Skip to main content

Success Factors in Developing EMA—Experiences from Four Follow-Up Case Studies in Finland

  • Chapter
Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 24))

Abstract

Pressure to include environmental issues in corporate decision-making is increasing. Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) is a tool-kit for monitoring environmental loads and costs caused by a company’s processes and thus it is essential for effective environmental management. This paper aims to identify the success and failure factors in EMA development, on the basis of four longitudinal case studies conducted in large Finnish companies in the period 1996–2005. In the mid-1990s, pilot EMA systems were designed and implemented in these companies, and in 2005, the current state of their EMA practices was recorded by interviewing corporate representatives and studying corporate reports. This followup study showed that only one of the companies had voluntarily and successfully continued developing its pilot EMA system, whereas the others had abandoned their systems as not being value-adding. The motives behind this outcome are important to clarify in order to ensure that further EMA research and development focuses on essential questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bartolomeo, M. B., & Jan Jaa, M. (2000). Environmental management accounting in Europe: Current practice and future potential. The European Accounting Review, 9(1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., Rikhardsson, P., & Schaltegger, S. (2003). Adopting environmental management accounting: EMA as a value-adding activity. In P. Rikhardsson, M. Bennett, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Environmental management accounting-Purpose and progress (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L. (2004). Environmental management accounting: Roadblocks on the way to the green and pleasant land. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting. Links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(2), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elisa (2006). Annual report. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.elisa.com/english/

  • Fujitsu Services (2006). Annual report. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.fujitsu.com/fi/

  • FEA (2003). Guide to corporate environmental cost management. Berlin: German Federal Ministry for Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. O. & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 292–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAC (2005). International guidance document on environmental management accounting. Retrieved July 21, 2006, from http://www.ifac.org

  • Kesko (2006). Annual report. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.kesko.fi/

  • Kumpulainen, A. (2005). Environmental business accounting in four Finnish case companies—Followup study between 1996 and 2005. Masters thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohjola, T. (1999). Environmental modelling system—A framework for cost-effective environmental decision-making processes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., & Burritt, R. (Eds.). (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDSD (2001). Environmental management accounting: Procedures and principles. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/proceduresandprinciples.pdf

  • UNDSD (2002). Environmental management accounting: Policies and linkages. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/policiesandlinkages.pdf

  • VR (2006). Annual report. Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.vrgroup.fi

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Kumpulainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kumpulainen, A., Pohjola, T. (2008). Success Factors in Developing EMA—Experiences from Four Follow-Up Case Studies in Finland. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R.L., Jasch, C. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics