation in the Management of Landscape Change, Final Report for the European Commission, VisuLands, Macaulay Institute, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. and Ostrom E. (2005) Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human-Environment Interactions in Forest Ecosystems, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E.F., Brondízio, E.S. and Van Wey L.K. (2005) Population and environment in Amazônia: landscape and household dynamics, In Entwisle B. and Stern, P.C. (eds.) Population, Land Use and the Environment, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, B., Birr-Pedersen, K. and Schou, J.S. (2004) Combined ecological and economic modelling in agricultural land use scenarios, Ecological Modelling, 174: 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijnik, M., Mather, A. and Hill, G. (2005) From multifunctional forestry toward post-productivism? The Multifunctional Role of Forests: Policies, Methods and Case Studies, University of Padova, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijnik, M. and Mather, A. (2007) Analysing institutions and public perspectives to identify the future of British forests, In Reynolds, K.M. (ed.) Sustainable Forestry: From Monitoring and Modelling to Knowledge Management and Policy Science, CABI publishers, pp.171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijnik, M. and Mather, A. (2008) Analysing public preferences for woodland development in rural landscapes in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86: 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijnik, M., Zahvoyska, L., Nijnik, A. and Ode, A. (2008) Public evaluation of landscape content and change. Land Use Policy, 26: 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orland, B., Budthimedhee, K. and Uusitalo, J. (2001) Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(14): 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potschin, M.B. and Haines-Young, R.H. (2003) Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from Southern Germany, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63: 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skole, D. and Tucker, C.J. (1993) Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988, Science, 260: 1905–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive (2002) Scottish Planning Policy: The Planning System. www.scotland.gov.uk/library/planning/spp1.pdf.

  • Scottish Executive (2006) Learning for Our Future: Scotland's First Action Plan for the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive (2007) Planning Advice Note 81: Community Engagement “Planning with People”, Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S.R.J. (2005) Participatory decision support for sustainable forest management: a framework for planning with local communities at the landscape level, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33(7): 1515–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) International Institutional Arrangements, In Agenda 21 - A Programme of Action for Global Action in all Areas of Sustainable Development, The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. www.habitat.ing.org.

  • United Nations (2002) World Summit on Sustainable Development: Plan of Implementation, United Nations, Johannesburg. www.johannesburg summit.org/html/documents/summitdocs/2309_planfinal.htm.

  • United Nations (2005) United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. www.portal.unesco.org/education/.

  • Van Asselt, M.B.A., Mellors, J., Rijkens-Klomp, N., Greeuw, S.C.H., Molendijk, K.G.P., Beers, P.J. and van Notten, P. (2001) Building Blocks for Participation in Integrated Assessment: A Review of Participatory Methods, International Centre for Integrated Studies (ICIS), Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, N., Bahati, J., Unruh, J., Green, G., Banana, A., Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. and Sweeney, S. (2006a) Integrating remote sensing data and rapid appraisals for land-cover change analyses in Uganda, Land Degradation and Development, 17: 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, N., Banana, A., Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. and Batí, J. (2006b) Understanding the stability of forest reserve boundaries in the West Mengo Region of Uganda, Ecology and Society, 11(1): 38. [online] URL: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art38.

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future, (Brundtland Report), Report of United Nations Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organisation (2001) Ministerial Declaration Doha 2001, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, World Trade Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  • Hunsberger, C. and Kenyon, W. (2008) Action planning to improve issues of effectiveness, representation and scale in public participation, Journal of Public Deliberation, 4(1), Article No 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, A., Appleton, K and Jones, A (in press) GIS-Based Landscape Visualization: The State of the Art, In Mount, N., Aplin, P., Priestnall, G. and Harvey, G. (eds.) Innovations in GIS 13, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. and Ostrom, E. (2005) Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human-Environment Interactions in Forest Ecosystems, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Morris, J., Coleby, A. (in press) The provision of visualization tools for engaging public and professional audiences, In Bishop, I. and Lange, E. (ed.) Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning, Taylor and Francis, Horne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijnik, M., Zahvoyska, L. and Ode, A. (in press) Public evaluation of landscape content and change: several examples from Europe, Land Use Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., Sherlock, K. and Carter, C. (2004) Practical approaches to participation, SERP Policy Brief No.1., Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, D., Vogt, N., Nijnik, M., Brondizio, E., Fiorini, S. (2009). Integrating Analytical and Participatory Techniques for Planning the Sustainable Use of Land Resources and Landscapes. In: Geertman, S., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods. The GeoJournal Library, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics