Advertisement

Medicus Curat, Natura Sanat in Homeopathy

  • Claudia Witt
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 44)

In his Organon of Medicine 1 the founder of homeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann, writes that it is ‘the physician's highest and only mission […] to restore the sick to health, to cure, as it is termed’ (§1). ‘The highest ideal of cure’, Hahnemann adds, ‘is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration of the health, or removal and annihilation of the disease in its whole extent, in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way, on easily comprehensible principles’ (§2). At first glance, the fact that Hahnemann emphasizes here the physician's role in healing patients would seem to contradict the widely held naturopathic notion that ‘the physician treats, nature heals’, or ‘medicus curat, natura sanat’.

A closer look at Hahnemann's writings, however, reveals that this is not the case. Hahnemann clearly also subscribed to the idea that ‘nature’ plays an important, if not essential, role in the healing process. In the Pure Materia Medica Hahnemann writes ‘that nature hides within her cornucopia of medicinal substances an abundance of power that is almost unlimited if it is properly revealed and elaborated’.

Keywords

Allergic Rhinitis Conventional Medicine Vital Force Medicinal Substance Homeopathic Remedy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hahnemann S. (1997) Organon of Medicine. http://www.homeopathyhome.com/reference/ organon/organon.html [5th Edition translated by Dudgeon, 6th Edition translated by Boericke]. Web Version Homeopathy Home. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
  2. 2.
    Hahnemann S. (2001) Wie können kleine Gaben so sehr verdünnter Arznei, wie die Homöopathie sie vorschreibt, noch Kraft, noch große Kraft haben? In: Schmidt J, Kaiser D, editors. Gesammelte kleine Schriften. Heidelberg: Haug.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonas W, Jacobs J. (1996) Healing With Homeopathy. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Institute for Homeopathy (2002) Homeopathic Provings: Principles, Conduct, Documentation. 1st edition. Köthen: European Institute for Homeopathy.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linde K., Clausius N., Ramirez G., Melchart D., Eitel F., Hedges L.V. et al. (1997) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet, 20, 350(9081): 834–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gawatz R, Navak P. (1993) Soziale Konstruktionen von Gesundheit. Wissenschaftliche und alltagspraktische Gesundheitskonzepte. Ulm: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hahnemann S. (1991) Die chronischen Krankheiten, ihre eigentümliche Natur und homöopa-thische Heilung, Agaricus musc. bis Calcarea. 5. Nachdruck ed. Heidelberg: Haug.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Committee for Homeopathy (2003) http://www.homeopathyeurope.org/. Ref Type: Electronic Citation
  9. 9.
    Eisenberg D.M., Davis R.B., Ettner S.L., Appel S., Wilkey S., Van Rompay M. et al. (1998) Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA, 280(18): 1569–1575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Härtel U, Volger E. (2004) Inanspruchnahme und Akzeptanz klassischer Naturheilverfahren und alternativer Heilmethoden in Deutschland — Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstudie. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd, 11(6): 327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. (1991) Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ, 302(6772): 316–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shang A., Huwiler-Müntener K., Nartey L., Jüni P., Döring S., Sterne J., Pewsner D., Egger M. (2005) Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet, 366(9487): 726–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Becker-Witt C., Lüdtke R., Weißhuhn T., Willich S.N. (2004) Diagnoses and treatment in Homeopathic medical practice. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 11(2): 98–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Witt C.M., Lüdtke R., Baur R., Willich S.N. (2005) Homeopathic medical Practice: Long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC Public Health, 5: 115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Witt C., Keil T., Selim D., Roll S., Vance W., Wegscheider K., Willich S.N. (2005) Outcome and costs of homoeopathic and conventional treatment strategies: A comparative cohort study in patients with chronic disorders. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 13(2): 79–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Witt
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor, Institute for Social MedicineEpidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations