Advertisement

Technology Adoption: Classroom in the Cocoa Block

  • D. I. Guest
  • R. Daniel
  • Y. Namaliu
  • J. K. KonamEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Plant Pathology in the 21st Century book series (ICPP, volume 4)

Summary

The adoption of technology aimed at improving the sustainability of food, fibre and fuel production is one of the greatest impediments to improving the quality of life, particularly for smallholder farmers in developing countries. Cocoa is Papua New Guinea’s third most important agricultural export crop, after coffee and palm oil, contributing up to 17% of the national agricultural revenue. This chapter describes and discusses a participatory research approach undertaken with smallholder cocoa farmers in Papua New Guinea aimed at providing different levels of farm management tailored to be implemented by farmers according to their particular circumstances.

Keywords

Smallholder Farmer Participatory Action Research Cocoa Production Cocoa Farmer Cocoa Tree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anon (2002) Cocoa production statistics. Cocoa Board of Papua New GuineaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anon (2006) Compendium of food and agriculture indicators. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Statistics Division, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns A (1999) Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Connell J (1997) Papua New Guinea: the struggle for development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornwell S (1999) An interview with Anne Burns and Graham Crookes. Lang Teach 23:7–9Google Scholar
  6. Curry G, Koczberski G, Omuru E, Nailina RS (2007) Farming or foraging? Household labour and livelihood strategies amongst smallholder cocoa growers in Papua New Guinea. Black Swan Press/Curtin University of Technology, Perth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Efron Y, Epaina P, Marfu J (2005) Breeding strategies to improve cocoa production in Papua New Guinea. In: Bekele F, End MJ, Eskes AB (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on cocoa breeding for improved production systems, 2003. Accra, Ghana, pp 79–91Google Scholar
  8. Ghodake RD, Cook KE, Kurika L, Ling G, Moxon JE, Nevenino T (1995) A rapid rural appraisal of the cocoa and coconut farming systems in the northeast lowlands of the Gazelle peninsula of East New Britain province. Department of Agriculture and Lifestock, Konedobu. Technical Report 95/1Google Scholar
  9. Gregory PH, Maddison AC (1981) Epidemiology of Phytophthora on cocoa in Nigeria. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Guest D (2007) Black pod: diverse pathogens with a global impact on cocoa yield. Phytopathology 97:1650–1653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holderness M (1992) Biology and control of Phytophthora diseases of cocoa in Papua New Guinea. In: Keane PJ, Putter CA (eds) Cocoa pest and disease management in Southeast Asia and Australasia. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 112Google Scholar
  12. Keane PJ (1981) Epidemiology of vascular-streak dieback disease of cocoa in Papua New Guinea. Aust J Biol Sci 25:50–55Google Scholar
  13. Konam J, Namaliu Y, Daniel R, Guest D (2008) Integrated pest and disease management for sustainable cocoa production: a training manual for farmers and extension workers. ACIAR Monograph No. 131.Google Scholar
  14. Lummani J, Nailina R (2001) Tri-annual survey results for cocoa and coconut smallholders in East New Britain. PNG Cocoa and Coconut Research Institute, Kerevat and the University of New England, Armidale, NSW. Occasional Paper No 6Google Scholar
  15. McMahon P, Purwantara A (2004) Phytophthora on cocoa. In: Drenth A, Guest DI (eds) Diversity and management of Phytophthora in Southeast Asia. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, pp 104-115. Monograph No. 114Google Scholar
  16. Omuru E (2003) An economic analysis of cocoa and coconut research and development in Papua New Guinea. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  17. Omuru E, Nailina R, Fleming E (2001) A socio-economic baseline survey of cocoa and copra smallholders in East New Britain. PNG Cocoa and Coconut Research Institute, Keravat and the University of New England, Armidale. Occasional Paper 1Google Scholar
  18. Prior C (1984) Approaches to the control of diseases of cocoa in Papua New Guinea. J Plant Prot Trop 1:39–46Google Scholar
  19. Saul JY (1989) A study of the resistance of Kerevat cocoa clones to pod rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora. MSc Qualifying thesis, LaTrobe University, LaTrobe, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Simatab J (2007) Towards a sustainable cocoa economy in PNG: enhancing cocoa production through adoption of Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPDM) with farmers participation. Round Table Conference on A Sustainable World Cocoa Economy, Accra, Ghana, 3-6 October 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. I. Guest
    • 1
  • R. Daniel
    • 1
  • Y. Namaliu
    • 2
  • J. K. Konam
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural ResourcesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.PNG Cocoa and Coconut InstituteStewart Research StationMadangPapua New Guinea
  3. 3.Plant Health Team, Land Resources DivisionSouth Pacific CommissionSUVAFiji Islands

Personalised recommendations