Abstract
Companies wishing to realise broader societal and environmental objectives often choose Triple-Bottom-Line (TBL) accounting as a reporting approach. TBL accounting covers social, economic and environmental indicators and thus enables decision-makers to quantify trade-offs between different facets of sustainability. Two issues are critical when considering TBL accounting. Firstly, indicators must include both the direct (on-site, immediate) effects of the company as well as the indirect (off-site, upstream, embodied) effects associated with purchasing from a potentially large and distant web of suppliers. The incorporation of all indirect or upstream impacts removes problems related to the choice of boundaries. Secondly, it is important to address the question of how to assign responsibility for the indirect impacts as these are shared between partners in a supply chain and must not be double-counted.
The research question of this work is therefore how can corporate sustainability performance be quantified and compared in practice whilst taking into account the responsibility-sharing nature of trading and avoiding double-counting of impacts? We (a) describe the analytical approach to measure the indirect impacts of a comprehensive TBL account of a producing entity; (b) present a quantitative concept of shared responsibility as a solution to assigning responsibility to both producers and consumers in a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive way; and (c) demonstrate practical applications in examples of quantification of indirect impacts, supply chain contributions, and shared responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bastianoni, S., Ponselle, F. M., & Tizzy, E. (2004). The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 49(3), 253.
Carbon Trust (2006). Carbon footprints in the supply chain: the next step for business (Report No. CTC616). Retrieved November, 2006, from http://www.carbontrust.co.uk
Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Eco-Management and Auditing, 9, 46–66.
CIPS (1999). Ethical business practices in purchasing and supply. Retrieved from http://www.epolitix.com/data/companies/images/Companies/Chartered-Institute-of-Purchasing-and-Supply/ethics.pdf
CIPS (2000). Environmental purchasing and supply management summary. Retrieved from http://www.epolitix.com/data/companies/images/Companies/Chartered-Institute-of-Purchasing-and-Supply/environmental.pdf
CIPS (2002). Environmental purchasing in practice—Guidance for organisations. Institute for Environmental Management and Assessment, Chartered Institute for Purchasing and Supply, NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency.
Crama, Y., Defourny, J., & Gazon, J. (1984). Structural decomposition of multipliers in inputoutput or social accounting matrix analysis Economie Appliquée, 37, 215–222.
Daub, C. H. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 75.
de Haan, M., & Keuning, S. J. (1996). Taking the environment into account: The NAMEA approach. Review of Income and Wealth, 42(2), 131–147.
de Haan, M. (1999). On the international harmonisation of environmental accounting: comparing the National Accounting Matrix including Environmental Accounts of Sweden, Germany, the UK, Japan and the Netherlands. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10(1), 151.
Defourny J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework. Economic Journal, 94, 111–136.
DEFRA (2006, May). Environmental key performance indicators—Reporting guidelines for UK business. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
EPA NSW (2003, October). Extended producer responsibility priority statement. Sydney South: Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales.
Eurostat (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators (2000 ed.). A methodological guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Statistical Office of the European Communities.
Foran, B., Lenzen, M., Dey, C., & Bilek, M. (2005a). Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting. Ecological Economics, 52(2), 143–157.
Foran, B., Lenzen, M., & Dey, C. (2005b). Balancing Act: A triple bottom line analysis of the 135 sectors of the Australian economy (CSIRO Technical Report, CSIRO Resource Futures and the University of Sydney). Retrieved from http://www.cse.csiro.au/research/balancingact, http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au
Gallego, B., & Lenzen, M. (2005). A consistent input-output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. Economic Systems Research, 17(4), 365–391.
Global Reporting Initiative (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Boston: Global Reporting Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative (2005). GRI Boundary Protocol Global Reporting Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.globalreporting.org/guidelines/protocols/BoundaryProtocol.pdf
Herendeen, R. A. (1973). Use of input-output analysis to determine the energy cost of goods and services. In M. S. Macrakis (Ed.), Energy: demand, conservation, and institutional problems (pp. 141–158). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Herendeen, R. A. (1974). Affluence and energy demand. Mechanical Engineering, 96(10), 18–22.
Herendeen, R. A. (1978). Input-output techniques and energy cost of commodities. Energy Policy, 6(2), 162–165.
Herendeen, R. A. (1981). Energy intensities in ecological and economic systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 91, 607–620.
Herendeen R., & Sebald, A. (1975). Energy, employment and dollar impacts of certain consumer options. In R. H. Williams (Ed.), The energy conservation papers (pp. 131–170). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
Herendeen, R., & Tanaka, J. (1976). Energy cost of living. Energy, 1, 165–178.
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64.
Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2005). How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 55(4), 551–563.
Lenzen, M. (2001). A generalised input-output multiplier calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 13(1), 65–92.
Lenzen, M. (2002). A guide for compiling inventories in hybrid life-cycle assessments: some Australian results. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(6), 545–572.
Lenzen, M. (2003). Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(1), 1.
Lenzen, M. (2007). Sustainable island businesses: a case study of Norfolk Island ISA (Research Report 07/03), Centre for Integrated Sustainability Analysis (ISA) at the University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/partners/Norfolk.shtml
Lenzen, M., & Murray, S. A. (2003). The ecological footprint—Issues and trends (ISA Research Paper 01–03, The University of Sydney). Retrieved from http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/publications/documents/Ecological_Footprint_Issues_and_Trends.pdf
Lenzen, M., Pade, L. L., Munksgaard, J. (2004). CO2 Multipliers in multi-region input-output models. Economic Systems Research, 16(4), 391–412.
Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007). Shared producer and consumer responsibility—theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 27–42.
Lenzen, M. (in press) Aggregation (in-)variance of shared responsibility: A case study of Australia. Ecological Economics.
Lenzen, M. (submitted) Double-counting in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology.
Leontief, W., & Ford, D., (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 262–271.
McKerlie, K., Knight, N., & Thorpe, B. (2006). Advancing extended producer responsibility in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 616–628.
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (1985). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Munksgaard, J., & Pedersen, K. A. (2001). CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Policy, 29(4), 327.
Munksgaard, J., Minx, J. C., Christofferson, L. B., Pade, L. L., & Suh, S. (2008) Models for national CO2 accounting. In Handbook on input-output economics for industrial ecology. Dordrecht: Springer.
National Academy of Sciences (2004). Materials count: the case for material flows analysis committee on material flows accounting of natural resources, products, and residuals, Committee on Earth Resources, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10705.html
OECD (2001). Extended producer responsibility: A guidance manual for governments. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
ONS (2006). United Kingdom input-output analyses (2006 ed.). London: Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_economy/Input_Output_Analyses_2006_edition.pdf
ONS (2007, July). Environmental accounts: greenhouse gas emissions for 93 industries. Office for National Statistics, London. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset. asp?vlnk = 5695&More&=&Y
Peters, G. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2006). Pollution embodied in trade: The Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change, 16(4), 379–387.
Princen, T. (1999). Consumption and environment: Some conceptual issues. Ecological Economics, 31, 347–363.
Proops, J. L. R. (1977, March). Input-output analysis and energy intensities: a comparison of methodologies. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1, 181–186.
Rodrigues, J., Domingos, T., Giljum, S., & Schneider, F. (2006). Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility. Ecological Economics, 59(3), 256.
Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., & Petersen, H. (2003). An introduction to corporate environmental management: Striving for sustainability. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M.,& Burritt, R. (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting. Ecoefficiency in industry and science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Managing the business case for sustainability—The integration of social, environmental and economic performance. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
SEI, WWF, & CURE (2006). Counting consumption-CO2 emissions, material flows and Ecological Footprint of the UK by region and devolved country Godalming, WWF-UK.
Seuring, S. (2004). Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: Differences and interrelations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(5), 306–319.
Spangenberg, J. H., & Lorek, S. (2002). Environmentally sustainable household consumption: from aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecological Economics, 43, 127–140.
Stahmer, C. (2000). The magic triangle of input-output tables Macerata.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2001). Endbericht zum Projekt ‘A Physical Input-Output-Table for Germany, 1995’ 98/559/3040/B4/MM Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden. Retrieved from http://www.destatis.de/download/veroe/piotprojektbericht.pdf, http://www.destatis.de/allg/d/veroe/inouttab.htm
Steven, M. (2004). Standardisation of environmental reporting. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 76–93.
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., et al. (2004). System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(3), 657–664.
Taplin, J. R. D., Bent, D., & Aeron-Thomas, D. (2006). Developing a sustainability accounting framework to inform strategic business decisions: a case study from the chemicals industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 347–360.
Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (1996). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories—Reporting Instructions (Vol. 1) Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Tokyo. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs1.htm
von Ahsen, A., Lange, G., & Pianowski, M. (2004). Corporate environmental reporting: survey and empirical evidence. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 5–17.
Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D., et al. (2005, May). National footprint and biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method. Oakland, CA: Global Footprint Network. Retrieved from http://www.footprintnetwork.org
WBCSD and WRI (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol—A corporate accounting and reporting standard. World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute. Retrieved March, 2004, from http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/ghg-protocolrevised.pdf
WCED (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Welford, R. (1996). Corporate environmental management: Systems and strategies. London: Earthscan.
Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barrett, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2006). Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis. Ecological Economics, 56(1), 28–48.
Wiedmann, T., & Lenzen, M. (2006a). Sharing responsibility along supply chains—A new lifecycle approach and software tool for triple-bottom-line accounting. Paper presented at The Corporate Responsibility Research conference 2006, Dublin: Trinity College. Retrieved, September 4–5, 2006, from http://www.isa-research.co.uk/docs/Wiedmann_Lenzen_2006_CRRC_paper.pdf, http://www.crrconference.org/downloads/2006wiedmannlensen.pdf
Wiedmann, T., & Lenzen, M. (2006b, 15–16 November). Triple-bottom-line accounting of social, economic and environmental indicators—A new life-cycle software tool for UK businesses. Paper presented at the third annual international sustainable development conference on “Sustainability—Creating the Culture”, Perth. Retrieved from http://www.isa-research.co.uk/docs/Wiedmann_Lenzen_2006_SDRC_paper.pdf
Wiedmann, T., Barrett, J., & Lenzen, M. (2007). Companies on the scale—comparing and benchmarking the footprints of businesses. Paper presented at the International Ecological Footprint conference, Cardiff. Retrieved May 8–10, 2007 from http://www.brass.cf.ac.uk/uploads/Wiedmann_et_al_P36.pdf, http://www.isa-research.co.uk/docs/Wiedmann_et_al._2007_Cardiff_Companies_EF.pdf
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. (2007a). Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities—Part 2: review of input-output models forthe assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 15–26.
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008) A definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’. In C. C. Pertsova Ecological economics research trends. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers. 2.1 55–65 (also available as ISA-UK Research Report 07/01 http://www.isa-research.co.uk/reports.html)
WWF, Zoological Society of London, & Global Footprint Network (2006). Living Planet Report 2006 Gland, World-Wide Fund for Nature International (WWF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M. (2008). Unravelling the Impacts of Supply Chains—A New Triple-Bottom-Line Accounting Approach and Software Tool. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R.L., Jasch, C. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8912-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8913-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)