Abstract
This paper presents findings of an intrinsic case study about how Hydro Aluminium Sunndal, Norway (HAS) implemented a environmental management accounting tool (Total Environmental Accounting and Managements System, TEAMS) in 2003. The case study focussed on how TEAMS could be implemented as an effective information and reporting tool at HAS.
HAS is located in Møre and Romsdal, western Norway, and is operated by Norway’s largest industrial group, Norsk Hydro ASA (Hydro). Hydro is the third-largest integrated aluminium supplier in the world, with a presence on every continent. Hydro’s history and commitment to the United Nations Global Compact principles is the context and perspective of the study of environmental performance on a local scale.
At site-level, a need for more detailed and relevant information on certain emissions, working environment, noise pollution and waste management was identified. The assessment of TEAMS, as a reporting tool, showed that the system is capable of meeting these specific site reporting needs. However, achieving accurate reporting requires that the implementation process is well planned and that sufficient resources are available during the initial phase.
The network of spreadsheets previously in use for environmental management activities, such as accounting and reporting, creates an unnecessarily complex, brittle and vulnerable system. TEAMS will arguably represent a much more resilient and effective information system compared to the present system at HAS. Another important benefit connected to new reporting trends, such as sustainability reporting, is that TEAMS facilitates effective communication with stakeholders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Burritt, R. L. (2005). Challenges for environmental management accounting. In P. Rikhardsson, M. Bennett, J. Bouma, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Implementing environmental management accounting: Status and challenges (pp. 19–44). Dordrecht: Springer.
DJSI (2006). Dow Jones sustainability indexes. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.hydro.com/en/press_room/news/archive/2006_09/dow jones_index_en.html
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Emisoft (2006). TEAMS—Environmental reporting and management system. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.emisoft.com
Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., Screbotnjak, T., & de Shirbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national stewardship. New Haven, CT: Colombia University Press.
Esty, D. C., Srebotnjak, T., Kim, C. H., Levy, M. A., de Sherbinin, A., & Andersen, B. (2006). Pilot 2006 environmental performance index. New Haven, CT: Colombia University Press.
Fussler, C., Cramer, A., & van der Vegt, S. (2004). Raising the bar: Creating value with the United Nations Global Compact. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
GRI (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Retrieved July 30, 2005, from http://www.globalreporting.org/guidelines/2002/GRI_guidelines_print.pdf
Holliday, Jr C. H., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, P. (2002). Walking the talk. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Hydro (2006). Annual report Norsk Hydro. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.hydro.com
Lang, C., Heubach, D., & Loew, T. (2005). Using software systems to support environmental accounting instruments. In P. Rikhardsson, M. Bennett, J. Bouma, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Implementing environmental management accounting: Status and challenges (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystem and human well-being: Opportunities and challenges for business and industry. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Nertun, A. K., & Pollestad, G. (2004). Strategisk og operativ bruk av miljøregnskaps—og informasjonsystemet TEAMS til miljørapportering, Case: Hydro aluminium Sunndal (Strategic and operational use of the environmental accounting and information system TEAMS for environmental reporting, Case: Hydro Aluminium Sunndal. M.Sc. Thesis, Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (available only in Norwegian).
Olsen, O. (1994). Miljøovervåking. Trondheim: Tapir Forlag (available only in Norwegian).
Ongstad, L., Aasland, T., & Stoll, C. I. (1994). The Norwegian aluminium industry and the local environment project to study the effects of industrial emissions from primary aluminium plants in Norway—Summary report. Oslo: Hydro Media.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting—Issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Schnell, J. K. (2004). Full production at New Sunndal Norsk Hydro. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.hydro.com/en/press_room/news/archive/2004_08/full_prod_sunndal_en.html
Stokke, O. S., & Thommessen, Ø. B. (2003). Yearbook of the international co-operation on environment and development 2003/2004 London, an independent publication from the Fridtjof Nansen Institute. Norway: Earthscan.
UNEP (2003). Global environmental outlock—GEO3. London: Earthscan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hermansen, J.E., Mølmen-Nertun, A.K., Pollestad, G. (2008). Operational Use of the Environmental Accounting and Information Software TEAMS at Hydro Aluminium Sunndal, Norway. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R.L., Jasch, C. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8912-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8913-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)